Thineskrishna Anbarasan1, Cheng Wei2, Jeffrey C Bamber3, Richard G Barr4, Ghulam Nabi2. 1. College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK. 2. Academic Section of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK. 3. Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UK. 4. Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE) can non-invasively assess prostate tissue stiffness. This systematic review aims to evaluate SWE for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and compare diagnostic estimates between studies reporting the detection of all PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). METHODS: a literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CINAHL databases. Studies evaluating SWE for the detection of PCa using histopathology as reference standard were included. RESULTS: 16 studies including 2277 patients were included for review. Nine studies evaluated SWE for the detection of PCa using systematic biopsy as a reference standard at the per-sample level, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI = 0.74-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.75-0.91), respectively. Five studies evaluated SWE for the detection of PCa using histopathology of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.55-0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.42-0.92), respectively. Sub-group analysis revealed a higher pooled sensitivity (0.77 vs. 0.62) and specificity (0.84 vs. 0.53) for detection of csPCa compared to all PCa among studies using RP specimens as the reference standard. CONCLUSION: SWE is an attractive imaging modality for the detection of PCa.
BACKGROUND: ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE) can non-invasively assess prostate tissue stiffness. This systematic review aims to evaluate SWE for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and compare diagnostic estimates between studies reporting the detection of all PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). METHODS: a literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CINAHL databases. Studies evaluating SWE for the detection of PCa using histopathology as reference standard were included. RESULTS: 16 studies including 2277 patients were included for review. Nine studies evaluated SWE for the detection of PCa using systematic biopsy as a reference standard at the per-sample level, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI = 0.74-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.75-0.91), respectively. Five studies evaluated SWE for the detection of PCa using histopathology of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.55-0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.42-0.92), respectively. Sub-group analysis revealed a higher pooled sensitivity (0.77 vs. 0.62) and specificity (0.84 vs. 0.53) for detection of csPCa compared to all PCa among studies using RP specimens as the reference standard. CONCLUSION: SWE is an attractive imaging modality for the detection of PCa.
Authors: August Sigle; Jakob Michaelis; Dominik Schöb; Matthias Benndorf; Lars Schimmöller; Benedikt Becker; Maximilian Pallauf; Andreas J Gross; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jan-Thorsten Klein; Lukas Lusuardi; Christopher Netsch; Axel Häcker; Jens Westphal; Cordula Jilg; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik Journal: Urologie Date: 2022-08-30