Esther K Choo1, Chelsea Edwards2, Malik Abuwandi3, Kristina Carlson2, Jennifer Bonito2, Karen Jubanyik2, Thomas M Gill4, Fuad Abujarad2. 1. Center for Policy & Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare settings represent a missed opportunity to systematically identify and address mistreatment. Objective: Our objective was to obtain perspectives of older adults, caregivers, and emergency care providers regarding screening and intervention for elder mistreatment in the emergency department (ED) with a focus on utilizing digital health tools to facilitate the process. These findings will inform the development of a Web-based, digital health tool optimized for a tablet device to educate, screen, and facilitate reporting of elder mistreatment among patients presenting to the ED. Method: We conducted a qualitative study utilizing three in-person focus groups (N=31) with older adults from the community, caregivers for older adults, and clinicians and social workers who worked in the ED. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we identified attitudes about the process of divulging abuse, attitudes towards the ED as the location for screening and information delivery, and perceptions of digital tools for screening and information. Results: Participants identified numerous challenges to the disclosure of mistreatment, including feelings of vulnerability and concerns about losing their homes, social supports, and connection to caregivers. In contrast, they were uncertain about the benefits of disclosure. Digital tools were seen as helpful in terms of overcoming numerous challenges to screening, but participants suggested maintaining a human element to interactions. Conclusion: While challenges to elder mistreatment screening were identified, participants had recommendations for optimizing such efforts and responded positively to digital health tools as a means of screening.
Background: Healthcare settings represent a missed opportunity to systematically identify and address mistreatment. Objective: Our objective was to obtain perspectives of older adults, caregivers, and emergency care providers regarding screening and intervention for elder mistreatment in the emergency department (ED) with a focus on utilizing digital health tools to facilitate the process. These findings will inform the development of a Web-based, digital health tool optimized for a tablet device to educate, screen, and facilitate reporting of elder mistreatment among patients presenting to the ED. Method: We conducted a qualitative study utilizing three in-person focus groups (N=31) with older adults from the community, caregivers for older adults, and clinicians and social workers who worked in the ED. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we identified attitudes about the process of divulging abuse, attitudes towards the ED as the location for screening and information delivery, and perceptions of digital tools for screening and information. Results: Participants identified numerous challenges to the disclosure of mistreatment, including feelings of vulnerability and concerns about losing their homes, social supports, and connection to caregivers. In contrast, they were uncertain about the benefits of disclosure. Digital tools were seen as helpful in terms of overcoming numerous challenges to screening, but participants suggested maintaining a human element to interactions. Conclusion: While challenges to elder mistreatment screening were identified, participants had recommendations for optimizing such efforts and responded positively to digital health tools as a means of screening.
Authors: Megan L Ranney; Esther K Choo; Yvonne Wang; Andrew Baum; Melissa A Clark; Michael J Mello Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Lauren K Whiteside; Stephen T Chermack; Marc A Zimmerman; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Frederic C Blow; Maureen A Walton Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.451