Literature DB >> 36042536

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption following COVID-19 in an adolescent boy: Case report and review of the literature.

Ayisha Mahama1, Priscilla Kojder2, Quinn Thibodeaux2, Jennifer Ruth3.   

Abstract

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) is a mucosal-predominant eruption that usually affects two or more mucosal sites. We present a case of RIME secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and provide a brief review of the literature with a focus on the natural history and response to treatment. This entity may require inpatient management and systemic corticosteroids for symptom control in the pediatric population.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; exanthema; mucositis; prednisone

Year:  2022        PMID: 36042536      PMCID: PMC9538754          DOI: 10.1111/pde.15122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol        ISSN: 0736-8046            Impact factor:   1.997


INTRODUCTION

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) is a reactive inflammatory mucositis that usually affects two or more mucosal sites. The term Mycoplasma pneumoniae‐induced rash and mucositis (MIRM) was previously used to describe this eruption; however, reports of MIRM caused by other bacterial and viral infections including Chlamydophila pneumoniae, enterovirus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, influenza B virus and parainfluenza virus 2 prompted a change in nomenclature. There are no published evidence‐based guidelines for the treatment of RIME. We report an additional pediatric case of RIME secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection and provide a review of the literature with a focus on the natural history and response to treatment.

CASE REPORT

A healthy 13‐year‐old Caucasian boy presented to the emergency department with a 5‐day history of painful oral erosions and ulcers and impaired oral intake. Two weeks prior to presentation, he had experienced a fever, sore throat, irritation and redness of the eyes, and swelling of the eyelids and lips. SARS‐Cov‐2 PCR at that time was positive, and he was diagnosed with COVID‐19. The dominant COVID‐19 strain during this time was Omicron, and he had previously received his second dose of the Pfizer COVID‐19 BNT1662b2 vaccine  8 months prior to his diagnosis. Despite resolution of his upper respiratory and ocular symptoms, his lip swelling had persisted and progressed to erosions and ulcerations (Figure 1), and a new erosion had developed on his urethral meatus. Laboratory evaluation revealed negative PCR swabs for herpes simplex virus 1/2 and varicella zoster virus, negative M. pneumoniae IgM titers, elevated M. pneumoniae IgG titers, negative respiratory PCR panel including M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, enterovirus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, influenza B parainfluenza 2, and positive SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG titers. His chest X‐ray was unremarkable. No mucosal biopsy was collected.
FIGURE 1

Diffuse erosion with hemorrhagic crusting of the patient's upper and lower mucosal lips

Diffuse erosion with hemorrhagic crusting of the patient's upper and lower mucosal lips The patient was diagnosed with COVID‐19‐associated RIME and admitted for fluid resuscitation and pain control. Topical triamcinolone 0.1% ointment and mouthwash containing viscous lidocaine 2%, diphenhydramine, and aluminum hydroxide with magnesium hydroxide failed to provide sufficient relief after 2 days. He was then started on oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day and experienced rapid improvement in his symptoms within 24 h. He was discharged after three total days in the hospital with a 5‐day prednisone taper. At outpatient pediatric dermatology follow‐up 2 weeks later, all lesions had completely resolved.

DISCUSSION

RIME is a recently proposed term to describe a spectrum of postinfectious mucocutaneous eruptions. Etiologies of this condition include M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, enterovirus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, influenza B, parainfluenza 2, and SARS‐CoV‐2. Diagnosis of RIME in the setting of COVID‐19 is challenging. In a recent series of 50 pediatric patients hospitalized with COVID‐19, 42% of patients had mucocutaneous findings. Diagnostic characteristics to help identify RIME include an erosive mucositis affecting at least two sites or vesiculobullous lesions/atypical targets involving less than 10% body surface area, and a noncontributory medication history. Supporting features are prodromal symptoms of an infectious trigger and histology excluding other diagnoses. There have been six reported pediatric cases of RIME induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (Table 1). , , , All reported patients were male, ranging from 13 to 17 years old, and all cases were confirmed by SARS‐Cov‐2 PCR. There was involvement of both the oral and genital mucosa in all patients, with the exception of one case by Song et al, which was presumed to be recurrent RIME with only oral mucosal involvement. None of the patients had other signs of cutaneous involvement. In a systematic review including 202 patients with MIRM, 47% of patients presented with sparse cutaneous involvement, 19% had moderate involvement, and 34% had no skin involvement. Data on the frequency of cutaneous involvement in RIME is lacking, so it is unclear if the absence of cutaneous involvement among these patients is characteristic of RIME or RIME induced by SARS‐CoV‐2. All six cases were treated with systemic corticosteroids, and five out of the six reported cases required hospitalization. Data on the frequency of hospitalization among patients with MIRM or RIME is lacking, but prominent mucositis is a major cause of morbidity and often leads to hospitalization for additional treatment and diagnostic testing.
TABLE 1

Summary of pediatric cases of RIME induced by COVID‐19

PublicationAge (years)/SexInvolved sitesType of diagnostic COVID‐19 testTime to lesion development from onset of COVID‐19 symptomsHospitalizationSystemic therapyDuration of systemic therapyTime to complete resolution after initiation of systemic therapy
Mahama et al.13/MLips, oral mucosa, glans penisSARS‐Cov‐2 PCR14 daysYes, 3 daysPrednisone (1 mg/kg/day PO for 6 days)6 days14 days
Bowe et al.14/MEyes, lips, oral mucosa, glans penisSARS‐Cov‐2 PCR9 daysYes, 14 daysHydrocortisone (100 mg IV three times a day for 3 days)At least 3 days21 days
Bowe et al.17/MEyes, lips, oral mucosa, glans penisSARS‐Cov‐2 PCR8 daysYes, 4 daysHydrocortisone (100 mg IV three times a day for 3 days)At least 3 days11 days
Holcomb et al.17/MLips, oral mucosa, glans penisSARS‐Cov‐2 PCR3 daysYes, N/APrednisone (1 mg/kg/day PO for 4 days)4 days
Song et al.15/MLips, oral mucosaSARS‐Cov‐2 PCR3 daysNoPrednisone (30 mg PO for 3 days, 20 mg PO for 3 days, 10 mg PO for 5 days)11 days
Ryder et al.17/M

Lips, oral mucosa (1st visit)

Lips, nares, and glans penis (2nd visit)

SARS‐Cov‐2 PCR

7 days

17 days

Yes, 5 daysMethylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days), then prednisone (1 mg/kg/day for at least 2 days)At least 5 days
Yes, 5 days

Methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day IV for at least 5 days)

Cyclosporine (4 mg/kg/day PO for at least 5 days)

At least 5 days

At least 5 days

7 days
Summary of pediatric cases of RIME induced by COVID‐19 Lips, oral mucosa (1st visit) Lips, nares, and glans penis (2nd visit) 7 days 17 days Methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day IV for at least 5 days) Cyclosporine (4 mg/kg/day PO for at least 5 days) At least 5 days At least 5 days Treatment of RIME, regardless of the infectious trigger, is not standardized. Due to the self‐limited nature of RIME, supportive care is a cornerstone of management and includes pain control, nutritional support, and wound care. Topical and systemic corticosteroids are first‐line therapies used to truncate the inflammatory response, although there is a lack of prospective data. Targeted antibiotic therapy can be used to address specific underlying infections, and rarely immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine and etanercept have been used for severe cases. , It is unclear if antiviral COVID‐19 therapies such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir will have any effect on the incidence and natural history of RIME. However, given the historical use of antibiotics for the treatment of RIME induced by bacterial infections, further studies should be completed on the utility of these antiviral therapies in COVID‐19‐induced RIME. It has been reported that approximately 35% of M. pneumoniae‐induced RIME cases are treated with systemic corticosteroids. In our review of RIME cases induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, all six patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids and five of six were treated in the hospital setting. Though there are a limited number of cases reported in the literature, these findings suggest that RIME associated with COVID‐19 may more frequently require inpatient management and the use of systemic corticosteroids for symptom control. Our patient was fully vaccinated at the time and received his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine 8 months prior to developing RIME; however, vaccination status was not provided in the other reported cases. Inclusion of vaccination status may be helpful in future reports to correlate to clinical severity.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

CONSENT

We obtained informed consent from the patient's mother to publish the patient's information and pictures. Abbreviation: RIME, reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis as a syndrome distinct from Stevens-Johnson syndrome and erythema multiforme: a systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa N Canavan; Erin F Mathes; Ilona Frieden; Kanade Shinkai
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Evaluation of Etanercept for Treatment of Reactive Infectious Mucocutaneous Eruption.

Authors:  Melanie M Miller; Sonia Kamath; Meagan Hughes; Nicole Harter; Minnelly Luu
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Blistering severe cutaneous adverse reactions in children: proposal for paediatric-focused clinical criteria.

Authors:  M L Ramien; A Bahubeshi; I Lara-Corrales; E Pope; M L Levy; A J Nopper; N H Shear; L Eichenfield
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Reactive Infectious Mucocutaneous Eruption Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Zachary E Holcomb; Sadaf Hussain; Jennifer T Huang; Sophia Delano
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  Mucocutaneous Eruptions in Acutely Ill Pediatric Patients-Think of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (and Other Infections) First.

Authors:  Michele L Ramien; Anna L Bruckner
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 6.  Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption: Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis and other parainfectious eruptions.

Authors:  M L Ramien
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.470

7.  Treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-Induced Rash and Mucositis With Cyclosporine [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Heidi Oi-Yee Li; Sophia Colantonio; Michele L Ramien
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.092

8.  Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption secondary to SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  C Yoonhee Ryder; Elisabeth A Pedersen; Jennifer B Mancuso
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2021-10-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption following COVID-19 in an adolescent boy: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ayisha Mahama; Priscilla Kojder; Quinn Thibodeaux; Jennifer Ruth
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 1.997

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.