| Literature DB >> 36035669 |
Shaodong Fu1,2, Yan Deng1,2, Kai Zou3, Shuangfei Zhang1,2, Xueduan Liu1,2, Yili Liang1,2.
Abstract
Altitude affects plant growth and metabolism, but the effect of altitude on plant endophytic microorganisms is still unclear. In this study, we selected 16 Ginkgo biloba trees to study the response of leaves' endophytes to flavonoids and altitude (from 530 m to 1,310 m). HPLC results showed that flavonoids in Ginkgo biloba leaves increased by more than 150% with attitude rising from 530 m to 1,310 m, which revealed a positive correlation with altitude. Ginkgo biloba might regulate the increased flavonoids in leaves to resist the increasing light intensity. 16S rDNA sequencing results showed that the endophytic bacterial communities of Ginkgo biloba at different altitudes significantly differed. Ginkgo leaf endophytes' alpha diversity decreased with increasing flavonoids content and altitude. The increased flavonoids might increase the environmental pressure on endophytes and affect the endophytic community in Ginkgo biloba leaves. The bacterial network in Ginkgo biloba leaves became more complex with increasing altitude, which might be one of the strategies of leaf endophytes to cope with increasing flavonoids. Metagenomes results predicted with PICRUSt showed that the abundance of flavonoid biosynthesis and photosynthesis genes were significantly decreased with the increase of flavonoid contents. High flavonoid content in leaves appeared to inhibit microbial flavonoid synthesis. Our findings indicate that altitude can modulate microbial community structure through regulating plant metabolites, which is important to uncovering the interaction of microbes, host and the environment.Entities:
Keywords: Ginkgo biloba; endophyte community; flavonoids; function genes; network
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035669 PMCID: PMC9410704 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.982771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Altitude and other information of sampling trees.
| Sample | DBH(m) | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude(m) |
| S1_1 | 3.00 | N 29°57′22″ | E 110°48’40″ | 530 |
| S1_2 | 4.00 | N 29°57′22″ | E 110°48′40″ | 530 |
| S1_3 | 3.24 | N 29°51′59″ | E 110°44′59″ | 560 |
| S1_4 | 2.18 | N 29°51′59″ | E 110°44′59″ | 560 |
| S2_1 | 2.00 | N 29°56′55″ | E 110°39′16″ | 800 |
| S2_2 | 2.15 | N 29°54′12″ | E 110°44′33″ | 820 |
| S2_3 | 3.10 | N 29°54′12″ | E 110°44′33″ | 820 |
| S2_4 | 3.18 | N 29°53′7″ | E 110°42′28″ | 840 |
| S3_1 | 2.26 | N 29°56′7″ | E 110°38′28″ | 1,000 |
| S3_2 | 1.92 | N 29°55′50″ | E 110°37′6″ | 1,020 |
| S3_3 | 2.59 | N 29°52′7″ | E 110°37′28″ | 1,040 |
| S3_4 | 4.12 | N 26°55′13″ | E 110°36′16″ | 1,040 |
| S4_1 | 2.40 | N 30°5′47″ | E 110°48′50″ | 1,260 |
| S4_2 | 3.00 | N 30°6′46″ | E 110°46′29″ | 1,300 |
| S4_3 | 3.74 | N 30°6′7″ | E 110°49′2″ | 1,300 |
| S4_4 | 2.65 | N 30°9′23″ | E 110°44′19″ | 1,310 |
FIGURE 1The concentration of three flavonols and total flavonoids in Ginkgo leaves at different altitudes. The significant difference among the groups is represented by different letters (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2(A) Chao 1 index calculated with the OTU table. (B) Observed_otus in different sites. (C) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on bray_curtis distance. (D) Principal Components Analysis (PCA).
FIGURE 3(A) Endophyte composition in all samples at the phylum level. (B) Endophyte community composition at the family level.
FIGURE 4(A) Redundancy analysis (RDA) and (B) variance partitioning analysis (VPA) of the relationships between endophytic bacterial community and environmental variables in Ginkgo biloba leaves.
FIGURE 5Heatmap (A) The correlation test between families and factors. (B) The correlation test between genera and factors. (***) p < 0.001, (**) p < 0.01 and (*) p < 0.05.
FIGURE 6(A) Relative abundance of predicted function genes in different levels I samples. (B) Changes in the relative abundance of predicted genes in the flavonoid synthesis and photosynthesis pathways in all samples. Samples with different letters indicated significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 7Network of different sites (A) Network of bacterial community at S1. (B) Network of S2. (C) Network of S3. (D) Network of S4. (E) Details of networks in different sites.