Hachem Saddiki1, Elena Colicino1, Corina Lesseur2. 1. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. corina.lesseur@mssm.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: DNA methylation (DNAm) is essential to human development and plays an important role as a biomarker due to its susceptibility to environmental exposures. This article reviews the current state of statistical methods developed for differential variability analysis focusing on DNAm data. RECENT FINDINGS: With the advent of high-throughput technologies allowing for highly reliable and cost-effective measurements of DNAm, many epigenome studies have analyzed DNAm levels to uncover biological mechanisms underlying past environmental exposures and subsequent health outcomes. These studies typically focused on detecting sites or regions which differ in their mean DNAm levels among exposure groups. However, more recent studies highlighted the importance of identifying differentially variable sites or regions as biologically relevant features. Currently, the analysis of differentially variable DNAm sites has not yet gained widespread adoption in environmental studies; yet, it is important to examine the effects of environmental exposures on inter-individual epigenetic variability. In this article, we describe six of the most widely used statistical approaches for analyzing differential variability of DNAm levels and provide a discussion of their advantages and current limitations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: DNA methylation (DNAm) is essential to human development and plays an important role as a biomarker due to its susceptibility to environmental exposures. This article reviews the current state of statistical methods developed for differential variability analysis focusing on DNAm data. RECENT FINDINGS: With the advent of high-throughput technologies allowing for highly reliable and cost-effective measurements of DNAm, many epigenome studies have analyzed DNAm levels to uncover biological mechanisms underlying past environmental exposures and subsequent health outcomes. These studies typically focused on detecting sites or regions which differ in their mean DNAm levels among exposure groups. However, more recent studies highlighted the importance of identifying differentially variable sites or regions as biologically relevant features. Currently, the analysis of differentially variable DNAm sites has not yet gained widespread adoption in environmental studies; yet, it is important to examine the effects of environmental exposures on inter-individual epigenetic variability. In this article, we describe six of the most widely used statistical approaches for analyzing differential variability of DNAm levels and provide a discussion of their advantages and current limitations.
Authors: Mario F Fraga; Esteban Ballestar; Maria F Paz; Santiago Ropero; Fernando Setien; Maria L Ballestar; Damia Heine-Suñer; Juan C Cigudosa; Miguel Urioste; Javier Benitez; Manuel Boix-Chornet; Abel Sanchez-Aguilera; Charlotte Ling; Emma Carlsson; Pernille Poulsen; Allan Vaag; Zarko Stephan; Tim D Spector; Yue-Zhong Wu; Christoph Plass; Manel Esteller Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew E Teschendorff; Allison Jones; Heidi Fiegl; Alexandra Sargent; Joanna J Zhuang; Henry C Kitchener; Martin Widschwendter Journal: Genome Med Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Kasper Daniel Hansen; Winston Timp; Héctor Corrada Bravo; Sarven Sabunciyan; Benjamin Langmead; Oliver G McDonald; Bo Wen; Hao Wu; Yun Liu; Dinh Diep; Eirikur Briem; Kun Zhang; Rafael A Irizarry; Andrew P Feinberg Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-06-26 Impact factor: 38.330