Literature DB >> 23628227

Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.

Mark E Cohen1, Clifford Y Ko, Karl Y Bilimoria, Lynn Zhou, Kristopher Huffman, Xue Wang, Yaoming Liu, Kari Kraemer, Xiangju Meng, Ryan Merkow, Warren Chow, Brian Matel, Karen Richards, Amy J Hart, Justin B Dimick, Bruce L Hall.   

Abstract

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) collects detailed clinical data from participating hospitals using standardized data definitions, analyzes these data, and provides participating hospitals with reports that permit risk-adjusted comparisons with a surgical quality standard. Since its inception, the ACS NSQIP has worked to refine surgical outcomes measurements and enhance statistical methods to improve the reliability and validity of this hospital profiling. From an original focus on controlling for between-hospital differences in patient risk factors with logistic regression, ACS NSQIP has added a variable to better adjust for the complexity and risk profile of surgical procedures (procedure mix adjustment) and stabilized estimates derived from small samples by using a hierarchical model with shrinkage adjustment. New models have been developed focusing on specific surgical procedures (eg, "Procedure Targeted" models), which provide opportunities to incorporate indication and other procedure-specific variables and outcomes to improve risk adjustment. In addition, comparative benchmark reports given to participating hospitals have been expanded considerably to allow more detailed evaluations of performance. Finally, procedures have been developed to estimate surgical risk for individual patients. This article describes the development of, and justification for, these new statistical methods and reporting strategies in ACS NSQIP.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS; American College of Surgeons; CPT; Current Procedural Terminology; O/E; OR; SAR; VA; VASQIP; Veterans Affairs; Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program; observed to expected ratio; odds ratio; semi-annual report

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23628227     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  121 in total

1.  Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Laura Doyon; Alejandro Moreno-Koehler; Rocco Ricciardi; Dmitry Nepomnayshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable?

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Jonathan F Finks; Wayne J English; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Does laparoscopy reduce splenic injuries during colorectal resections? An assessment from the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Ozgen Isik; Erman Aytac; Jean Ashburn; Gokhan Ozuner; Feza Remzi; Meagan Costedio; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Can routine preoperative data predict adverse outcomes in the elderly? Development and validation of a simple risk model incorporating a chart-derived frailty score.

Authors:  Levana G Amrock; Mark D Neuman; Hung-Mo Lin; Stacie Deiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Karen J Brasel; Sara K Johnson; Amy Zelenski; Paul J Rathouz; Qianqian Zhao; Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Toby C Campbell; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Impact of Interhospital Transfer on Outcomes in Non-emergency Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Stephen P Sharp; Daniel J Schuster; Ashar Ata; Brian T Valerian; Jonathan J Canete; A David Chismark; Edward C Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Hospital variation in rates of concurrent fundoplication during gastrostomy enteral access procedures.

Authors:  Anne M Stey; Charles D Vinocur; R Lawrence Moss; Bruce L Hall; Mark E Cohen; Kari Kraemer; Clifford Y Ko; Brian D Kenney; Loren Berman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predicting 30-day postoperative mortality for emergent anterior abdominal wall hernia repairs using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  P J Chung; J S Lee; S Tam; A Schwartzman; M O Bernstein; L Dresner; A Alfonso; G Sugiyama
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Pre-Operative, Intra-Operative, and Post-Operative Factors Associated with Post-Discharge Venous Thromboembolism Following Colorectal Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Jessica Y Liu; Anthony D Yang; David J Bentrem; Karl Y Bilimoria; Ryan P Merkow
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Trends and risk factors for transfusion in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Donald J Lucas; Katherine I Schexneider; Matthew Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Steven M Frank; Kenzo Hirose; Nita Ahuja; Martin Makary; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.