| Literature DB >> 19521532 |
Darren J Gray1, Gail M Williams, Yuesheng Li, Honggen Chen, Simon J Forsyth, Robert S Li, Adrian G Barnett, Jiagang Guo, Allen G Ross, Zheng Feng, Donald P McManus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zoonotic schistosomiasis japonica is a major public health problem in China. Bovines, particularly water buffaloes, are thought to play a major role in the transmission of schistosomiasis to humans in China. Preliminary results (1998-2003) of a praziquantel (PZQ)-based pilot intervention study we undertook provided proof of principle that water buffaloes are major reservoir hosts for S. japonicum in the Poyang Lake region, Jiangxi Province. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19521532 PMCID: PMC2690852 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Human infection rates (* replacement village pair).
| Province | Hunan | Jiangxi | ||||||
| Pair | Pair 1 | Pair 2 | Pair 3 | Pair 4* | ||||
| Village Status | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention |
| Administrative Village | Yongxiang | Mengjiang | Jizhong | Yongfu | Fuqian | Xindong | Yu Feng | Cao Jia |
|
| ||||||||
| Sentinel Cohort # | 363 | 335 | 467 | 334 | 671 | 751 | 415 | 441 |
| Prevalence | 7.7% (5.0–10.5) | 8.7% (5.6–11.7) | 13.9% (10.8–17.1) | 18.9% (14.6–23.1) | 11.9% (9.5–14.4) | 13.8% (11.4–16.3) | 19.8% (16.0–23.7) | 13.2% (10.0–16.4) |
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 7.2 (5.6–9.2) | 8.1 (6.1–10.8) | 9.1 (7.2–11.4) | 13.3 (9.8–18.0) | 10.8 (8.6–13.6) | 27.4 (20.3–36.9) | 37.7 (26.6–53.3) | 22.4 (16.0–31.4) |
|
| ||||||||
| Sentinel Cohort # | 296 | 273 | 336 | 276 | 623 | 705 | 295 | 360 |
| Incidence | 4.4% (2.0–6.7) | 6.2% (3.3–9.1) | 6.8% (4.1–9.6) | 9.4% (6.0–12.9) | 11.4% (8.9–13.9) | 9.8% (7.6–12.0) | 23.4% (18.5–28.2) | 1.9% (0.5–3.4) |
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 8.9 (5.9–13.4) | 12.1 (6.9–21.1) | 12.1 (6.8–21.4) | 14.2 (7.8–25.8) | 6.8 (5.8–7.9) | 46.0 (33.8–62.4) | 24.5 (16.9–35.6) | 14.0 (7.1–27.6) |
|
| ||||||||
| Sentinel Cohort # | 270 | 239 | 282 | 226 | 575 | 639 | 216 | 294 |
| Incidence | 1.9% (0.2–3.5) | 1.7% (0.0–3.3) | 2.5% (0.7–4.3) | 1.3% (0.0–2.8) | 8.9% (6.5–11.2) | 7.4% (5.3–9.4) | 18.1% (12.9–23.2) | 2.0 (0.4–3.7) |
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 5.5 (3.4–8.8) | 6.5 (2.7–15.5) | 22.9 (2.7–197.2) | 6.0 (1.2–29.0) | 10.1 (8.0–12.8) | 47.0 (28.0–79.1) | 13.2 (9.8–17.9) | 13.8 (5.0–37.7) |
|
| ||||||||
| Sentinel Cohort # | 208 | 200 | 260 | 195 | 538 | 603 | ||
| Incidence | 0.5% (0.0–1.4) | 0.5% (0.0–1.5) | 2.7% (0.7–4.7) | 1.5% (0.0–3.3) | 10.6% (8.0–13.2) | 5.5% (3.7–7.3) | ||
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 8.3 (N/A) | 4.2 (N/A) | 4.6 (3.6–5.9) | 6.0 (1.2–29.0) | 13.5 (10.4–17.4) | 48.6 (28.9–82.0) | ||
Bovine infection rates and treatment coverage (* replacement village pair).
| Province | Hunan | Jiangxi | ||||||
| Pair | Pair 1 | Pair 2 | Pair 3 | Pair 4* | ||||
| Village Status | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention |
| Administrative Village | Yongxiang | Mengjiang | Jizhong | Yongfu | Fuqian | Xindong | Yu Feng | Cao Jia |
|
| ||||||||
| n | 63 | 59 | 82 | 88 | 233 | 230 | 108 | 59 |
| Prevalence | 25.4% (14.3–36.4) | 28.8% (16.9–40.7) | 29.3% (19.2–39.3) | 18.2% (10.0–26.4) | 15.9% (11.2–20.6) | 12.2% (7.9–16.4) | 10.2% (4.4–16.0) | 13.6% (4.6–22.6) |
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 4.9 (2.6–9.3) | 5.5 (2.6–11.7) | 7.2 (5–10.4) | 3.4 (1.8–6.7) | 1.9 (1.4–2.5) | 0.8 (0.45–1.5) | 2.1 (1.3–3.4) | 0.5 (0.4–0.6) |
| Tx Coverage | 38.2% | 100% | 33% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
|
| ||||||||
| n | 54 | 96 | 64 | 92 | 253 | 311 | 93 | 62 |
| Infection Rate | 25.9% (13.9–38.0) | 17.2% (7.7–26.7) | 25.0% (14.1–35.9) | 15.2% (7.7–22.7) | 13.4% (9.2–17.7) | 9.3% (6.1–12.6) | 14.0% (6.8–21.2) | 4.8% (0.0–10.3) |
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 1.9 (1.2–2.9) | 4.0 (1.8–8.7) | 3.3 (1.9–5.9) | 4.2 (2.2–8.1) | 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | 0.8 (0.5–1.4) | 0.2 (N/A) |
| Tx Coverage | 37.5% | 90.7% | 53.8% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
|
| ||||||||
| n | 57 | 68 | 131 | 136 | 234 | 374 | 124 | 34 |
| Infection Rate | 26.3% (14.5–38.1) | 17.6% (8.4–26.9) | 24.4% (17.0–31.9) | 11.8% (6.3–17.2) | 10.7% (6.7–14.7) | 1.6% (0.3–2.9) | 12.9% (6.9–18.9) | 2.9% (0.0–8.9) |
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 1.6 (0.9–2.9) | N/A | 2.0 (1.4–2.9) | 1.5 (1.0–2.2) | 1.9 (1.6–2.4) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | 1.4 (0.9–2.0) | 0.0 (N/A) |
| Tx Coverage | 0% | 93.4% | 0% | 92.1% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
|
| ||||||||
| n | 46 | 61 | 114 | 127 | 195 | 436 | ||
| Infection Rate | 28.3% (14.7–41.8) | 16.4% (6.8–25.6) | 18.4% (11.2–25.6) | 11.0% (5.5–16.5) | 12.3% (7.7–17.0) | 0.5% (0.0–1.1) | ||
| Geometric Mean EPG in Infected | 1.3 (0.5–3.4) | 1.6 (0.9–3.0) | 1.6 (1.1–2.3) | 1.2 (0.8–1.7) | 2.3 (1.8–2.8) | 0.1 (N/A ) | ||
| Tx Coverage | 0% | 94.2% | 0% | 76.9% | 0% | 100% | ||
Figure 1Trial profile.
Figure 2Yearly relative risks.
Relative risks for each year of follow-up for Hunan province, Jiangxi province, and both provinces combined.
Figure 3Overall relative risks.
Relative risks for all years of follow-up for Hunan province, Jiangxi province, and both provinces combined.