Literature DB >> 22542311

Emergency department patients' preferences for technology-based behavioral interventions.

Megan L Ranney1, Esther K Choo, Yvonne Wang, Andrew Baum, Melissa A Clark, Michael J Mello.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess emergency department (ED) patients' preferences for technology-based behavioral interventions, and the demographic factors associated with these preferences.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of a random sample of urban ED patients (≥13 years) from a representative sample of shifts, with oversampling of adolescents/young adults (aged 13 to 24 years). Participants self-administered the survey about baseline technology use, concerns about technology-based interventions, and preferred intervention format for 7 behavioral health topics. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression (controlling for demographics and then additionally for baseline technology use) to identify factors differentially associated with technology preference for each behavioral topic.
RESULTS: Of patients presenting during research assistant shifts, 1,429 (≈59%) were screened and 664 (68.2% of eligible) consented to participate. Mean age was 31 years (SD 0.69); 54.5% were female, 64.1% were white, 23.2% were Hispanic, and 46.6% reported low income. Baseline use of computers (91.2%), Internet (70.7%), social networking (66.9%), mobile phones (95.0%), and text messaging (73.8%) was high. Participants reported interest in receiving interventions on each behavioral topic. Ninety percent preferred a technology-based intervention for at least 1 topic. Patients expressed greatest concerns about Internet (51.5%) and social networking (57.6%), particularly about confidentiality. Adjusting for sex, race, ethnicity, and income, younger age associated with preference for technology-based interventions for unintentional injuries (odds ratio 0.63 for technology preference if adult versus youth; 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.89) and peer violence (odds ratio 0.63 if adult; 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.92). Additionally adjusting for baseline technology usage, only baseline usage was associated with preference for technology-based interventions.
CONCLUSION: ED patients reported high baseline technology use, high interest in behavioral health interventions, and varying preferences for technology-based interventions. Future studies should address actual feasibility and acceptability of technology-based interventions in a more generalized population and ways to alleviate concerns about these interventions.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542311     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  39 in total

1.  Adolescent Balloon Analog Risk Task and Behaviors that Influence Risk of Motor Vehicle Crash Injury.

Authors:  Federico E Vaca; Jessica M Walthall; Sheryl Ryan; Alison Moriarty-Daley; Antonio Riera; Michael J Crowley; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2013

2.  Patient engagement and the design of digital health.

Authors:  Faith Birnbaum; Dana Lewis; Rochelle K Rosen; Megan L Ranney
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Use of mobile apps: a patient-centered approach.

Authors:  Lauren A Houdek VonHoltz; Kendra A Hypolite; Brendan G Carr; Frances S Shofer; Flaura K Winston; C William Hanson; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Implementation and Utility of an Automated Text Messaging System to Facilitate Symptom Self-Monitoring and Identify Risk for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Trauma Center Patients.

Authors:  Brian E Bunnell; Tatiana M Davidson; Jennifer R Winkelmann; Jessica L Maples-Keller; Leigh E Ridings; Jennifer Dahne; Samir M Fakhry; Kenneth J Ruggiero
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Wearable Devices and Biosensing: Future Frontiers.

Authors:  Peter R Chai
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-28

6.  A technology-augmented intervention to prevent peer violence and depressive symptoms among at-risk emergency department adolescents: Protocol for a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Megan L Ranney; John V Patena; Shira Dunsiger; Anthony Spirito; Rebecca M Cunningham; Edward Boyer; Nicole R Nugent
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Patient education self-management during surgical recovery: combining mobile (iPad) and a content management system.

Authors:  David J Cook; Anilga Moradkhani; Kristin S Vickers Douglas; Sharon K Prinsen; Erin N Fischer; Darrell R Schroeder
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.536

8.  Characteristics of youth seeking emergency care for assault injuries.

Authors:  Rebecca M Cunningham; Megan Ranney; Manya Newton; Whitney Woodhull; Marc Zimmerman; Maureen A Walton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  "I need to hear from women who have 'been there'": Developing a woman-focused intervention for drug use and partner violence in the emergency department.

Authors:  Esther Choo; K Morrow Guthrie; Michael Mello; Terrie F Wetle; Megan Ranney; Chantal Tapé; Caron Zlotnick
Journal:  Partner Abuse       Date:  2016-04

10.  Acceptability, language, and structure of text message-based behavioral interventions for high-risk adolescent females: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Megan L Ranney; Esther K Choo; Rebecca M Cunningham; Anthony Spirito; Margaret Thorsen; Michael J Mello; Kathleen Morrow
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.