Literature DB >> 36033380

Biological Validation and Observations of Formaldehyde Fumigation in Operational and Representative Scenarios in High-Containment Laboratories.

Jason Tearle1, Gary MacRae2, Spencer Andrews2, Anthony Clarke1, Jamie Stuart1, Gilles Tremblay2.   

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of formaldehyde as a fumigant in laboratories, for equipment, and for containment barrier decontamination applications was assessed, in particular the ability to reproduce biological inactivation (6-log reduction) of commercially available rapid biological indicators in representative operational scenarios and their relative sensitivity to other biological and chemical indicators.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to describe observations and results of formaldehyde fumigation efficacy in high-containment laboratories.
Results: Biological indicators placed throughout laboratory spaces, including ventilation ductwork at distances up to 15 meters, inside pieces of equipment and in lengths of pipe, were mostly negative, demonstrating the ability of formaldehyde to reach the interior and external surfaces tested. Dwell times as short as 10 minutes were shown to be sufficient in barrier decontamination equipment for the fumigation of personal computers. Furthermore, a pipework bore:length ratio of 1:1500 was proven too great a challenge. Indicators placed after extracting HEPA filters in microbiological safety cabinets (MBSCs) were also successfully fumigated (at room temperature) relying solely on diffusion and in the cabinet workspace at 10°C to 12°C. In addition, pressures of up to 900 Pa were experienced in low-leakage laboratory spaces during fumigation. Conclusions: Formaldehyde fumigation was shown to be effective in a variety of scenarios representing operational activities thereby giving process assurance. © ABSA International 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological indicators; chemical indicators; formaldehyde; fumigation; validation

Year:  2020        PMID: 36033380      PMCID: PMC9134618          DOI: 10.1177/1535676019895084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biosaf        ISSN: 1535-6760


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: present knowledge and future problems.

Authors:  A D Russell
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  A comparative study of methods to validate formaldehyde decontamination of biological safety cabinets.

Authors:  K Munro; J Lanser; R Flower
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The effect of relative humidity on swine vesicular disease virus in dried films before and during formaldehyde fumigation.

Authors:  E Batty; Y L Farmer; A J Breame; W Bruce
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1979-04

4.  [Dependency of a microbiological test of a formaldehyde gas sterilization procedure on the shape of objects to be sterilized].

Authors:  G Spicher; U Borchers
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B       Date:  1983-06

5.  Effect of relative humidity on formaldehyde decontamination.

Authors:  D R Spiner; R K Hoffmann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-12

6.  Disinfection with gaseous formaldehyde. Third Part: Bactericidal and sporicidal effectiveness of gaseous formaldehyde and level of residues in dependence on concentration, temperature and relative humidity.

Authors:  M L Casella; W Schmidt-Lorenz
Journal:  Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed       Date:  1989-09

7.  Biological safety cabinets, decontamination or sterilization with paraformaldehyde.

Authors:  R Fink; D F Liberman; K Murphy; D Lupo; E Israeli
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1988-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.