| Literature DB >> 36042630 |
Oliver Barachini1, Michaela Schaer1, Siroos Mirzaei2, Klaus Hergan3, Shahin Zandieh1,3.
Abstract
Radiomics (RC) was initially developed using computed tomography (CT) for oncological imaging. However, it can be applied to various scientific and clinical radiology fields regardless of the modalities involved. The purpose of this survey was to evaluate alterations in magnetic resonance imaging of the heart (CMR) in patients suffering from autoimmune thyroid disorders (AITD) by applying RC tools and mapping features. A total of 50 individuals were evaluated in this study. We searched for CMR examinations performed in our department between January 2019 and 2021 in patients with AITD. Thirty patients with AITD (21 men and 9 women, aged 51 to 78 years; mean age, 60 years) were enrolled in our survey. We enrolled a control group (CG) of 20 individuals (14 men and 6 women aged 53-87 years; mean age, 68 years) without AITD or cardiac disorders. Global native T1 and T2 mapping revealed no significant differences between groups. However, we identified significantly higher values of several texture parameters, including the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) entropy, gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM; short-run high gray-level emphasis (SRHGE), GLCM (Energy), gray-level size zone matrix length matrix (GLZLM; LZLGE), GLZLM (SZLGE), DISCRETIZED (HISTO-Energy) GLCM (Dissimilarity), and GLCM (Contrast), in patients with AITD in comparison to the CG (P < .01). Our results indicate that several RC properties extracted from CMR images can be used to discriminate between the AITD and CG groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36042630 PMCID: PMC9410693 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1.CMR 4-chamber view of the heart, analyzed by the LIFEx software user interface. The ROI of the septal wall has been used for radiomics feature computation.
Figure 2.Bland-Altman plots were prepared to assess the agreement between echocardiography and CMR measures of LVEF. Bland-Altman diagrams of LVEF demonstrating mean differences and limits of agreement between baseline echocardiography and CMR findings.
The mean CMR results of the AITD patients, and the CG are presented in the table.
| Mean TSH | EDV | ESV | SV | CI | LVEF | LVD | VST | MM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AITD | 3.4 mIU/l | 113.1 ± 45 | 65.5 ± 29 | 49.5 ± 23 | 2.7 ± 1 | 55.7 ± 10 | 5.5 ± 1 | 9 ± 3 | 90.2 ± 47 |
| CG | 2.2 mIU/l | 132.8 ± 55 | 92.6 ± 47 | 63.8 ± 22 | 2.6 ± 1 | 68.5 ± 12 | 6,3 ± 1 | 10.7 ± 3 | 97.8 ± 29 |
AITD = autoimmune thyroid disorder, CI = cardiac index, CG = Control subjects, EDV = end-diastolic volume, ESV = end-systolic volume, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, LVD = left ventricular diameter, LVMT = left ventricular myocardial thickness, MM = myocardial mass, SV = stroke volume, VST = ventricular septal thickness.
Figure 3.The diagram shows the distribution of the T1 and T2 mapping values and a comparison between the CG and AITD.
Figure 4.The diagram demonstrates the mean GL values between the CG and AITD.
Figure 5.The mean GLCM values are shown in the diagram.
Figure 6.Diagram of the radiomics features’ comparisons between the CG and AITD.