Literature DB >> 36038667

Less risk of conversion to total knee arthroplasty without significant clinical and survivorship difference for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies in varus knee deformities at 10-year minimum follow-up compared to closing-wedge high tibial osteotomies.

A Cazor1, A Schmidt2, J Shatrov3,4,5, T Alqahtani1, P Neyret6, Elliot Sappey-Marinier1, C Batailler1, S Lustig1,7, E Servien1,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of patients undergoing primary valgisation high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial osteoarthritis (OA), treated by Opening-Wedge HTO (OW-HTO) or Closing-Wedge HTO (CW-HTO).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to a single institution undergoing HTO for isolated medial compartment OA. Two hundred and twenty three HTOs for isolated medial tibio-femoral OA were performed between January 2002 and December 2010. Patients were eligible if they had minimum 10-year follow-up and received either a CW or OW-HTO. Fifteen (6.7%) patients died and twenty-five (11.2%) were lost to follow-up. One hundred and eighty three (82.1%) patients were included in the final analysis and divided into two groups: OW-HTO (96/183; 52.4%) and CW-HTO (87/183; 47.6%). Range of motion, KSS, KOOS scores, and conversion to TKA rate were analyzed between groups. Both groups were comparable regarding age, arthrosis stage, gender, ASA score and BMI at the time of HTO. Survival analysis was conducted with re-intervention for TKA as the end point.
RESULTS: At the time of HTO, mean age was 55 years ± 7.9 (27-73.9) with 72.7% of patients being male. The mean follow-up was 13.3 years ± 2.7 (10-19). Sixty-four (34.9%) patients underwent TKA at a mean delay of 9.3 years ± 3 (3-16). The conversion to TKA rate was significantly higher in the CW-HTO group versus the OW-HTO group: 42.5% (37/87) versus 28.1% (27/96) (p = 0.04). The survival at 15-year follow-up was 59.2% in the OW-HTO group versus 54.6% in the CW-HTO group (n.s.). At 13-year follow-up, KSS Function score was significantly better in the OW-HTO (90.9 versus 82.4; p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the KOOS score, KSS Knee Score and complication rate.
CONCLUSION: At mean follow-up of 13 years, no significant clinical and survivorship difference was observed between the two groups. The conversion to TKA was significantly lower following OW-HTO. Minor correction was associated with risk of requiring subsequent TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, IV.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closing-wedge; Conversion to total knee arthroplasty; High tibial osteotomy; Knee osteoarthritis; Long-term follow-up; Opening-wedge

Year:  2022        PMID: 36038667     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07122-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  38 in total

1.  High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Roberto Buzzi; Luca Maria Vena; Andrea Baldini; Alessandro Mondaini
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Gerrit Bode; Johanna von Heyden; Jan Pestka; Hagen Schmal; Gian Salzmann; Norbert Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  S Akizuki; A Shibakawa; T Takizawa; I Yamazaki; H Horiuchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-05

4.  Midterm follow-up of opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Patrick J DeMeo; Eric M Johnson; Peter P Chiang; Angela M Flamm; Mark C Miller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Comparison of closing-wedge and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial with a six-year follow-up.

Authors:  T Duivenvoorden; R W Brouwer; A Baan; P K Bos; M Reijman; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; J A N Verhaar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy, a reliable procedure for osteoarthritic varus knee.

Authors:  M Berruto; A Maione; D Tradati; P Ferrua; F M Uboldi; E Usellini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [X-ray classification and examination technics in gonarthrosis].

Authors:  S Ahlbäck; J Rydberg
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1980-05-28

8.  Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a comparison of opening and closing wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Ricardo Bastos Filho; Robert A Magnussen; Victoria Duthon; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; José Mauro Granjeiro; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases].

Authors:  J Caton; G Deschamps; P Chambat; J L Lerat; H Dejour
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1982

10.  Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Decreases Medial Meniscal Extrusion and Improves Clinical Outcomes and Return to Activity.

Authors:  Diego Costa Astur; Joao Victor Novaretti; Marcelo Lins Gomes; Adilson Góes Rodrigues; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Elton Luiz Batista Cavalcante; Pedro Debieux; Joicemar Tarouco Amaro; Moises Cohen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Kinematic alignment fails to achieve balancing in 50% of varus knees and resects more bone compared to functional alignment.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Cécile Batailler; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Stanislas Gunst; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.114

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.