| Literature DB >> 36040512 |
August Sigle1,2, Jakob Michaelis3, Dominik Schöb3, Matthias Benndorf4, Lars Schimmöller5, Benedikt Becker6, Maximilian Pallauf7,8,9, Andreas J Gross6, Thomas R W Herrmann10,11,12, Jan-Thorsten Klein13, Lukas Lusuardi14, Christopher Netsch6, Axel Häcker15, Jens Westphal16, Cordula Jilg3, Christian Gratzke3, Arkadiusz Miernik3.
Abstract
The recommendations on carrying out a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the primary diagnostics and during active surveillance of prostate cancer, include as a consequence an image-guided sampling from conspicuous areas. In doing so, the information on the localization provided by mpMRI is used for a targeted biopsy of the area suspected of being a tumor. The targeted sampling is mainly performed under sonographic control and after fusion of MRI and ultrasound but can also be (mostly in special cases) carried out directly in the MRI scanner. In an ultrasound-guided biopsy, it is vital to coregister the MR images with the ultrasound images (segmentation of the contour of the prostate and registration of suspect findings). This coregistration can either be carried out cognitively (transfer by the person performing the biopsy alone) or software based. Each method shows specific advantages and disadvantages in the prioritization between diagnostic accuracy and resource expenditure.Entities:
Keywords: Fusion biopsy; Guidelines; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Transperineal
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36040512 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01929-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urologie ISSN: 2731-7064