| Literature DB >> 36051212 |
Pei Wang1, Sindy Chapa1.
Abstract
This work aims to promote the development of the online shopping market and improve the online marketing effect of goods. First, entrepreneurial psychology and online shopping are discussed. Then, impulse buying behavior (IBB) is analyzed, and the IBB model and hypotheses of consumers are proposed under the psychological model. Finally, consumers' IBB during COVID-19 is assessed under the psychological models. Hedonic shopping value (HSV) is a psychological factor directly affecting consumers' IBB during COVID-19. The results indicate that COVID-19 has a specific stimulating effect on IBB. Meanwhile, the types of goods consumers buy during COVID-19 vary widely across age groups and regions. Overall, clothing is the most purchased item by consumers. This work provides the main reference for the improvement of the online commodity marketing effect and makes a crucial contribution to the development of the online shopping market.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; entrepreneurial psychology; impulse buying behavior; marketing effect; online shopping
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051212 PMCID: PMC9424845 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Basic situation of entrepreneurial psychology. (A) The basic connotation of entrepreneurial psychology; (B) The influencing factors and evaluation indicators of entrepreneurial psychology.
FIGURE 2Basic forms of online shopping. (A) Online shopping malls; (B) Shopping channels via social software; (C) Shopping function of social software.
FIGURE 3Specific design ideas of marketing plans by exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior (IBB).
FIGURE 4Psychological models of impulse buying behavior (IBB).
Test criteria and the coefficients.
| Item | Item load | Cronbach’s α coefficient |
|
| ||
| Navigating these web pages where I purchased the item mentioned above was easy. | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| My interaction with the website where I purchased the item was clear and understandable. | 0.88 | |
| It is easy to become skillful at navigating the pages of the website where I purchased the item. | 0.86 | |
| Overall, the pages where I purchased the item were easy to navigate. | 0.89 | |
| It was pleasant to follow the overall flow of the website where I purchased the item. | 0.86 | |
| It was pleasant to follow and use the menu structure of the site where I purchased the item. | 0.85 | |
|
| ||
| The shopping site where I purchased the item was visually pleasing. | 0.82 | 0.95 |
| The shopping site where I purchased the item displayed a visually pleasing design. | 0.87 | |
| The shopping site where I purchased the item was visually appealing. | 0.92 | |
| The images and typographies used in the shopping sites where I purchased the item were stylish. | 0.92 | |
| The overall atmosphere and screen display of the shopping sites where I purchased the item were well coordinated. | 0.91 | |
| It was pleasant to see the provided information on each screen of the shopping site where I purchased the item. | 0.86 | |
|
| ||
| This online shopping experience was truly a joy during this hard time. | ||
| Compared to other things I could have done, the time spent online shopping was truly enjoyable. | 0.72 | 0.88 |
| I enjoyed online shopping for its own sake, not just for the items I may have purchased. | 0.84 | |
| During my online shopping, I felt the excitement of the hunt. | 0.87 | |
| While I was online shopping, I felt a sense of adventure. | 0.88 | |
|
| 0.75 | 0.92 |
| My interaction with the product(s) purchased online during the COVID-19 pandemic was enjoyable. | 0.93 | |
| My interaction with the product(s) purchased online during the COVID-19 pandemic is exciting. | 0.92 | |
| My interaction with the product(s) purchased online during the COVID-19 pandemic is pleasant. | 0.93 | |
|
| ||
| Using these product(s) I purchased online, I can improve my performance in life during the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| Using these product(s) I purchased online, I can increase my productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.84 | |
| Using these product(s) I purchased online, I can enhance my effectiveness in daily life during the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.91 | |
| I would find the product(s) I purchased online useful in my life during the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.76 | |
|
| ||
| I bought the product(s) listed above because of the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| I bought the product(s) listed above primarily because of the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.94 | |
| I would not have bought the product(s) listed above if it was not for the COVID-19 pandemic. | 0.87 | |
|
| ||
| During the COVID-19 pandemic, I had the urge to purchase items other than or in addition to my specific shopping goal. | 0.91 | 0.90 |
| During the COVID-19 pandemic, I had a desire to buy items that did not pertain to my specific shopping goal. | 0.93 | |
| During the COVID-19 pandemic, I had the inclination to purchase items outside my specific shopping goal. | 0.91 |
N = 232.
Correlation and average variance of pandemic cues (PC).
| Mean-variance | PE | PC | EV | WA | HSV | PU | OIB | |
| PE | 0.797 |
| ||||||
| PC | 0.709 | 0.148 |
| |||||
| EV | 0.691 | 0.625 | 0.148 |
| ||||
| WA | 0.751 | 0.711 | 0.268 | 0.837 |
| |||
| HSV | 0.611 | 0.716 | 0.310 | 0.434 | 0.543 |
| ||
| PU | 0.631 | 0.710 | 0.435 | 0.638 | 0.679 | 0.611 |
| |
| OIB | 0.758 | 0.506 | 0.292 | 0.155 | 0.365 | 0.712 | 0.367 |
|
The bold value represents the peak value for this test.
FIGURE 5Hypothesis verification results of the psychological model.
Age effects.
| Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
| Sig. | |
| Between-group | 60.03 | 5 | 12.01 | 7.66 | 0.000 |
| Within-group | 354.25 | 226 | 1.567 | ||
| Total | 414.27 | 231 |
Product category’s effects.
| Personal use only (1) | Electronic product (2) | Family use products (3) | Personal and family use products (4) | Three categories (5) | |
|
| 2.93 | 2.63 | 4 | 2.85 | 2.84 |
|
| 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 1.21 |
F(5,226) = 7.66, P < 0.001; a and b represent the two types in H6. The data with no subscript were in common differences, P < 0.05; Bonferroni for post-hoc comparisons: b.
Effects of geographic location.
| Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
| Sig. | |
| Between-group | 2.84 | 5 | 0.57 | 2.72 | 0.021 |
| Within-group | 47.43 | 226 | 0.21 | ||
| Total | 50.27 | 231 |
Effects of product categories.
| Personal use only (1) | Electronic product (2) | Family use products (3) | Personal and family use products (4) | Three categories (5) | |
|
| 2.01 | 2.00 | 2.08 | 2.15 | 2.29 |
|
| 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.69 |
F(5,226) = 2.72, P < 0.05; a and b represents two types in H6. The data with no subscript were in common differences, P < 0.05; Bonferroni for post-hoc comparisons: b.