| Literature DB >> 36043306 |
Hugh J Hanmer1, Philipp H Boersch-Supan1,2, Robert A Robinson1.
Abstract
Climate change affects the phenology of annual life cycle events of organisms, such as reproduction and migration. Shifts in the timing of these events could have important population implications directly, or provide information about the mechanisms driving population trajectories, especially if they differ between life cycle event. We examine if such shifts occur in a declining migratory passerine bird (willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus), which exhibits latitudinally diverging population trajectories. We find evidence of phenological shifts in breeding initiation, breeding progression and moult that differ across geographic and spring temperature gradients. Moult initiation following warmer springs advances faster in the south than in the north, resulting in proportionally shorter breeding seasons, reflecting higher nest failure rates in the south and in warmer years. Tracking shifts in multiple life cycle events allowed us to identify points of failure in the breeding cycle in regions where the species has negative population trends, thereby demonstrating the utility of phenology analyses for illuminating mechanistic pathways underlying observed population trajectories.Entities:
Keywords: annual cycle; breeding; climate change; moult; phenology; population change
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36043306 PMCID: PMC9428546 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Lett ISSN: 1744-9561 Impact factor: 3.812
Parameter estimates (mean and 95% confidence interval from a linear mixed-effects model and an Underhill–Zucchini moult model) for willow warbler life cycle events. Asterisk (*) indicates an interaction.
| life cycle event | intercept (female) | latitude (standardized) | sex (Male) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clutch initiation date | 133.6 | −1.3 | 2.2 | 0.1 | |
| (132.8–134.3) | (−2.5 – −0.5) | (1.4–3.0) | (−1.0–1.1) | ||
| moult duration | 37.3 | 2.7 | −0.9 | 0.9 | |
| (36.1–38.6) | (1.5–3.9) | (−2.2–0.4) | (−0.6–2.3) | ||
| moult initiation date | 182.2 | −1.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 | −7.0 |
| (181.6–183.8) | (−1.5 – −0.5) | (1.2–2.0) | (−0.1–0.9) | (−7.7 – −6.3) | |
| standard deviation in moult initiation date | 14.0 | −3.4 | |||
| (10.6–17.5) | (−6.0–−0.9) |
Parameter estimates (mean risk ratio and 95% confidence interval from mixed-effects probit model) for willow warbler life cycle events. Asterisk (*) indicates an interaction.
| intercept | ordinal day | latitude (standardized) | ordinal day * latitude | ordinal day * | latitude * | ordinal day * latitude * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brood patch re-feathering probability | 0.0003 (0.0002–0.0004) | 1.051 (1.048–1.053) | 0.675 (0.514–0.888) | 1.791 (1.096–2.926) | 1.002 (1.000–1.004) | 0.997 (0.994–1.000) | 0.918 (0.602–1.399) | 1.001 (0.999–1.003) |
Figure 1Willow warbler (a) breeding and moult phenology, (b) moult duration and (c) brood patch re-feathering probability at clutch completion with respect to spring temperature anomaly size (Ts), latitude and their interaction. Plotted lines show conditional effect estimates at five locations across the studied latitudinal range with 95% CIs based on the models in tables 1 and 2.