Literature DB >> 36035544

Demystifying the Risk Assessment Process for Laboratory-Based Experiments Utilizing Invasive Genetic Elements: It Is More Than Gene Drive.

Zach N Adelman1.   

Abstract

Advances in recombinant DNA approaches have resulted in the development of transgene architectures that severely bias their own inheritance, a process commonly referred to as "gene drive." The rapid pace of development, combined with the complexity of many gene drive approaches, threatens to overwhelm those responsible for ensuring its safe use in the laboratory, as even identifying that a specific transgene is capable of gene drive may not be intuitive. Although currently gene drive experiments have been limited to just a few species (mosquitoes, flies, mice, and yeast), the range of organisms used in gene drive research is expected to increase substantially in the coming years. Here the defining features of different gene drive approaches are discussed. Although this will start with a focus on identifying when gene drive could or could not occur, the emphasis will also be on establishing risk profiles based on anticipated level of invasiveness and persistence of transgenes in the surrounding environment. Attention is also called to the fact that transgenes can be considered invasive without being considered gene drive (and vice versa). This further supports the notion that adequate risk assessment requires information regarding the specific circumstances a given transgene or set of transgenes is capable of invading a corresponding population. Finally, challenges in the review and evaluation of work involving gene drive organisms are discussed. Copyright 2021, ABSA International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosafety; containment; gene drive; invasive genetic element; risk assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 36035544      PMCID: PMC9134331          DOI: 10.1089/apb.20.0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biosaf        ISSN: 1535-6760


  18 in total

1.  Rodent gene drives for conservation: opportunities and data needs.

Authors:  John Godwin; Megan Serr; S Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling; Dimitri V Blondel; Peter R Brown; Karl Campbell; Jason Delborne; Alun L Lloyd; Kevin P Oh; Thomas A A Prowse; Royden Saah; Paul Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Revisit NIH biosafety guidelines.

Authors:  Kenneth A Oye; Maureen O'Leary; Margaret F Riley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Progress towards engineering gene drives for population control.

Authors:  Robyn R Raban; John M Marshall; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Public health concerns over gene-drive mosquitoes: will future use of gene-drive snails for schistosomiasis control gain increased level of community acceptance?

Authors:  Damilare O Famakinde
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A synthetic gene drive system for local, reversible modification and suppression of insect populations.

Authors:  Omar S Akbari; Kelly D Matzen; John M Marshall; Haixia Huang; Catherine M Ward; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Recommendations for Laboratory Containment and Management of Gene Drive Systems in Arthropods.

Authors:  Mark Q Benedict; Austin Burt; Margareth L Capurro; Paul De Barro; Alfred M Handler; Keith R Hayes; John M Marshall; Walter J Tabachnick; Zach N Adelman
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 7.  Developing standard operating procedures for gene drive research in disease vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  Zach N Adelman; David Pledger; Kevin M Myles
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Arthropod Containment Guidelines, Version 3.2.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.133

9.  BIOSAFETY. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory.

Authors:  Omar S Akbari; Hugo J Bellen; Ethan Bier; Simon L Bullock; Austin Burt; George M Church; Kevin R Cook; Peter Duchek; Owain R Edwards; Kevin M Esvelt; Valentino M Gantz; Kent G Golic; Scott J Gratz; Melissa M Harrison; Keith R Hayes; Anthony A James; Thomas C Kaufman; Juergen Knoblich; Harmit S Malik; Kathy A Matthews; Kate M O'Connor-Giles; Annette L Parks; Norbert Perrimon; Fillip Port; Steven Russell; Ryu Ueda; Jill Wildonger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A synthetic maternal-effect selfish genetic element drives population replacement in Drosophila.

Authors:  Chun-Hong Chen; Haixia Huang; Catherine M Ward; Jessica T Su; Lorian V Schaeffer; Ming Guo; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.