| Literature DB >> 36035325 |
Syahida Mohtar1, Nazean Jomhari1, Mumtaz Begum Mustafa1, Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff2.
Abstract
Over the past several years, mobile learning concepts have changed the way people perceived on mobile devices and technology in the learning environment. In earlier days, mobile devices were used mainly for communication purposes. Later, with many new advanced features of mobile devices, they have opened the opportunity for individuals to use them as mediated technology in learning. The traditional way of teaching and learning has shifted into a new learning dimension, where an individual can execute learning and teaching everywhere and anytime. Mobile learning has encouraged lifelong learning, in which everyone can have the opportunity to use mobile learning applications to gain knowledge. However, many of the previous studies on mobile learning have focused on the young and older adults, and less intention on middle-aged adults. In this research, it is targeted for the middle-aged adults which are described as those who are between the ages of 40 to 60. Middle-aged adults typically lead very active lives while at the same time are also very engaged in self-development programs aimed at enhancing their spiritual, emotional, and physical well-being. In this paper, we investigate the methodology used by researchers based on the research context namely, acceptance, adoption, effectiveness, impact, intention of use, readiness, and usability of mobile learning. The research context was coded to the identified methodologies found in the literature. This will help one to understand how mobile learning can be effectively implemented for middle-aged adults in future work. A systematic review was performed using EBSCO Discovery Service, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Scopus, IEEE and ACM databases to identify articles related to mobile learning adoption. A total of 65 journal articles were selected from the years 2016 to 2021 based on Kitchenham systematic review methodology. The result shows there is a need to strengthen research in the field of mobile learning with middle-aged adults.Entities:
Keywords: Methodology; Middle-aged adults; Mobile application; Self-directed learning
Year: 2022 PMID: 36035325 PMCID: PMC9391209 DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-13698-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multimed Tools Appl ISSN: 1380-7501 Impact factor: 2.577
Mobile Learning Theories Naismith et al. (2004)
| Theory | Description |
|---|---|
| Behaviorist | Activities that promote learning as a change in observable actions. |
| Constructivist | Activities in which learners actively construct new ideas or concepts based on both their previous and current knowledge. |
| Situated | Activities that promote learning within an authentic context and culture. |
| Collaborative | Activities that promote learning through social interaction. |
| Informal and lifelong | Activities that support learning outside a dedicated learning environment and formal curriculum. |
| Learning and teaching support | Activities that assist in the coordination of learners and resources for learning activities. |
The 6 principles of Adult Learning
| Principles | Description |
|---|---|
| The learner’s need to know | Adults need to know why they need to learn something. |
| Self-directedness | Adults need to self-direct and take responsibility for their learning. |
| The role of experience | Adult learners have a wide variety of experiences and backgrounds. |
| Intrinsic motivation | Adults are inspired to learn when what they learn can help them deal better with real-life circumstances. |
| Orientation to learning. | Adults are task-oriented and learn things best in the context of using them. |
| Readiness to learn. | Adults become ready to learn things they need to know and do in order to cope effectively with real-life situations. |
Fig. 1Phases of conducting this systematic review
Keywords used in the article search
| Term 1 | AND | Term 2 | AND | Term 3 | AND | Term 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-computer interaction OR HCI | Mobile learning OR M-learning OR Mlearning OR Applications OR Mobile devices OR Mobile Apps | Middle-aged OR Middle age OR Mid life OR Long-life Adults OR Older adults OR Adult | Adoption OR Acceptance OR Usability OR Use |
Fig. 2Selecting the primary papers
Articles based on research area
| Area | References |
|---|---|
| Education | [ |
| Healthcare | [ |
| Social & Communication | [ |
| Design and Development (usability) | [ |
| Transaction Service | [ |
Summarization of selected studies from the year 2016 to 2021
| Year | Studies |
|---|---|
| 2016 | de Lara, et al. [ |
| 2017 | Christensen and Knezek [ |
| 2018 | Gan and Balakrishnan [ |
| 2019 | Bere and Rambe [ |
| 2020 | Li and Luximon [ |
| 2021 | Shukla [ |
Fig. 3Distribution of reviewed studies by year
Locations of the studies reviewed
| Country | Num. of Articles | Reference | Country | Num. of Articles | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | [ | Norway | 1 | [ |
| Bangladesh | 1 | [ | Oman | 1 | [ |
| Belgium | 1 | [ | Pakistan | 1 | [ |
| Brazil | 1 | [ | Poland | 2 | [ |
| Brunei | 1 | [ | Romania | 2 | [ |
| China | 11 | [ | Saudi Arabia | 2 | [ |
| Crotia | 1 | [ | Singapore | 2 | [ |
| Czech Republic | 1 | [ | South Africa | 1 | [ |
| Germany | 1 | [ | Spain | 1 | [ |
| Greece | 1 | [ | Thailand | 2 | [ |
| India | 2 | [ | Turkey | 1 | [ |
| Italy | 2 | [ | Uganda | 1 | [ |
| Jordan | 1 | [ | United States | 9 | [ |
| Malaysia | 2 | [ | Uruguay | 1 | [ |
| Mexico | 1 | [ | United Kingdom | 2 | [ |
| Netherlands | 1 | [ | Europe | 1 | [ |
Articles based on Participant’s Category
| Participant’s Category | References |
|---|---|
| Older Adult | [ |
| Middle-Aged Adult | [ |
| Young Adult | [ |
Fig. 4Number of studies based on participants’ age category
Research involving middle-aged adults
| Reference | Year | Research Title | Middle-age range | Research Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 2020 | Benefits of the Use of Mobile Applications for Learning a Foreign Language by Elderly Population. | 50–85 years old. | Education-Language Learning |
| [ | 2019 | Mobile language learning applications for Arabic speaking migrants–a usability perspective. | 5–50 years old. | Education-Language Learning |
| [ | 2017 | The design and implementation of a context-aware mobile Hadith learning system. | 19–49 years old. | Education-Spiritual |
| [ | 2019 | Middle-aged adults’ attitudes toward health app usage: a comparison with the cognitive-affective-conative model. | 45–65 years old. | Healthcare-Well Being |
| [ | 2020 | Exploring seniors’ continuance intention to use mobile social network sites in China: a cognitive-affective-conative model. | 50–70 years old. | Healthcare-Well Being |
| [ | 2020 | The development of a mobile user interface ability evaluation system for the elderly. | 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 and > 80 years old. | Usability |
| [ | 2020 | Chakuri-Bazaar: A Mobile Application for Illiterate and Semi-Literate People for Searching Employment. | 18–55 years old. | User-Requirement |
| [ | 2016 | A study on the acceptance of website interaction aids by older adults. | >39, 40 < 59, and > 60 years old. | Transaction Service |
| [ | 2017 | A model of mobile technologies acceptance for knowledge transfer by employees. | <20, 21–30,31–40, 41–50, and > 50 years old. | Education-Knowledge Transfer |
| [ | 2020 | Using Kahoot in law school: Differentiated instruction for working adults with diverse learning abilities. | Did not provide age range | Education - Law |
| [ | 2017 | Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences, and possibilities. | Did not provide age range | Education |
| [ | 2016 | Designing Serious Games for Safety Education: “Learn to Brace” versus Traditional Pictorials for Aircraft Passengers. | 19–55 years old | Education |
| [ | 2019 | The Effect of Cognitive Load on Gesture Acceptability of Older Adults in Mobile Application | 55 years old and above | Healthcare-Well Being |
| [ | 2019 | AppMoD: Helping Older Adults Manage Mobile Security with Online Social Help. | 18–40, 50+ years old | Design and Development |
| [ | 2018 | Evidence-based personal applications of medical computing models in risk factors of cardiovascular disease for the middle-aged and elderly. | 40–100 years old | Healthcare-Well Being |
| [ | 2019 | My Mom was Getting this Popup: Understanding Motivations and Processes in Helping Older Relatives with Mobile Security and Privacy. | <35, 35–54, >54 years old | Design and Development |
| [ | 2020 | An Automated Mobile Game-based Screening Tool for Patients with Alcohol Dependence. | 24–65 years old | Healthcare-Well Being |
| [ | 2021 | Determinants of Longitudinal Adherence in Smartphone-Based Self-Tracking for Chronic Health Conditions: Evidence from Axial. | 22–85 years old | Healthcare-Well Being |
| [ | 2021 | Its Changes so Often: Parental Non-/Use of Mobile Devices While Caring for Infants and Toddlers at Home. | 25–45 years old | Social & Communication |
| [ | 2021 | Parenting in a Pandemic: Juggling Multiple Roles and Managing Technology Use in Family Life During COVID-19 in the United States. | Did not provide age range | Social & Communication |
| [ | 2021 | Be Consistent, Work the Program, Be Present Every Day Exploring Technologies for Self-Tracking in Early Recovery | 21–60 years old | Healthcare-Well Being |
Fig. 5Number of articles in the research domain
Research context and methodology
| Research Context | Questionnaire (Q) | Interview (I) | Experiment (E) | Task Analysis (T) | Number of participants (n) | Duration in Week | ADULT GROUP Young (YA), Middle-Aged (MA), Older (OA) | Author | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q | I | E | T | ||||||||
| Acceptance (n = 6) | 328 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 228 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 313 | n/a | YA, MA, OA | [ | ||||||||
| 806 | 8 | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 24 | 24 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 371 | 20 | YA, MA | [ | ||||||||
| Adoption (n = 29) | 220 | 1 | YA | [ | |||||||
| 280 | 44 | 1 | OA | [ | |||||||
| 337 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 74 | 28 | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 320 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 355 | 42 | 8 | YA | [ | |||||||
| 422 | 14 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 23 | 13 | MA | [ | ||||||||
| 60 | 60 | 8 | YA | [ | |||||||
| 238 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 360 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 111 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 5 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 263 | 30 | 1 | YA | [ | |||||||
| 526 | 208 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 40 | 40 | 40 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | ||||||
| 226 | 10 | 2 | OA | [ | |||||||
| 50 | 50 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 78 | n/a | OA | [ | ||||||||
| 84 | n/a | MA, OA | [ | ||||||||
| 60 | n/a | OA | [ | ||||||||
| 24 | n/a | OA | [ | ||||||||
| 17 | n/a | OA, YA | [ | ||||||||
| 198 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | ||||||||
| 138 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 184 | n/a | YA, MA. OA | [ | ||||||||
| – | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 30 | n/a | MA | [ | ||||||||
| Effectiveness (n = 8) | 160 | 3 | YA | [ | |||||||
| 93 | 93 | 36 | OA | [ | |||||||
| 181 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 16 | 1 | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 58 | 58 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 48 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | ||||||||
| 10 | 10 | n/a | MA | [ | |||||||
| – | n/a | MA, OA | [ | ||||||||
| Impact (n = 2) | 40 | 40 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||
| 14 | 14 | 4 | OA | [ | |||||||
| Intention of Use (n = 5) | 359 | n/a | YA | [ | |||||||
| 374 | n/a | MA, OA | [ | ||||||||
| 1208 | n/a | YA | [ | ||||||||
| 17 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | ||||||||
| 17 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | ||||||||
| Usability (n = 6) | 22 | 22 | n/a | OA | [ | ||||||
| 135 | n/a | MA, OA | [ | ||||||||
| 33 | 33 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | |||||||
| 20 | n/a | YA, MA | [ | ||||||||
| 32 | 32 | n/a | OA | [ | |||||||
| 50 | OA | [ | |||||||||
| Readiness (n = 1) | 1430 | n/a | MA | [ | |||||||
Fig. 6Number of papers by research context
Fig. 7Number of articles by research methodology