| Literature DB >> 36034924 |
Xiyun Ren1, Shasha Wu2, Wei Xie1, Ying Liu1,2, Shucai Yang3.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption trajectories in Chinese adults and to evaluate their association with the risk of hyperuricemia (HU).Entities:
Keywords: China health and nutrition survey; branched chain amino acids; hyperuricemia; latent class trajectory model; mediation analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034924 PMCID: PMC9410769 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.916446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Trajectories of dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption (n = 6,810) in the Chinese adults from the CHNS by LCTM. BCAA, Branched chain amino acids; CHNS, China Health and Nutrition Survey; LCTM, Latent class trajectory modelling.
Baseline characteristics of study variables by different trajectories of dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption (N = 6,810).
| Trajectory | Low stable | High to low | Moderate stable | Moderate to high then decline | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age (years) | 40.7(10.4) | 34.4(14.8) | 43.6(13.5) | 41.9(8.0) | <0.001 |
| Men ( | 157(19.1) | 344(65.2) | 2505(48.3) | 206(73.8) | <0.001 |
| High school education or above ( | 110(13.4) | 126(23.9) | 1,035(19.9) | 59(21.1) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension ( | 127(15.5) | 77(14.6) | 968(18.7) | 48(17.2) | 0.026 |
| Current smoking ( | 152(18.5) | 207(39.2) | 1,620(31.2) | 134(48.0) | <0.001 |
| T2D ( | 117(14.2) | 72(13.6) | 977(18.8) | 60(21.5) | <0.001 |
| Total energy intake (kcal/day) | 1,976.4(594.9) | 2,692.2(884.8) | 2,295.5(627.6) | 2,764.9(991.3) | <0.001 |
| Total fat intake (g/day) | 53.7(28.2) | 78.4(41.4) | 68.9(35.7) | 77.2(38.7) | <0.001 |
| Total carbohydrate intake (g/day) | 319.5(118) | 411.7(150.5) | 353.4(122.3) | 424.5(173.5) | <0.001 |
| Total protein intake (g/day) | 55.6(33.3) | 88.6(63.2) | 68.5(24.2) | 94.3(81.2) | <0.001 |
| Total VC intake (mg/day) | 81.4(53.1) | 99.3(86.5) | 88.3(70.5) | 96.5(62.3) | 0.033 |
| Drinking (Drinks/week) | 2.1(7.9) | 5(10.6) | 5.1(13.6) | 8.5(15.7) | <0.001 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 4.6(1.5) | 5.5(1.8) | 5.2(1.8) | 5.6(1.7) | <0.001 |
| Urban index | 50.3(17.9) | 54.6(20.5) | 55.8(19.4) | 54.9(20.5) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.5(3.2) | 22.8(3.0) | 22.7(3.2) | 22.3(3.0) | <0.001 |
| PAL (Mets-h/week) | 63.1(98.5) | 85.5(116.7) | 68.4(100.5) | 95.1(120) | 0.060 |
Continuous data are expressed as mean (SD); where shown, data are n (%); SD, standard deviation.
Generalized linear models and Chi-square test were used to probe for differences in continuous variables and dichotomous variables.
PAL, Physical activity level; VC, Vitamin C; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; BMI, Body mass index.
Association between dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption trajectories and hyperuricemia (HU) by Cox regression models.
| Trajectory | Case/ | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||
| Low stable (T1) | 118/821 | 1(Ref.) | 1(Ref.) | 1(Ref.) |
| High to low (T2) | 97/528 | 1.43(1.09,1.87) | 1.39(1.06,1.83) | 1.35(1.03,1.79) |
| Moderate stable (T3) | 974/5,188 | 1.19(0.84,0.98) | 1.17(0.96,1.42) | 1.14(0.94,1.39) |
| Moderate to high then decline (T4) | 61/273 | 1.25(0.80,0.91) | 1.24(0.90,1.70) | 1.20(0.88,1.66) |
| 0.540 | 0.710 | 0.800 |
Model 1 Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, education, urban index, and PAL. Model 2 was further adjusted by total energy, fat, protein, carbohydrate, and VC intake.
Model 3 was further adjusted by BMI, hypertension, and T2D status.
PAL, Physical activity level; VC, Vitamin C; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; BMI, Body mass index.
Difference for hyperuricemia (HU)-related factors across dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption trajectories in 2009.
| Variables | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.43(0.38) | 1.41(0.54) | 1.45(0.49) | 1.42(0.34) | 0.232 |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 2.90(13.19) | 3.44(22.77) | 2.61(6.43) | 2.43(5.05) | 0.177 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.83(0.99) | 4.94(0.91) | 4.74(1.01) | 4.92(0.97) | < 0.001 |
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.64(1.39) | 1.75(1.50) | 1.73(1.31) | 1.68(1.50) | 0.007 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.32(1.41) | 5.47 (1.38) | 5.34(1.50) | 5.44(1.21) | 0.004 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.58(0.79) | 5.69(0.82) | 5.66(0.95) | 5.58(0.82) | 0.005 |
Generalized linear model was used to probe for the HU-related factors differences across different trajectories. Data are mean (SD).
HDL-C, High density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, Total cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol; hs-CRP, High sensitivity C reactive protein; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c FBG, Fasting blood glucose; SD, standard deviation.
FIGURE 2Mediation effects of TC, HbA1c, FBG, and TG on the association between dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption trajectories and risk of HU. Data were standardized regression coefficients with adjustment for covariates; *p < 0.05 for coefficients different from 0. TC, Total cholesterol; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; FBG, Fasting blood glucose; TG, Triglyceride; BCAA, Branched chain amino acids; HU, Hyperuricemia.
Association between dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) consumption and hyperuricemia (HU) by Logistic regression models in 2009 (N = 6,810).
| BCAA intake | Q1 ≤ 7,579.6 | Q2 (7,579.7-9,299.3) | Q3 (9,299.4-11,088.9) | Q4 (11,089.0-13,531.9) | Q5 ≥ 13,531.9 | |
| Case/N | 222/1,362 | 249/1,362 | 227/1,362 | 273/1,362 | 279/1,362 | |
| Model 1 | 1(Ref.) | 1.16(0.93,1.45) | 1.04(0.81,1.33) | 1.31(0.98,1.76) | 1.32(0.88,2.00) | 0.150 |
| Model 2 | 1(Ref.) | 1.17(0.96,1.44) | 1.04(0.84,1.28) | 1.33(1.09,1.39) | 1.37(1.12,1.68) | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1(Ref.) | 1.11(0.89,1.39) | 1.00(0.78,1.30) | 1.21(0.90,1.63) | 1.16(0.76,1.33) | 0.390 |
Model 1 Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, education, urban index, and PAL.
Model 2 was further adjusted by total energy, fat, protein, carbohydrate, and VC intake.
Model 3 was further adjusted by BMI, hypertension and T2D status.
PAL, Physical activity level; VC, Vitamin C; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; BMI, Body mass index.
Association between Mean dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) intake during follow-ups and hyperuricemia (HU) by Logistic regression model (N = 6,810).
| BCAA intake | Q1 ≤ 6,203.3 | Q2 (6,203.4-8,172.8) | Q3 (8,172.9-9,674.6) | Q4 (9,674.7-11,324.6) | Q5 ≥ 11,324.6 | |
| Case/ | 241/1,362 | 234/1,362 | 254/1,362 | 256/1,362 | 265/1,362 | |
| Model 1 | 1(Ref.) | 0.96(0.77,1.19) | 1.15(0.93,1.43) | 1.12(0.90,1.39) | 1.24(0.99,1.39) | 0.020 |
| Model 2 | 1(Ref.) | 0.98(0.80,1.21) | 1.16(0.95,1.42) | 1.18(0.96,1.44) | 1.30(1.06,1.60) | 0.002 |
| Model 3 | 1(Ref.) | 0.92(0.73,1.15) | 1.00(0.78,1.30) | 1.12(0.90,1.40) | 1.18(0.94,1.49) | 0.060 |
Model 1 Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, education, urban index, and PAL.
Model 2 was further adjusted by total energy, fat, protein, carbohydrate, and VC intake.
Model 3 was further adjusted by BMI, hypertension and T2D status.
PAL, Physical activity level; VC, Vitamin C; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; BMI, Body mass index.