| Literature DB >> 36057567 |
Carmen Álvarez-Nieto1, Cristina Álvarez-García2, Laura Parra-Anguita1, Sebastián Sanz-Martos1, Isabel M López-Medina1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mainstreaming sustainable healthcare into the curricula of health professions is a key action to raise awareness and change attitudes. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the contribution of scenario-based learning and augmented reality to the environmental awareness and attitudes toward climate change and sustainability among undergraduate nursing students.Entities:
Keywords: Attitudes; Awareness; Climate change; Nursing students; Scenario-based learning; Sustainability
Year: 2022 PMID: 36057567 PMCID: PMC9439938 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01023-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nurs ISSN: 1472-6955
Sustainability attitudes (items 1-5) and awareness (items 6-8) in nursing survey
1. Climate change is an important issue for nursing. 2. Issues about climate change should be included in the nursing curriculum. 3. Sustainability is an important issue for nursing. 4. Sustainability should be included in the nursing curriculum. 5. I apply sustainability principles at home. 6. All university students should learn about the impact of climate change when studying their subject. 7. Concerns about the environment influenced my choice of university. 8. The University of _________‘s sustainability reputation influenced my choice of university. |
Awareness in nursing practice items
9. I apply sustainability principles in my nursing practice. 10. I am aware of unsustainable practice in my work environment. 11. I challenge unsustainable practice in my work environment. 12. I feel unable to challenge unsustainable practice in my work environment. |
Questions for feedback on the sustainability scenario-based sessions
1. The scenario was realistic. 2. The resources were useful. 3. The session was interesting. 4. The session was engaging. 5. The session helped me to make links between climate change and health. 6. I enjoyed the session. 7. The session helped me to make links between resources and heath. 8. I would prefer this session as a lecture. |
Fig. 1Summary of the sessions and data collection in each academic year
Demographic data of the sample (N = 96)
| Demographic data | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (M/SD) | 21.13 (4.82) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 23 (24) |
| Female | 73 (76) |
| Pathway to University | |
| Baccalaureate | 52 (55.2) |
| Professional training | 37 (38.5) |
| Other university degree | 2 (2.1) |
| Over 25 years old | 3 (3.2) |
| Over 45 years old | 1 (1) |
| Attended a sustainability session | |
| Yes, within the prior three months | 29 (30.2) |
| No | 54 (56.3) |
| Yes, more than 3 months prior | 13 (13.5) |
Comparisons of statements among Years 1, 2, and 3
| Statement | Year 1 ( | Year 2 ( | Year 3 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Climate change is an important issue for nursing. | 6.05 | 6.702a | 6.754b |
| 2. Issues about climate change should be included in the nursing curriculum. | 5.1 | 6.176a | 6.246b |
| 3. Sustainability is an important issue for nursing. | 5.792 | 6.458a | 6.574b |
| 4. Sustainability should be included in the nursing curriculum. | 5.033 | 6.053a | 6.189b |
| 5. I apply sustainability principles at home. | 5.3 | 5.344 | 5.361 |
| Mean | 5.4729 | 6.1583a | 6.2250b |
| Total | 27.365 | 30.792a | 31.125b |
aSignificant differences between Year 1 and 2
bSignificant differences between Year 2 and 3
Number (and percentages) of participants according to the level of attitudes
| Academic Year | Excellent | Very good | Good | Not enough | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 20 (20.8) | 56 (58.3) | 15 (15.6) | 5 (5.3) | 0 |
| Year 2 | 55 (57.3) | 36 (37.5) | 2 (2.1) | 1 (1) | 2 (2.1) |
| Year 3 | 54 (56.3) | 38 (39.6) | 3 (3.1) | 0 | 1 (1) |
Session feedback mean scores
| Statement | Year 2 ( | Year 3 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | |
| 1. The scenario was realistic. | 6.344 | 6.25 | 6.3 |
| 2. The resources were useful. | 6.420 | 6.42 | 6.43 |
| 3. The session was interesting. | 6.366 | 6.43 | 6.38 |
| 4. The session was engaging. | 6.176 | 6.39 | 6.21 |
| 5. The session helped me to make links between climate change and health. | 6.305 | 6.48 | 6.37 |
| 6. I enjoyed the session. | 6.191 | 6.46 | 6.19a |
| 7. The session helped me to make links between resources and heath. | 6.282 | 6.48 | 6.31 |
| 8. I would prefer this session as a lecture. | 4.435 | 4.04 | 4.83a |
aSignificant differences between Session 2 and Session 3
Percentage of scores above 5 on session feedback
| Statement | Year 2 ( | Year 3 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | |
| 1. The scenario was realistic. | 94.7 | 93.4 | 93.9 |
| 2. The resources were useful. | 96.2 | 94.2 | 95.7 |
| 3. The session was interesting. | 93.1 | 94.3 | 93 |
| 4. The session was engaging. | 90.8 | 93.4 | 90.4 |
| 5. The session helped me make links between climate change and health. | 95.4 | 97.5 | 94.8 |
| 6. I enjoyed the session. | 90.8 | 96.7 | 92.1 |
| 7. The session helped me make links between resources and heath. | 93.1 | 98.4 | 91.3 |
| 8. I would prefer this session as a lecture. | 51.9 | 40.2 | 55.7 |