| Literature DB >> 36040013 |
Todd A Castoe1, David D Pollock2, Elizabeth J Carlton3, Andrea J Lund3, Kristen J Wade2, Zachary L Nikolakis1, Kathleen N Ivey1, Blair W Perry1, Hamish N C Pike2, Sara H Paull3, Yang Liu4.
Abstract
The global community has adopted ambitious goals to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem, and new tools are needed to achieve them. Mass drug administration programs, for example, have reduced the burden of schistosomiasis, but the identification of hotspots of persistent and reemergent transmission threaten progress toward elimination and underscore the need to couple treatment with interventions that reduce transmission. Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies make whole-genome sequencing a valuable and increasingly feasible option for population-based studies of complex parasites such as schistosomes. Here, we focus on leveraging genomic data to tailor interventions to distinct social and ecological circumstances. We consider two priority questions that can be addressed by integrating epidemiological, ecological, and genomic information: (1) how often do non-human host species contribute to human schistosome infection? and (2) what is the importance of locally acquired versus imported infections in driving transmission at different stages of elimination? These questions address processes that can undermine control programs, especially those that rely heavily on treatment with praziquantel. Until recently, these questions were difficult to answer with sufficient precision to inform public health decision-making. We review the literature related to these questions and discuss how whole-genome approaches can identify the geographic and taxonomic sources of infection, and how such information can inform context-specific efforts that advance schistosomiasis control efforts and minimize the risk of reemergence.Entities:
Keywords: disease control; epidemiology; genetics; genomics; global health; one health; population genetics; schistosomiasis; surveillance; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36040013 PMCID: PMC9427098 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.79320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Elife ISSN: 2050-084X Impact factor: 8.713
Figure 1.A framework for tailoring schistosomiasis control interventions to target key drivers of infection.
The involvement of multiple definitive host species and the degree to which transmission occurs at local to regional geographic scales influences which interventions are most likely to be effective. Mass drug administration (MDA) is currently the primary intervention used to control schistosomiasis. We argue it is most effective at reducing the burden of schistosomiasis if infections are confined to human hosts and are acquired locally (light blue arrows). If humans are the only definitive hosts involved but human movement connects multiple transmission sites, additional environmental interventions that control transmission may be necessary to avoid post-treatment resurgence and/or re-introduction via host movement (dark blue arrows). Environmental interventions include the provision of safe sanitation to reduce the emissions of schistosomes into the environment, snail control to reduce the asexual replication of schistosomes in the environment, and the provision of abundant, cercaria-free water supplies to reduce exposure through water contact. If multiple definitive host species are involved in transmission, veterinary interventions that target non-human hosts (e.g., livestock treatment or surveillance of wildlife populations) should be layered onto MDA if infections are acquired locally (yellow arrows) or implemented in combination with MDA and environmental interventions if infections are acquired across regional scales (red arrows).
Number of studies of schistosomiasis epidemiology employing molecular methods by data generation method, study question, and study scale.
| Data generation method | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsatellite | mtDNA/rDNA | RAD/Exome/WGS | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Population structure | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Hybridization | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| Drug resistance | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Host species identification | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Lineage origins/diversification | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Morbidity/phenotype | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Transmission persistence | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Worm natural history | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 47* |
Study scale abbreviations: LAB = laboratory study; LOC = local scale (tens of km; neighboring villages); REG = regional scale (hundreds of km; neighboring countries); CON = continental scale (thousands of km; non-neighboring countries). Categories informed by those used by Rey et al., 2021a; *Adding totals across question types and generation methods exceeds 47 because some studies employed multiple data generation methods (e.g., they use both microsatellites and mtDNA markers) and/or addressed multiple types of questions (e.g., population structure and host species identification). Search terms used to identify these studies are provided in Appendix 1. A list of all studies included in this table is provided in Supplementary file 1 and another version of this table that lists which studies are counted in which cells is provided in Supplementary file 2.