Literature DB >> 31132954

Noninvasive Estimation of Aortic Stiffness Through Different Approaches.

Paolo Salvi1, Filippo Scalise2, Matteo Rovina3, Francesco Moretti4, Lucia Salvi5, Andrea Grillo1,6, Lan Gao7, Corrado Baldi3, Andrea Faini1, Giulia Furlanis3, Antonio Sorropago6, Sandrine C Millasseau8, Giovanni Sorropago2, Renzo Carretta3, Alberto P Avolio9, Gianfranco Parati1,6.   

Abstract

Aortic pulse wave velocity is a worldwide accepted index to evaluate aortic stiffness and can be assessed noninvasively by several methods. This study sought to determine if commonly used noninvasive devices can all accurately estimate aortic pulse wave velocity. Pulse wave velocity was estimated in 102 patients (aged 65±13 years) undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography with 7 noninvasive devices and compared with invasive aortic pulse wave velocity. Devices evaluating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Complior Analyse, PulsePen ET, PulsePen ETT, and SphygmoCor) showed a strong agreement between each other ( r>0.83) and with invasive aortic pulse wave velocity. The mean difference ±SD with the invasive pulse wave velocity was -0.73±2.83 m/s ( r=0.64) for Complior-Analyse: 0.20±2.54 m/s ( r=0.71) for PulsePen-ETT: -0.04±2.33 m/s ( r=0.78) for PulsePen ET; and -0.61±2.57 m/s ( r=0.70) for SphygmoCor. The finger-toe pulse wave velocity, evaluated by pOpmètre, showed only a weak relationship with invasive aortic recording (mean difference ±SD =-0.44±4.44 m/s; r=0.41), and with noninvasive carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements ( r<0.33). Pulse wave velocity estimated through a proprietary algorithm by BPLab (v.5.03 and v.6.02) and Mobil-O-Graph showed a weaker agreement with invasive pulse wave velocity compared with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (mean difference ±SD =-0.71±3.55 m/s, r=0.23; 1.04±2.27 m/s, r=0.77; and -1.01±2.54 m/s, r=0.71, respectively), revealing a negative proportional bias at Bland-Altman plot. Aortic pulse wave velocity values provided by BPLab and Mobil-O-Graph were entirely dependent on age-squared and peripheral systolic blood pressure (cumulative r2=0.98 and 0.99, respectively). Thus, among the methods evaluated, only those assessing carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Complior Analyse, PulsePen ETT, PulsePen ET, and SphygmoCor) appear to be reliable approaches for estimation of aortic stiffness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arteriosclerosis; cardiac catheterization; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; hemodynamics; pulse wave velocity; vascular stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31132954     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  28 in total

Review 1.  How to Measure Arterial Stiffness in Humans.

Authors:  Patrick Segers; Ernst R Rietzschel; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 2.  Large-Artery Stiffness in Health and Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers; Timothy Hughes; Raymond Townsend
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Ambulatory monitoring of central arterial pressure, wave reflections, and arterial stiffness in patients at cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Ayana Arystan; Bela Benczur
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 4.  Acute and Long-Term Consequences of COVID-19 on Arterial Stiffness-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ioana Mădălina Zota; Cristian Stătescu; Radu Andy Sascău; Mihai Roca; Larisa Anghel; Alexandra Maștaleru; Maria Magdalena Leon-Constantin; Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc; Sebastian Romica Cozma; Lucia Corina Dima-Cozma; Irina Mihaela Esanu; Florin Mitu
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25

5.  Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: a population-based study.

Authors:  Rosaria Del Giorno; Chiara Troiani; Sofia Gabutti; Kevyn Stefanelli; Luca Gabutti
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.709

6.  Physiological Age- and Sex-Related Profiles for Local (Aortic) and Regional (Carotid-Femoral, Carotid-Radial) Pulse Wave Velocity and Center-to-Periphery Stiffness Gradient, with and without Blood Pressure Adjustments: Reference Intervals and Agreement between Methods in Healthy Subjects (3-84 Years).

Authors:  Daniel Bia; Yanina Zócalo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 7.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring over 24 h: A Latin American Society of Hypertension position paper-accessibility, clinical use and cost effectiveness of ABPM in Latin America in year 2020.

Authors:  Ramiro A Sánchez; José Boggia; Ernesto Peñaherrera; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Eduardo Barbosa; Raúl Villar; Leonardo Cobos; Rafael Hernández Hernández; Jesús Lopez; José Andrés Octavio; José Z Parra Carrillo; Agustín J Ramírez; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Blood Pressure and Body Weight Have Different Effects on Pulse Wave Velocity and Cardiac Mass in Children.

Authors:  Simonetta Genovesi; Paolo Salvi; Elisa Nava; Elena Tassistro; Marco Giussani; Ilaria Desimone; Antonina Orlando; Mariagrazia Battaglino; Giulia Lieti; Massimo Montemerlo; Laura Antolini; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of ambulatory central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic CKD.

Authors:  Charalampos Loutradis; Maria Schoina; Theodoros Dimitroulas; Michael Doumas; Alexandros Garyfallos; Asterios Karagiannis; Aikaterini Papagianni; Pantelis Sarafidis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Associations between remnant lipoprotein cholesterol and central systolic blood pressure in a Chinese community-based population: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Yan Zhang; Kaiyin Li; Fangfang Fan; Bo Zheng; Jia Jia; Bo Liu; Jiahui Liu; Chuyun Chen; Yong Huo
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.