Literature DB >> 36040512

[Image-guided biopsy of the prostate gland].

August Sigle1,2, Jakob Michaelis3, Dominik Schöb3, Matthias Benndorf4, Lars Schimmöller5, Benedikt Becker6, Maximilian Pallauf7,8,9, Andreas J Gross6, Thomas R W Herrmann10,11,12, Jan-Thorsten Klein13, Lukas Lusuardi14, Christopher Netsch6, Axel Häcker15, Jens Westphal16, Cordula Jilg3, Christian Gratzke3, Arkadiusz Miernik3.   

Abstract

The recommendations on carrying out a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the primary diagnostics and during active surveillance of prostate cancer, include as a consequence an image-guided sampling from conspicuous areas. In doing so, the information on the localization provided by mpMRI is used for a targeted biopsy of the area suspected of being a tumor. The targeted sampling is mainly performed under sonographic control and after fusion of MRI and ultrasound but can also be (mostly in special cases) carried out directly in the MRI scanner. In an ultrasound-guided biopsy, it is vital to coregister the MR images with the ultrasound images (segmentation of the contour of the prostate and registration of suspect findings). This coregistration can either be carried out cognitively (transfer by the person performing the biopsy alone) or software based. Each method shows specific advantages and disadvantages in the prioritization between diagnostic accuracy and resource expenditure.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusion biopsy; Guidelines; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Transperineal

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040512     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01929-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologie        ISSN: 2731-7064


  8 in total

1.  mpMRI of the Prostate (MR-Prostatography): Updated Recommendations of the DRG and BDR on Patient Preparation and Scanning Protocol.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Patrick Asbach; Dirk Beyersdorff; Dirk Blondin; Sascha Kaufmann; Ullrich Gerd Mueller-Lisse; Michael Quentin; Stefan Rödel; Matthias Röthke; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Lars Schimmöller
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2021-03-18

2.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Safety and side effects of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  August Sigle; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Marian Pudimat; Jakob Michaelis; Cordula A Jilg; Arkadiusz Miernik; Markus T Grabbert; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Christian Gratzke; Daniel Schlager
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective analysis.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Giovanni Lughezzani; Davide Maffei; Andrea Sánchez; José Gregorio Pereira; Frédéric Staerman; Hannes Cash; Ferdinand Luger; Laurent Lopez; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Rob Abouassaly; Neal D Shore; Gregg Eure; Marco Paciotti; Ander Astobieta; Laura Wiemer; Sebastian Hofbauer; Robin Heckmann; Andreas Gusenleitner; Jasmin Kaar; Clemens Mayr; Wolfgang Loidl; Jean Rouffilange; Richard Gaston; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Klein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Umbra, Penumbra, and Value of Perilesional Sampling.

Authors:  Wayne G Brisbane; Alan M Priester; Jorge Ballon; Lorna Kwan; Merdie K Delfin; Ely R Felker; Anthony E Sisk; Jim C Hu; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 24.267

Review 6.  Characterisation of Prostate Lesions Using Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) Ultrasound Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thineskrishna Anbarasan; Cheng Wei; Jeffrey C Bamber; Richard G Barr; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Impact of Surgeon's Experience in Rigid versus Elastic MRI/TRUS-Fusion Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted and Systematic Cores.

Authors:  Magdalena Görtz; Joanne Nyaboe Nyarangi-Dix; Lars Pursche; Viktoria Schütz; Philipp Reimold; Constantin Schwab; Albrecht Stenzinger; Holger Sültmann; Stefan Duensing; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Bonekamp; Markus Hohenfellner; Jan Philipp Radtke
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Comprehensive analysis of complications after transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis: results of a multicenter trial with 30 days' follow-up.

Authors:  Tobias Kohl; August Sigle; Timur Kuru; Johannes Salem; Hanjo Rolfs; Tobias Kowalke; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Jakob Michaelis; Nadine Binder; Cordula A Jilg; Arkadiusz Miernik; Markus T Grabbert; W Schultze-Seemann; Christian Gratzke; Daniel Porres
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.455

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.