Literature DB >> 36034505

Bilateral squamosal synostosis: unusual presentation of chromosome 1p12-1p13.3 deletion. Illustrative case.

Sarut Chaisrisawadisuk1,2, Nithiwat Vatanavicharn3, Verayuth Praphanphoj4, Peter J Anderson2,5, Mark H Moore2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Squamosal sutures are minor sutures of the human skull. Early isolated fusion of the sutures (squamosal synostosis) is rarely found. OBSERVATIONS: The authors report a case of a girl who presented with an abnormal head shape and bilateral squamosal synostosis. Genetic testing revealed a chromosome 1p12-1p13.3 deletion. She has been managed with conservative treatment of the synostosis. She has global developmental delay and multiple anomalies due to the chromosome abnormality. LESSONS: Isolated squamosal suture synostosis could be an uncommon feature of chromosome 1p12-1p13.3 deletion.
© 2021 The authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-CT = three-dimensional computed tomography; FGFR2 = fibroblast growth factor receptor 2; HMG = hydroxymethylglutaryl; chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 deletion; cranial sutures; craniosynostosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 36034505      PMCID: PMC9394163          DOI: 10.3171/CASE20102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons        ISSN: 2694-1902


The squamosal suture, one of the minor sutures of the human calvaria, sits between the temporal and parietal bones and extends from the pterion, curving around the temporal squama.[1] The suture is composed of a sphenosquamosal part (vertically oriented) and a temporosquamosal (horizontally oriented) part;[2] their physiological fusion has been reported to normally start in the late 30s. In craniofacial patients, isolated squamosal synostosis—a condition in which there is early fusion of the squamosal sutures—is found in rare instances.[4-6] There have been numerous reports of this synostosis being associated with some syndromes.[4-11] We previously reported a case of late presentation of isolated bilateral squamosal synostosis.[9] We now report a case of a 4-year-old girl who presented at 1 year of age with an abnormal head shape secondary to bilateral squamosal synostosis, and she also had chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 deletion. She has been managed with close monitoring. She continues her neurological development, albeit at a slow rate.

Illustrative Case

A 12-month-old girl presented with widening of the biparietal areas of the head (Fig. 1). She was born to nonconsanguineous parents with no familial history of congenital anomalies. An amniocentesis revealed chromosome 46,XX. She was born at 38 weeks of gestation. Her physical examination at 1 year of age showed a widening of both parietal bones and an open anterior fontanelle. The finding of her fundus examination was unremarkable. Dysmorphology examination demonstrated upward-slanting eyes with exotropia, long philtrum, thin upper lip, a single transverse palmar crease on the right hand, and postaxial polydactyly of the left foot. Echocardiography showed mild coarctation of the aorta and a hypoplastic aortic arch. She had global developmental delay and failure to thrive, with her height and weight under the third percentile. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) showed bilateral squamosal suture fusion with a 4.6 × 4.6–cm anterior fontanelle (Fig. 2). Ventriculomegaly was not observed.
FIG. 1.

Abnormal head shape, with bilateral bulging of the parietal regions.

FIG. 2.

3D-CT scans showing the fusion at both the parietosquamosal and parietomastoid sutures, with bulging of both parietal bones. Widening of the anterior fontanelle (4.6 × 4.6 cm) is present.

Abnormal head shape, with bilateral bulging of the parietal regions. 3D-CT scans showing the fusion at both the parietosquamosal and parietomastoid sutures, with bulging of both parietal bones. Widening of the anterior fontanelle (4.6 × 4.6 cm) is present. Mutation analysis of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene did not show any pathogenic variant. A blood karyotype study revealed 46,XX. We further conducted a chromosome microarray using an Affymetrix Cyto 750 K array, which revealed a 10.5-Mb deletion on chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 (chr1:109,461,754–119,984,872) (Fig. 3). The deleted chromosome region of our patient contained 148 genes (Table 1), of which 95 were listed in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database. Only 30 of these genes were known to be associated with Mendelian disease phenotypes (Table 2). The karyotype studies of the parents revealed balanced chromosome insertion 46,XY,ins(18;1)(p11.2;p13.1p13.3) in the father and normal chromosome in the mother. The recurrence risk of unbalanced chromosome aberrations was discussed with the family.
FIG. 3.

A: Whole-genome copy number variation and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) views demonstrated copy number lost on chromosome 1 (arrows). B: 10.5-Mb heterozygous deletion on chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 confirmed by copy number probes (upper 3 tracks) and SNP probes (bottom track).

TABLE 1.

List of 148 genes in the deleted chromosome region

SYPL2, ATXN7L2, CYB561D1, AMIGO1, GPR61, GNAI3, MIR197, GNAT2, AMPD2, GSTM4, GSTM2, GSTM1, GSTM5, GSTM3, EPS8L3, CSF1, AHCYL1, STRIP1, ALX3, LINCO1397, UBL4B, SLC6A17, KCNC4-AS1, KCNC4, LOC440600, RBM15, SLC16A4, LAMTOR5, LAMTOR5-AS1, PROK1, CYMP, LOC440602, KCNA10, KCNA2, KCNA3, CD53, LRIF1, DRAM2, CEPT1, DENND2D, CHI3L2, CHIAP2, CHIA, PIFO, PGCP1, OVGP1, WDRR77, ATP5F1, C1orf162, TMIGD3, ADORA3, LINC01160, RAP1A, FAM212B, FAM212B-AS1, LOC101928718, DDX20, KCND3, KCND3-IT1, KCND3-AS1, LOC643355, CTTNBP2NL, MIR4256, WNT2B, ST7L, CAPZA1, MOV10, RHOC, PPM1J, FAM19A3, LINC01356, SLC16A1, AKR7A2P1, SLC16A1-AS1, LOC100996251, LRIG2, LOC643441, MAGI3, PHTF1, RSBN1, AP4B1-AS1, PRPN22, BLC2L15, AP4B1, DCLRE1B, HIPK1-AS1, HIPK1, OLFML3, SYT6, TRIM33, BCAS2, DENND2C, AMPD1, NRAS, CSDE1, SIKE1, SYCP1, TSHB, TSPAN2, NGF, VANGL1, CASQ2, NHLH2, LOC101928995, LOC101928977, SLC22A15, MAB21L3, ATP1A1, ATP1A1-AS1, LOC101929023, CD58, MIR548AC, IGSF3, MIR320B1, C1orf137, CD2, PTGFRN, CD101, LOC101929099, TTF2, MIR942, TRIM45, VTCN1, LINC01525, MAN1A2, LOC100996263, FAM46C, GDAP2, WDR3, SPAG17, TBX15, LOC105378933, WARS2, WARS2-IT1, LOC101929147, HAO2, HAO2-IT1, HSD3B2, HSD3B1, HSD3B4P, LINC00622, ZNF697, PHGDH, HMGCS2, REG4, NBPF7, ADAM30, NOTCH2
TABLE 2.

List of 30 deleted genes in our patient associated with Mendelian disease phenotypes in the OMIM database

Gene SymbolFull Gene NameMIM IdentifierInheritanceOMIM Phenotype
ALX3
ALX homeobox 3
606014
AD
Frontonasal dysplasia 1
AMPD1
Adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1
102770
AR
Myopathy due to myoadenylate deaminase deficiency
AMPD2
Adenosine monophosphate deaminase 2
102771
AR
Spastic paraplegia 63Pontocerebellar hypoplasia, type 9
AP4B1
Adapter-related protein complex 4 subunit beta 1
607245
AR
Spastic paraplegia 47
ATP1A1
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 1
182310
AD
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, type 2DD; hypomagnesemia, seizures, and mental retardation 2
CASQ2
Calsequestrin 2
114251
AR
Ventricular tachycardia, catecholaminergic polymorphic, 2
DRAM2
DNA damage-regulated autophagy modulator 2
613360
AR
Cone-rod dystrophy 21
EPS8L3
EPS8-like 3
614989
AD
Hypotrichosis 5
GDAP2
Ganglioside-induced differentiation–associated protein 2
618128
AR
Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive 27
GNAI3
G protein subunit alpha i3
139370
AD
Auriculocondylar syndrome 1
GNAT2
G protein subunit alpha transducin 2
139340
AR
Achromatopsia 4
HMGCS2
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2
600234
AR
HMG-CoA synthase 2 deficiency
HSD3B2
Hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 2
613890
AR
Adrenal hyperplasia, congenital, due to 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 deficiency
IGSF3
Immunoglobulin superfamily member 3
603491
AR
Lacrimal duct defect
KCNA2
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2
176262
AD
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 32
KCND3
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3
605411
AD
Spinocerebellar ataxia 19 Brugada syndrome 9
LRIG2
Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 2
608869
AR
Urofacial syndrome 2
NGF
Nerve growth factor
162030
AR
Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type V
NOTCH2
Notch receptor 2
600275
AD
Alagille syndrome 2 Hajdu-Cheney syndrome
NRAS
NRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase
164790
AD
Noonan syndrome 6
PHGDH
Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase
606879
AR
Neu-Laxova syndrome 1; phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase deficiency
PTPN22
Protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 22
600716
AD
Systemic lupus erythematosus, susceptibility to
RBM15
RNA-binding motif protein 15
606077
 
Megakaryoblastic leukemia, acute
SLC16A1
Solute carrier family 16 member 1
600682
AD
Erythrocyte lactate transporter defect
 
 
 
AD
Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 7
 
 
 
AD, AR
Monocarboxylate transporter 1 deficiency
SLC6A17
Solute carrier family 6 member 17
610299
AR
Mental retardation, autosomal recessive 48
TBX15
T-box transcription factor 15
604127
AR
Cousin syndrome
TSHB
Thyroid-stimulating hormone subunit beta
188540
AR
Hypothyroidism, congenital, nongoitrous 4
VANGL1
VANGL planar cell polarity protein 1
610132
AD
Caudal regression syndrome
WARS2
Tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial
604733
AR
Neurodevelopmental disorder, mitochondrial, with abnormal movements and lactic acidosis, with or without seizures
WNT2B Wnt family member 2B601968ARDiarrhea 9

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; CoA = coenzyme A; HMG = hydroxymethylglutaryl; OMIM = Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man.

A: Whole-genome copy number variation and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) views demonstrated copy number lost on chromosome 1 (arrows). B: 10.5-Mb heterozygous deletion on chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 confirmed by copy number probes (upper 3 tracks) and SNP probes (bottom track). List of 148 genes in the deleted chromosome region List of 30 deleted genes in our patient associated with Mendelian disease phenotypes in the OMIM database AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; CoA = coenzyme A; HMG = hydroxymethylglutaryl; OMIM = Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. After a multidisciplinary discussion, the risks and benefits of transcranial surgery were acknowledged. The parents decided on conservative treatment for the bilateral squamosal synostosis. Coarctation of the aorta was successfully treated by a balloon angioplasty when the patient was 2 years of age. The patient is currently 4 years old and undergoing regular follow-up. There is no sign of increased intracranial pressure. Despite some progression, her neurological development is still delayed.

Discussion

Observations

We present an isolated case of a patient with bilateral squamosal suture synostosis with chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 deletion. A spectrum of unpatterned skull shapes (plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and scaphocephaly) has been reported to be linked with this synostosis.[1,5,7] In 2008, Greene et al. reported finding 1 case of isolated bilateral frontosphenoidal–bilateral squamosal suture synostosis among 518 patients in their database.[6] In 2010, Ranger et al.[1] presented 2 cases of squamosal synostosis. One was a nonsyndromic patient with unilateral squamosal synostosis, and the other was a patient with Crouzon syndrome with multiple synostoses, including bilateral squamosal sutures. Both patients, however, had good neurodevelopmental outcomes following extensive cranial vault remodeling.[1] In 2012, Smartt et al.[7] described 14 patients with squamosal synostosis with variations in disease presentation and treatment. Those researchers proposed that conservative treatment should be used for the initial management of isolated squamosal synostosis cases, such as close observation or the performance of helmet molding. In addition, they recommended that cranial vault surgery should be reserved for patients with an elevated intracranial pressure or substantial cranial asymmetry.[7] A study by Eley et al. also showed success in the conservative management of 5 cases of isolated squamosal synostosis.[8] That approach corresponds with our earlier report in which we proposed that surgical intervention is indicated in the presence of either a significant craniofacial deformity or raised intracranial hypertension contributing to neurodevelopmental delay.[9] No clear etiology has been identified as being associated with isolated bilateral squamosal synostosis. The condition has been reported in cases of syndromic craniosynostosis, including Crouzon, Pfeiffer, and Muenke syndromes.[1,7,8,10,11] A case report of a patient with Muenke syndrome with bilateral squamosal synostosis showed bilateral temporosquamosal and parietomastoid suture fusion, whereas the sphenosquamosal sutures were patent, on 3D-CT scans.[10] Those findings are relevant to our case presentation. Runyan et al. found that patients with an FGFR2 mutation had significantly higher synostosis of the squamosal arch (odds ratio 2.73).[12] However, an FGFR2 pathogenic variant was not identified in our reported case. Among the genes in the deleted chromosome region in our patient and known to cause Mendelian disease phenotypes, some have been reported to be related to craniofacial development. Twigg et al. identified mutations in ALX3 encoding aristaless-related ALX homeobox 3 transcription factor in 7 families with frontonasal dysplasia; craniosynostosis, however, was not mentioned.[13] Narro-Donate et al.[14] reported a case of a 30-month-old girl who had been diagnosed with Alagille syndrome and a unicoronal synostosis. The Alagille syndrome was a multisystem autosomal dominant disorder caused by NOTCH2 mutations.[14] Another study showed a correlation between TWIST1 and NOTCH2. Although TWIST1 positively regulates JAGGED1 in sutural mesenchyme, JAGGED1 represses NOTCH2. JAGGED1/NOTCH functions in the initial specification of sutural cells and in the boundary between the osteogenic and nonosteogenic compartments in the coronal suture.[15] The missing NOTCH2 might be one of the factors linked to the particular fused squamosal suture in our reported case. However, craniosynostosis has not been reported in patients with the chromosome deletions similar to those in our patient. Linhares et al. reviewed patients with deletion of chromosome 1p13.2 and adjacent regions and concluded that NRAS gene haploinsufficiency caused clinical features overlapping Noonan syndrome.[16] Our patient did not have facial features of Noonan syndrome, and her cardiac anomalies were not typical. Another possibility is a causative gene residing outside the deleted chromosome region.

Lessons

Our case revealed that an isolated squamosal suture synostosis could be an uncommon feature of chromosome 1p12–1p13.3 deletion. Further study such as whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing may reveal a pathogenic variant in the gene causing craniosynostosis.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Chaisrisawadisuk, Vatanavicharn, Anderson. Acquisition of data: Chaisrisawadisuk, Vatanavicharn. Analysis and interpretation of data: Chaisrisawadisuk, Vatanavicharn, Praphanphoj, Anderson. Drafting the article: Chaisrisawadisuk, Anderson, Moore. Critically revising the article: Chaisrisawadisuk, Vatanavicharn, Anderson. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: Chaisrisawadisuk, Vatanavicharn, Praphanphoj, Moore. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Chaisrisawadisuk. Administrative/technical/material support: Vatanavicharn, Praphanphoj. Study supervision: Anderson.
  16 in total

1.  Jagged1 functions downstream of Twist1 in the specification of the coronal suture and the formation of a boundary between osteogenic and non-osteogenic cells.

Authors:  Hai-Yun Yen; Man-Chun Ting; Robert E Maxson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Squamosal suture craniosynostosis in Muenke syndrome.

Authors:  Gaby D Doumit; Joseph Sidaoui; Eileen Meisler; Frank A Papay
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Squamosal Suture Synostosis: Incidence, Associations, and Implications for Treatment.

Authors:  Blake D Murphy; Navid Ajabshir; Nolan Altman; S Anthony Wolfe; Chad Perlyn
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Cranial suture closure as an age indicator: A review.

Authors:  Sittiporn Ruengdit; D Troy Case; Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Anterior Unilateral Plagiocephaly in Patient with Alagille Syndrome: Case Report.

Authors:  Jose María Narro-Donate; Paddy Méndez-Román; Antonio Huete-Allut; Jose Alberto Escribano-Mesa; Mario Gomar-Alba; Ascensión Contreras-Jiménez; Francisco Pedrero-García; Jose Masegosa-González
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 6.  Squamous Suture Synostosis: A Review With Emphasis on Cranial Morphology and Involvement of Other Cranial Sutures.

Authors:  Doug Chieffe; Lena Naffaa; Gaby Doumit
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 7.  CT of Normal Developmental and Variant Anatomy of the Pediatric Skull: Distinguishing Trauma from Normality.

Authors:  Sanjin Idriz; Jaymin H Patel; Seyed Ameli Renani; Rosemary Allan; Ioannis Vlahos
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Frontorhiny, a distinctive presentation of frontonasal dysplasia caused by recessive mutations in the ALX3 homeobox gene.

Authors:  Stephen R F Twigg; Sarah L Versnel; Gudrun Nürnberg; Melissa M Lees; Meenakshi Bhat; Peter Hammond; Raoul C M Hennekam; A Jeannette M Hoogeboom; Jane A Hurst; David Johnson; Alexis A Robinson; Peter J Scambler; Dianne Gerrelli; Peter Nürnberg; Irene M J Mathijssen; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Late presenting bilateral squamosal synostosis.

Authors:  Jason Diab; Peter J Anderson; Mark H Moore
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-04-20

10.  1p13.2 deletion displays clinical features overlapping Noonan syndrome, likely related to NRAS gene haploinsufficiency.

Authors:  Natália Duarte Linhares; Maíra Cristina Menezes Freire; Raony Guimarães Corrêa do Carmo Lisboa Cardenas; Heloisa Barbosa Pena; Katherine Lachlan; Bruno Dallapiccola; Carlos Bacino; Bruno Delobel; Paul James; Ann-Charlotte Thuresson; Göran Annerén; Sérgio D J Pena
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.771

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.