| Literature DB >> 36035425 |
David L Boyle1, Edward B Prideaux2, Joshua Hillman1, Wei Wang2, Gary S Firestein1.
Abstract
Objective: To improve the fidelity of the cellular transcriptome of disaggregated synovial tissue for applications such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) by modifying the disaggregation technique.Entities:
Keywords: disaggregation; functional genomics; rheumatoid arthritis; synovia; transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035425 PMCID: PMC9400013 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.919748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Cell yield and viability for RA and OA after disaggregations.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| RA | 4941 ± 4232 | 78 ± 6 | 7 | 5698 ± 5823 | 79 ± 6 | 7 | 6341 ± 5170 | 93 ± 3.6 | 7 |
| OA | 803 ± 697 | 75 ± 13 | 8 | 1290 ± 316 | 79 ± 3 | 10 | 2060 ± 1750 | 90 ± 13 | 18 |
Disaggregation of RA tissue yielded more cells than OA tissue but was not significantly different among techniques. Sub A improved viability of disaggregated cells compared to Lib (OA p = 0.013; RA p = 0.023).
Figure 1Expression of select 11 transcripts in intact synovia. Selected transcripts were measured by qPCR in replicate pools of intact OA (n = 10) and RA (n = 5) synovial tissues from 3 experiments and reported as Relative Expression Units (REU) as previously described (5). The heterogeneity of expression among tissues, markers and disease are notable. (A) OA and RA intact tissue, demonstrating in situ expression pattern. (B) Lib disaggregated OA and RA cells, (C) Lib/Flavo disaggregated OA and RA cells. (D) Subtilison A disaggregated synovial tissue cells.
Figure 2Effect of disaggregation on select 11 transcripts. Expression of candidate genes in disaggregated tissue is normalized to expression in parent (intact) tissue. (A) Lib, (B) Lib+Flavo, and (C) SubA. Line at 1.0 indicates identical disaggregated and intact expression, above 1.0 indicates induction or enrichment and below 1.0 indicates lower gene expression after disaggregation. Normalization illustrates the differential effects of disaggregation on individual transcripts. Note scale differential effects of disaggregation.
Figure 3RNAseq fold change comparison of gene expression using different disaggregation protocols. (A–D) Relative changes in each gene for the 3 protocols compared to intact are shown for the top 50% of expressed genes. Genes that are represented below the line are induced more in Lib compared with Lib+Flavo or SubA. (E,F) Distribution of gene expression changes in each protocol for RA and OA. Histograms are colored by disaggregation protocol. A log2 scale is used on the x-axis, so “zero” represents identical expression compared with intact. Points to the right represent induced genes.
Figure 4Expression ratios of induced genes under treatment protocols. Relative expression of all genes with >1.5-fold induction in each protocol relative to intact in OA (A) and RA (B). Y-axis indicates log2(Protocol/Intact) value for each selected gene. “Zero” on the y-axis indicates no change in expression between protocol and intact. Genes are ordered by fold induction observed in Lib compared to Intact. Lines colors represent the disaggregation protocols. P-values calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank method. (C) Inducement levels of all genes with >1.5-fold induction in each protocol relative to intact, displaying both OA (colored line) and RA (black line) for each protocol. Genes are ordered by fold induction observed in Lib compared to intact. P-values calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank method. A greater difference in the RA and OA lines in each protocol indicates a greater difference in induction levels by that protocol for OA and RA.
Differential pathways lost or enriched by each disaggregation protocol relative to intact tissue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-13 signaling | 6.4E−08 | 2.5E−06 | ||
| Assembly of collagen fibrils and other multimeric structures | 9.8E−05 | 6.0E−03 | ||
| Interleukin-10 signaling | 3.4E−08 | 2.7E−05 | 1.4E−03 | |
| Signaling by Interleukins | 1.1E−06 | 3.9E−04 | 2.4E−03 | |
| Signaling by NOTCH3 | 3.5E−03 | 1.5E−03 | 9.7E−03 | |
| Extracellular matrix organization | 6.4E−08 | 5.6E−10 | 3.8E−06 | 3.9E−06 |
| Chemokine receptors bind chemokines | 1.5E−06 | 2.7E−05 | 1.0E−04 | 3.3E−06 |
| Immunoregulatory interactions between a Lymphoid and a non-Lymphoid cell | 6.4E−08 | 1.2E−04 | 2.4E−05 | 5.5E−08 |
| Integrin cell surface interactions | 4.8E−07 | 1.3E−04 | 4.3E−05 | 3.9E−05 |
| GPCR ligand binding | 1.2E−03 | 4.5E−04 | 3.9E−04 | 1.3E−04 |
| Class A/1 (Rhodopsin-like receptors) | 5.5E−05 | 7.9E−04 | 3.0E−05 | 1.7E−05 |
| Peptide ligand-binding receptors | 1.3E−04 | 7.2E−03 | 8.0E−06 | 3.1E−05 |
| G alpha (i) signaling events | 1.4E−03 | 4.5E−03 | 3.0E−03 | 1.7E−04 |
| Binding and Uptake of Ligands by Scavenger Receptors | 2.8E−05 | |||
| Collagen degradation | 2.8E−05 | |||
| Degradation of the extracellular matrix | 5.7E−05 | |||
| Collagen chain trimerization | 2.0E−03 | |||
| RAF-independent MAPK1/3 activation | 2.1E−03 | |||
| Collagen formation | 3.0E−03 | |||
| NOTCH3 Intracellular Domain Regulates Transcription | 3.1E−03 | |||
| Interleukin-6 signaling | 8.4E−03 | |||
| Scavenging of heme from plasma | 9.1E−03 | 1.4E−03 | ||
| Elastic fiber formation | 2.4E−07 | |||
| Molecules associated with elastic fibers | 3.1E−04 | |||
| Signaling by NOTCH1 | 4.5E−03 | |||
| Erythrocytes take up carbon dioxide and release oxygen | 3.0E−03 | |||
| O2/CO2 exchange in erythrocytes | 3.0E−03 | |||
| Syndecan interactions | 4.7E−03 | |||
| Triglyceride metabolism | 8.6E−03 |