Literature DB >> 36035529

An Assessment of Essential Anatomy Course Content in an Entry-Level Doctor of Physical Therapy Program.

Michael A Pascoe1, Mary Jane Rapport1.   

Abstract

Anatomical knowledge is the foundation of the educational curricula in most healthcare programs. The varying scopes of practice between healthcare professions require anatomy educators to determine what content is essential to cover in a finite time with learners. When possible, the anatomy educator bases this decision on clinical experiences; this is a more significant challenge for the non-clinician educator teaching in a health profession curriculum. Although studies have determined essential anatomy content in many healthcare professions, no study has been undertaken in physical therapist education. This study was designed to determine what anatomical concepts are considered essential in physical therapist education in one doctor of physical therapy program. Faculty (n = 28), recent graduates (n = 134), and clinical instructors (n = 247) of a doctor of physical therapy program were invited to respond to a survey focused on rating the essential nature of 46 learning objectives. Consensus for learning objectives was determined using Lawshe's content validity method. One hundred forty-seven respondents completed the survey (36% response rate). Respondents represented a diversity in years of experience, highest physical therapist degree earned, specialty training, and setting of physical therapist practice. Of the 46 learning objectives presented, 10 were most frequently rated essential, 20 as useful but not essential, and 16 as not necessary. These results offer guidance for anatomy instructors at other institutions to make an informed decision on what anatomical content to focus on in their anatomy courses in order to increase time dedicated toward mastery of essential core anatomical knowledge for physical therapist practice. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01574-1.
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to International Association of Medical Science Educators 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Content consensus; Content validity; Entry-level practice; Gross anatomy; Stakeholder survey

Year:  2022        PMID: 36035529      PMCID: PMC9411453          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-022-01574-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  26 in total

Review 1.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

Authors:  F Hasson; S Keeney; H McKenna
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  The Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine.

Authors:  C F Smith; G M Finn; J Stewart; M A Atkinson; D C Davies; R Dyball; J Morris; C Ockleford; I Parkin; S Standring; S Whiten; J Wilton; S McHanwell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research.

Authors:  Jane Waggoner; Jan D Carline; Steven J Durning
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The Delphi technique in health sciences education research.

Authors:  Marietjie R de Villiers; Pierre J T de Villiers; Athol P Kent
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10.

Authors:  Iain Colthart; Gellisse Bagnall; Alison Evans; Helen Allbutt; Alex Haig; Jan Illing; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow.

Authors:  Richard L Drake; Jennifer M McBride; Nirusha Lachman; Wojciech Pawlina
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Essential anatomy of the head and neck: the complete Delphi Panel list.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Phillip B Paulk
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Physical Therapist Student Loan Debt.

Authors:  Diane U Jette
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2016-11

Review 9.  The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing?

Authors:  H P McKenna
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  The Anatomical Society's core anatomy syllabus for undergraduate nursing.

Authors:  S A Connolly; T H Gillingwater; C Chandler; A W Grant; J Greig; M Meskell; M T Ross; C F Smith; A F Wood; G M Finn
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.