Literature DB >> 18766050

Phenotypically unusual combined craniosynostoses: presentation and management.

Arin K Greene1, John B Mulliken, Mark R Proctor, John G Meara, Gary F Rogers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although most craniosynostoses can be determined by pattern recognition, some patients defy phenotypic diagnosis and require computed tomography to determine sutural fusions.
METHODS: The authors' craniofacial database was reviewed for patients treated for craniosynostosis between 1989 and 2007. Children with single-suture synostosis, isolated bilateral coronal synostosis, and pansynostosis were excluded. Recorded variables included the pattern of sutural fusion, age at presentation, cranial shape, presence of elevated intracranial pressure, genetic testing, and types of operative correction.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 518 patients (7.5 percent) had phenotypically unusual combined forms of craniosynostoses. The most common were bilateral coronal-sagittal (30.8 percent), unilateral coronal-sagittal (10.3 percent), metopic-sagittal (10.3 percent), and bilateral lambdoid-sagittal (7.7 percent). Patients with fusion patterns involving both coronal sutures were more likely to have a mutation than those with other combinations (p = 0.01). Elevated intracranial pressure was noted in 76.9 percent of children. All patients underwent cranial repair; 33.3 percent had staged procedures, including early expansion followed by more definitive remodeling. Patients with bilateral coronal-sagittal or bilateral lambdoid-sagittal fusion had relatively normal head shapes (balanced dysmorphism). This subgroup was more likely to be syndromic and have operative intervention at an older age (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Children with phenotypically unusual combined craniosynostoses are likely to have a syndromic diagnosis and elevated intracranial pressure. Cranial expansion was delayed in patients with a balanced dysmorphism. Patients with combined synostoses often require staged procedures because of elevated intracranial pressure or major cranial asymmetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766050     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817f45f0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  Impact of genetics on the diagnosis and clinical management of syndromic craniosynostoses.

Authors:  Nneamaka B Agochukwu; Benjamin D Solomon; Maximilian Muenke
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Bilateral lambdoid and posterior sagittal craniosynostosis--management, evolution, and outcome.

Authors:  Shibu Pillai; D Cochrane; A Singhal; Paul Steinbok
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Reply to Dr. Ijichi's group.

Authors:  Takeyoshi Shimoji
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Genetic advances in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Wanda Lattanzi; Marta Barba; Lorena Di Pietro; Simeon A Boyadjiev
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Bilateral Coronal Synostosis and Mega Cisterna Magna: A Case Report.

Authors:  Craig Ballard; Jonathan Deck; Joe Iwanaga; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-07

7.  Bilateral squamosal synostosis: unusual presentation of chromosome 1p12-1p13.3 deletion. Illustrative case.

Authors:  Sarut Chaisrisawadisuk; Nithiwat Vatanavicharn; Verayuth Praphanphoj; Peter J Anderson; Mark H Moore
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-01-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.