Literature DB >> 36057069

A machine learning approach to predicting early and late postoperative reintubation.

Mathew J Koretsky1, Ethan Y Brovman2, Richard D Urman3, Mitchell H Tsai4, Nick Cheney5.   

Abstract

Accurate estimation of surgical risks is important for informing the process of shared decision making and informed consent. Postoperative reintubation (POR) is a severe complication that is associated with postoperative morbidity. Previous studies have divided POR into early POR (within 72 h of surgery) and late POR (within 30 days of surgery). Using data provided by American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), machine learning classification models (logistic regression, random forest classification, and gradient boosting classification) were utilized to develop scoring systems for the prediction of combined, early, and late POR. The risk factors included in each scoring system were narrowed down from a set of 37 pre and perioperative factors. The scoring systems developed from the logistic regression models demonstrated strong performance in terms of both accuracy and discrimination across the different POR outcomes (Average Brier score, 0.172; Average c-statistic, 0.852). These results were only marginally worse than prediction using the full set of risk variables (Average Brier score, 0.145; Average c-statistic, 0.870). While more work needs to be done to identify clinically relevant differences between the early and late POR outcomes, the scoring systems provided here can be used by surgeons and patients to improve the quality of care overall.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Postoperative; Prediction; Reintubation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36057069     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00908-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  10 in total

1.  Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure.

Authors:  André Altmann; Laura Toloşi; Oliver Sander; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Karen E Richards; Bruce L Hall; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2010

3.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Development and validation of a score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications.

Authors:  Britta Brueckmann; Jose L Villa-Uribe; Brian T Bateman; Martina Grosse-Sundrup; Dean R Hess; Christopher L Schlett; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Points of significance: Nonparametric tests.

Authors:  Martin Krzywinski; Naomi Altman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko; Karl Y Bilimoria; Lynn Zhou; Kristopher Huffman; Xue Wang; Yaoming Liu; Kari Kraemer; Xiangju Meng; Ryan Merkow; Warren Chow; Brian Matel; Karen Richards; Amy J Hart; Justin B Dimick; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.

Authors:  Anthony K Akobeng
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Unplanned Reintubation Following Cardiac Surgery: Incidence, Timing, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Anair Beverly; Ethan Y Brovman; Raymond J Malapero; Robert W Lekowski; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  A scoring system to predict unplanned intubation in patients having undergone major surgical procedures.

Authors:  May Hua; Joanne E Brady; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.108

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.