Literature DB >> 36046758

The effect of different insert design congruencies on the kinematics of a mobile bearing TKA: A cadaveric study.

Gianluca Castellarin1, Edoardo Bori2, Alessandra Menon3, Bernardo Innocenti2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty has proved to be a safe, effective and reproducible surgical treatment for patients with serious/advanced degenerative joint disease of the knee, but the optimal results after these implants can be achieved only if the joint kinematics and kinetics are carefully respected and not significantly altered after the replacement. In order to enhance the capability of matching the healthy configuration, therefore, different prosthesis models in terms of constraints and designs are available for the surgeons to choose among. As an example of this variety, mobile bearing models allow the surgeon to choose among different insert designs in terms of geometry and relative biomechanical approaches, with the relative performances depending on which one is adopted.This article aims to analyse the effect of different levels of congruency of mobile bearing inserts through an experimental activity performed on an ultra-congruent insert design, also referred as deep-dished.
Methods: The experimental activity followed the same protocol used in a previous study focused on the effect of symmetricity/asymmetricity (in order to allow a comparison among the results obtained), i.e. it analysed passive squat on 5 cadaveric knee specimens; internal-external rotations of femur and tibial insert respect to the tibia tray were thus measured via a motion capture system in order to compare the insert-femur relative rotation among the different congruency configurations.
Results: The overall knee kinematic (in terms of flexion-extension and internal-external rotation ranges of motion) with an ultra-congruent insert did not differ from the ones found for the other inserts; the insert-femur rotation values, instead, returned to be between the ones obtained with the other two inserts.
Conclusion: In terms of adaptability to tibio-femoral rotation, therefore, this insert represents a valid option for the surgeon seeking for an intermediate solution among the opposed approaches of the other two.
© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36046758      PMCID: PMC9421089          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  28 in total

1.  Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua T Carothers; Raymond H Kim; Douglas A Dennis; Carleton Southworth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies.

Authors:  P van der Voort; B G Pijls; K A Nouta; E R Valstar; W C H Jacobs; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after total knee arthroplasty using a rotating platform knee prosthesis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Colin D J Hopley; Lawrence S Crossett; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Søren T Skou; Ewa M Roos; Mogens B Laursen; Michael S Rathleff; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ole Simonsen; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Superior Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Fixed-Bearing: A Meta-analysis Based on a Minimum of 5 Years of Study.

Authors:  Kaiyang Wang; Fang Fang Zhang; Xu Yan; Yifan Shen; Weijie Cai; Jiaming Xu; Jiong Mei
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Holly Smith; Meryam Jan; Nizar N Mahomed; J Rod Davey; Rajiv Gandhi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The Outcome of Posterior-Stabilized, Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up, a Middle East Institution Experience.

Authors:  Ahmed A Khalifa; Mostafa Fayez; Hesham Elkady; Ahmed M Abdelaal; Maher A Elassal
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.501

Review 8.  No difference in clinical outcome between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Li; Qiang Wu; Guang-Zhi Ning; Shi-Qing Feng; Qiu-Li Wu; Yan Li; Yan Hao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Asymmetric polyethylene inserts promote favorable kinematics and better clinical outcome compared to symmetric inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gianluca Castellarin; Silvia Pianigiani; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.