Literature DB >> 36048257

Comparison of DNA preservation between adult and non-adult ancient skeletons.

Ariana Šuligoj1, Sara Mesesnel1, Tamara Leskovar2, Eva Podovšovnik3, Irena Zupanič Pajnič4.   

Abstract

Studies evaluating DNA preservation in non-adults, or comparing preservation in adults and non-adults, are very rare. This study compares the preservation of DNA in the skeletal remains of adults and non-adults. It compares the quality and quantity of DNA recovered from different skeletal elements of adults and non-adults, and from non-adults of different age classes. In addition, the preservation of DNA in males and females is compared. Bone DNA preservation was estimated by measuring nuclear DNA concentration and its degradation, and through STR typing success. The study analyzed 29 adult skeletons and 23 non-adult skeletons from the Ljubljana-Polje archeological site, dating from the seventeenth to nineteenth century, and up to four skeletal elements (petrous bone, femur, calcaneus, and talus) were included. After full demineralization extraction, the PowerQuant System and the PowerPlex ESI 17 Fast System (Promega) were used for qPCR and STR typing, respectively. The results showed that, among the four bone types analyzed, only the petrous bone proved to be a suitable source of DNA for STR typing of non-adult skeletal remains, and DNA yield is even higher than in the adult petrous bone, which can be attributed to the higher DNA degradation observed in the adult petrous bone. In adult skeletons, petrous bones and tali produced high STR amplification success and low DNA yield was observed in adult femurs. The results of this study are applicable for the sampling strategy in routine forensic genetics cases for solving identification cases, including badly preserved non-adult and also adult skeletons.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancient DNA; Bone sampling; Missing person identification; Non-adult skeletons; STR typing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36048257     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02881-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.791


  35 in total

1.  Age and sex bias in the reconstruction of past population structures.

Authors:  Silvia M Bello; Aminte Thomann; Michel Signoli; Olivier Dutour; Peter Andrews
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Intra-bone nuclear DNA variability in Second World War metatarsal and metacarpal bones.

Authors:  Jezerka Inkret; Eva Podovšovnik; Tomaž Zupanc; Gregor Haring; Irena Zupanič Pajnič
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Evaluating differential nuclear DNA yield rates and osteocyte numbers among human bone tissue types: A synchrotron radiation micro-CT approach.

Authors:  Janna M Andronowski; Amy Z Mundorff; Isaac V Pratt; Jon M Davoren; David M L Cooper
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  Intra- and Inter-Element Variability in Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA from Fresh and Environmentally Exposed Skeletal Remains.

Authors:  Timothy C Antinick; David R Foran
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Inter and intra-individual variation in skeletal DNA preservation in buried remains.

Authors:  Alexandra L Emmons; Jonathan Davoren; Jennifer M DeBruyn; Amy Z Mundorff
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  DNA analysis of thirty-eight years old stillborn's skeletal remains in case of disputed maternity.

Authors:  J Čakar; M Džehverović; A Pilav
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  The petrous bone: Ideal substrate in legal medicine?

Authors:  Angéla Gonzalez; Catherine Cannet; Vincent Zvénigorosky; Annie Geraut; Guillaume Koch; Tania Delabarde; Bertrand Ludes; Jean-Sébastien Raul; Christine Keyser
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  Human DNA quantification and sample quality assessment: Developmental validation of the PowerQuant(®) system.

Authors:  Margaret M Ewing; Jonelle M Thompson; Robert S McLaren; Vincent M Purpero; Kelli J Thomas; Patricia A Dobrowski; Gretchen A DeGroot; Erica L Romsos; Douglas R Storts
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.882

9.  Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory.

Authors:  Cristina Gamba; Eppie R Jones; Matthew D Teasdale; Russell L McLaughlin; Gloria Gonzalez-Fortes; Valeria Mattiangeli; László Domboróczki; Ivett Kővári; Ildikó Pap; Alexandra Anders; Alasdair Whittle; János Dani; Pál Raczky; Thomas F G Higham; Michael Hofreiter; Daniel G Bradley; Ron Pinhasi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum.

Authors:  Henrik B Hansen; Peter B Damgaard; Ashot Margaryan; Jesper Stenderup; Niels Lynnerup; Eske Willerslev; Morten E Allentoft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.