Literature DB >> 33253414

Patterns of Load-to-Strength Ratios Along the Spine in a Population-Based Cohort to Evaluate the Contribution of Spinal Loading to Vertebral Fractures.

Hossein Mokhtarzadeh1, Dennis E Anderson2,3, Brett T Allaire2, Mary L Bouxsein2,3,4.   

Abstract

Vertebral fractures (VFx) are common among older adults. Epidemiological studies report high occurrence of VFx at mid-thoracic and thoracolumbar regions of the spine; however, reasons for this observation remain poorly understood. Prior reports of high ratios of spinal loading to vertebral strength in the thoracolumbar region suggest a possible biomechanical explanation. However, no studies have evaluated load-to-strength ratios (LSRs) throughout the spine for a large number of activities in a sizeable cohort. Thus, we performed a cross-sectional study in a sample of adult men and women from a population-based cohort to: 1) determine which activities cause the largest vertebral LSRs, and 2) examine patterns of LSRs along the spine for these high-load activities. We used subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the trunk to determine vertebral compressive loads for 109 activities in 250 individuals (aged 41 to 90 years, 50% women) from the Framingham Heart Study. Vertebral compressive strengths from T4 to L4 were calculated from computed tomography-based vertebral size and bone density measurements. We determined which activities caused maximum LSRs at each of these spinal levels. We identified nine activities that accounted for >95% of the maximum LSRs overall and at least 89.6% at each spinal level. The activity with the highest LSR varied by spinal level, and three distinct spinal regions could be identified by the activity producing maximum LSRs: lateral bending with a weight in one hand (upper thoracic), holding weights with elbows flexed (lower thoracic), and forward flexion with weight (lumbar). This study highlights the need to consider a range of lifting, holding, and non-symmetric activities when evaluating vertebral LSRs. Moreover, we identified key activities that produce higher loading in multiple regions of the spine. These results provide the first guidance on what activities to consider when evaluating vertebral load-to-strength ratios in future studies, including those examining dynamic motions and the biomechanics of VFx.
© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIOMECHANICS; BONE QCT; FRACTURE PREVENTION; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33253414      PMCID: PMC8383210          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  31 in total

1.  Classification of spinal injuries based on the essential traumatic spinal mechanisms.

Authors:  S M Iencean
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement.

Authors:  Scott L Delp; Frank C Anderson; Allison S Arnold; Peter Loan; Ayman Habib; Chand T John; Eran Guendelman; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  The torsional injury of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H F Farfan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spinal Loading Patterns From Biomechanical Modeling Explain the High Incidence of Vertebral Fractures in the Thoracolumbar Region.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Katelyn Burkhart; Brett Allaire; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans.

Authors:  David L Kopperdahl; Thor Aspelund; Paul F Hoffmann; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Population-based study of age- and sex-related differences in muscle density and size in thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham study.

Authors:  F Johannesdottir; B Allaire; D E Anderson; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture.

Authors:  D E Anderson; S Demissie; B T Allaire; A G Bruno; D L Kopperdahl; T M Keaveny; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures-Health economic implications.

Authors:  Julian Joestl; Nikolaus Lang; Adam Bukaty; Thomas M Tiefenboeck; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Review of CT-Based Fracture Risk Assessment with Finite Element Modeling and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.163

2.  Evaluation of Load-To-Strength Ratios in Metastatic Vertebrae and Comparison With Age- and Sex-Matched Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Michael W Groff; Thomas F Flood; Brett T Allaire; Roger B Davis; Marc A Stadelmann; Philippe K Zysset; Ron N Alkalay
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-05

3.  Electromyographic Comparison of an Abdominal Rise on a Ball with a Traditional Crunch.

Authors:  Aleš Dolenec; Mojca Svetina; Vojko Strojnik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.