| Literature DB >> 36035959 |
Simonetta Genovesi1,2, Laura Montelisciani1, Francesca Viazzi3, Marco Giussani2, Giulia Lieti1, Ilenia Patti1, Antonina Orlando2, Laura Antolini1, Paolo Salvi2, Gianfranco Parati2.
Abstract
Several studies describe the association between serum uric acid (SUA) and arterial stiffness in adults. Uric acid contributes through several mechanisms to the increase in blood pressure (BP) and adversely affects the insulin signaling pathway. Moreover, SUA predict the development of hypertension and insulin resistance up to type 2 diabetes. Early arterial stiffening, estimated by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), may already be present in pediatric age. Aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between SUA and PWV in a pediatric population and its interaction with insulin resistance and BP. In 322 children and adolescents (56.2% male, mean age 11.3 [SD 2.8] years), we measured weight, height, waist circumference, BP and PWV. We also assayed SUA and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and calculated HOMA-index as a marker of insulin resistance. Simple and multiple regression analyses were performed to assess variables associated with PWV. Mediation models were applied to identify the direct and indirect effects of individual variables on PWV. On univariate analysis, age (p < 0.001), waist circumference-to-height ratio (p = 0.036), systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) z-score (p < 0.001), heart rate (p = 0.028), SUA (p = 0.002), HOMA-index (p < 0.001), and eGFR (p = 0.014) were significantly associated with PWV. The multiple regression model showed that only age (p = 0.028), SBP z-score (p = 0.006), and heart rate (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with PWV. The results were superimposable when the DBP z-score replaced the SBP z-score in the model. Mediation models showed that the effect of eGFR on PWV was fully mediated by SUA (p = 0.015) and that the effect of SUA on PWV was totally mediated by HOMA-index (p < 0.001). Both SUA (p < 0.01) and HOMA-index (p < 0.01) had a significant association with higher SBP (DBP) z-scores. The double mediation model including both BP and HOMA-index showed that the SUA effect on PWV was totally mediated by both variables (p = 0.005, for HOMA-index, p = 0.004, for SBP z-score and p = 0.007, for combined effect). The results were superimposable when the DBP z-score replaced the SBP z-score in the model. In conclusion, insulin resistance and BP are both important mediators of the association between SUA and vascular stiffness in pediatric age.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; children; insulin resistance; mediation analysis; pulse wave velocity; uric acid
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035959 PMCID: PMC9403185 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.978366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the study population.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 11.30 | 2.81 | 11.62 | 2.68 | 10.89 | 2.93 | 0.022 |
| SD | SD | SD | |||||
| Puberty Yes | 156 (48.60) | 0.03 | 81 (45.00) | 0.04 | 75 (51.19) | 0.40 | 0.145 |
| Weight (kg) | 55.96 | 19.91 | 59.63 | 20.98 | 51.26 | 17.42 | <0.001 |
| Height (m) | 1.48 | 0.16 | 1.52 | 0.17 | 1.44 | 0.15 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.66 | 5.04 | 25.11 | 5.24 | 24.08 | 4.74 | 0.069 |
| BMI | 1.53 | 0.96 | 1.57 | 0.99 | 1.47 | 0.92 | 0.401 |
| Weight class | SD | SD | SD | 0.733 | |||
| Normal Weight | 64 (19.88) | 0.02 | 34 (18.78) | 0.03 | 30 (21.28) | 0.03 | |
| Over Weight | 98 (30.43) | 0.03 | 58 (32.04) | 0.03 | 40 (28.37) | 0.04 | |
| Obese | 160 (49.69) | 0.03 | 89 (49.17) | 0.04 | 71 (50.35) | 0.04 | |
| WC (cm) | 78.82 | 13.48 | 81.45 | 14.14 | 75.42 | 11.77 | <0.001 |
| WtHr (%) | 53.17 | 7.13 | 53.71 | 7.22 | 52.48 | 6.99 | 0.131 |
| WtHr>50% | 225 (70.98) | 0.03 | 134 (74.86) | 0.03 | 91 (65.94) | 0.04 | 0.083 |
| SBP office (mmHg) | 112.17 | 14.89 | 113.52 | 14.60 | 110.43 | 15.13 | 0.064 |
| DBP office (mmHg) | 66.12 | 9.72 | 65.90 | 9.05 | 66.40 | 10.56 | 0.645 |
| SBP (z-score) | 0.61 | 1.05 | 0.59 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 1.09 | 0.742 |
| DBP (z-score) | 0.36 | 0.77 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 0.43 | 0.82 | 0.155 |
| Blood Pressure Category | SD | SD | SD | 0.668 | |||
| Normotensive | 236 (72.67) | 0.02 | 134 (74.03) | 0.03 | 100 (70.92) | 0.04 | |
| High Normal | 31 (9.63) | 0.02 | 18 (9.94) | 0.02 | 13 (9.22) | 0.02 | |
| Hypertensive | 57 (17.70) | 0.02 | 29 (16.02) | 0.03 | 28 (19.86) | 0.03 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.56 | 0.14 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.13 | 0.002 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 149.63 | 25.57 | 147.44 | 24.57 | 152.44 | 26.62 | 0.082 |
| Uric acid (mg/dl) | 4.52 | 1.19 | 4.66 | 1.32 | 4.35 | 0.97 | 0.021 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 85.18 | 7.55 | 85.91 | 6.68 | 84.25 | 8.46 | 0.050 |
| Insuli | 15.35 | 11.33 | 15.12 | 10.24 | 15.65 | 12.62 | 0.680 |
| HOMA-index | 3.29 | 2.54 | 3.26 | 2.34 | 3.31 | 2.78 | 0.864 |
| PulseWaveVelocity (m/sec) | 4.80 | 0.97 | 4.76 | 0.93 | 4.84 | 1.02 | 0.490 |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 76.95 | 12.17 | 74.27 | 11.72 | 80.38 | 11.90 | <0.001 |
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WtHr, waist circumference height ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. HOMA, homeostatic model assessment index.
Univariable and multivariable linear regression model on pulse wave velocity (m/s) – (Model A adjusted by SBP and Model B adjusted by DBP).
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Intercept | – | – | – | – | 2.836 | ( | 1.309 | ; | 4.362 | ) | <0.001 | 2.764 | ( | 1.251 | ; | 4.277 | ) | <0.001 | |||
| Age (years) | 0.085 | ( | 0.049 | ; | 0.122 | ) |
| 0.067 | ( | 0.007 | ; | 0.128 | ) |
| 0.078 | ( | 0.019 | ; | 0.136 | ) |
|
| Gender (male) | −0.075 | ( | −0.289 | ; | 0.139 | ) | 0.490 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| Puberty (Yes) | 0.333 | ( | 0.123 | ; | 0.543 | ) |
| −0.033 | ( | −0.328 | ; | 0.262 | ) | 0.826 | −0.019 | ( | −0.314 | ; | 0.276 | ) | 0.898 |
| Weight (kg) | 0.012 | ( | 0.007 | ; | 0.018 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| Height (m) | 1.480 | ( | 0.845 | ; | 2.116 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.042 | ( | 0.021 | ; | 0.062 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| BMI | 0.093 | ( | −0.018 | ; | 0.203 | ) | 0.099 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| Weight class | 0.071 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
| Normal Weight | ref. | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
| Overweight | 0.356 | ( | 0.051 | ; | 0.660 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
| Obese | 0.236 | ( | −0.044 | ; | 0.516 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
| WC (cm) | 0.018 | ( | 0.010 | ; | 0.026 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| WtHr (%) | 0.016 | ( | 0.001 | ; | 0.031 | ) |
| 0.010 | ( | −0.006 | ; | 0.027 | ) | 0.227 | 0.009 | ( | −0.008 | ; | 0.026 | ) | 0.307 |
| WtHr > 50% | 0.166 | ( | −0.071 | ; | 0.403 | ) | 0.168 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| SBP office (mmHg) | 0.022 | ( | 0.015 | ; | 0.028 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| DBP office (mmHg) | 0.032 | ( | 0.022 | ; | 0.042 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| SBP ( | 0.272 | ( | 0.175 | ; | 0.368 | ) |
| 0.156 | ( | 0.046 | ; | 0.267 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | |||
| DBP ( | 0.324 | ( | 0.190 | ; | 0.458 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | 0.209 | ( | 0.063 | ; | 0.355 | ) |
| |||
| Blood Pressure Category |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
| Normotensive | ref. | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||
| High Normal | 0.377 | ( | 0.023 | ; | 0.073 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
| Hypertensive | 0.579 | ( | 0.306 | ; | 0.853 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.414 | ( | 0.643 | ; | 2.184 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| eGFR (ml/min) | −0.005 | ( | 0.009 | ; | −0.001 | ) |
| −0.004 | ( | −0.009 | ; | 0.001 | ) | 0.086 | −0.004 | ( | −0.008 | ; | 0.001 | ) | 0.116 |
| Uric acid (mg/dl) | 0.138 | ( | 0.050 | ; | 0.226 | ) |
| −0.020 | ( | −0.126 | ; | 0.086 | ) | 0.716 | −0.018 | ( | −0.124 | ; | 0.088 | ) | 0.742 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 0.014 | ( | 0.001 | ; | 0.028 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| Insuli | 0.019 | ( | 0.010 | ; | 0.028 | ) |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| HOMA–index | 0.085 | ( | 0.044 | ; | 0.126 | ) |
| 0.041 | ( | −0.007 | ; | 0.088 | ) | 0.095 | 0.043 | ( | −0.005 | ; | 0.091 | ) | 0.076 |
| Heart rate | 0.010 | ( | 0.001 | ; | 0.018 | ) |
| 0.015 | ( | 0.006 | ; | 0.024 | ) |
| 0.015 | ( | 0.006 | ; | 0.024 | ) |
|
b, coefficient; CI, confidence interval; ref., reference; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WtHr, waist circumference height ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. HOMA, homeostatic model assessment index. Statistically significant p-values are in bold.
Figure 1Mediation analysis model with PWV as outcome, including HOMA-index and SUA as mediators (A), with SBP (B) and DBP (C) z-scores as outcome, including HOMA-index and SUA as mediators and with PWV as outcome including SUA and eGFR as mediators (D). SUA, serum uric acid; HOMA-index, homeostatic model assessment index; PWV, pulse wave velocity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SBP-z, systolic blood pressure z-score; DBP-z, diastolic blood pressure z-score. Continuous line, statistically significant; dotted line, not statistically significant; green line, direct effect; blue line, indirect effect.
Figure 2Mediation analysis model with PWV as outcome, including HOMA-index, SUA, SBP (A) and DBP (B) z-scores as mediators. SUA, serum uric acid; HOMA-index, homeostatic model assessment index; PWV, pulse wave velocity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SBP-z, systolic blood pressure z-score; DBP-z, diastolic blood pressure z-score. Continuous line, statistically significant; dotted line, not statistically significant; green line, direct effect; blue line, partial indirect effect (one mediator); red line, partial indirect effect (two mediators). Overall indirect effect (with SBP z) = 0,100 p < 0,001. Overall indirect effect (with DBP z) = 0,084 p < 0,001.