| Literature DB >> 36033105 |
Michael T Perino1, Michael J Myers1, Muriah D Wheelock1, Qiongru Yu2, Jennifer C Harper1, Megan F Manhart1, Evan M Gordon1, Adam T Eggebrecht1, Daniel S Pine3, Deanna M Barch1, Joan L Luby1, Chad M Sylvester1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric anxiety disorders are linked to dysfunction in multiple functional brain networks, as well as to alterations in the allocation of spatial attention. We used network-level analyses to characterize resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fc) alterations associated with 1) symptoms of anxiety and 2) alterations in stimulus-driven attention associated with pediatric anxiety disorders. We hypothesized that anxiety was related to altered connectivity of the frontoparietal, default mode, cingulo-opercular, and ventral attention networks and that anxiety-related connectivity alterations that include the ventral attention network would simultaneously be related to deviations in stimulus-driven attention.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 36033105 PMCID: PMC9417088 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.05.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci ISSN: 2667-1743
Descriptive Statistics of Demographic, Behavioral, Clinical, and Resting-State Functional Connectivity Data
|
| Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic Characteristics ( | |||
| Sex | |||
| Female | 31 | ||
| Male | 30 | ||
| Race | |||
| White | 50 | ||
| Black | 3 | ||
| Asian | 1 | ||
| Biracial/multiracial | 7 | ||
| Age, Years | 10.48 | 1.33 | |
| Clinical Psychopathology Measures | |||
| PARS severity sum scores | 15.20 | 8.96 | |
| CDI-Child total | 5.85 | 5.23 | |
| CDI-Parent total | 8.56 | 6.25 | |
| Connors-3: Hyperactivity | 2.18 | 2.87 | |
| Connors-3: Inattention | 2.46 | 2.34 | |
| RS-fMRI Characteristics | |||
| Days between sessions | 41.61 | 45.10 | |
| Mean filtered FD, mm | 0.029 | 0.008 | |
| Retained frames per subject | 1760.62 | 832.44 | |
| Retained data per subject, min | 21.13 | 9.99 |
CDI, Children’s Depression Inventory; FD, framewise displacement; PARS, Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale; RS-fMRI, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 1.Functional network assignment and resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) correlation matrix. (A) We used a variation of a validated functional network cortical parcellation scheme (37,54). After removing cortical regions that were unassigned, 292 regions reflecting 15 different functional networks remained for enrichment analyses. (B) The average resting-state functional connectivity matrix for all region-of-interest pairs (292 × 292) were organized by functional network assignment. The blocks of color on the top and left side of the matrix indicate the functional brain network assignments of associated regions, with the color key identical to (A). As expected, regions from the same network tended to be more strongly correlated than regions from different networks.
Figure 2.Significant relations of anxiety to resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fc). (A) To perform enrichment analyses, Spearman’s correlation between anxiety and every region-region connectivity value were computed. (B) Connections determined to be significant (p < .05) were identified and binarized to provide a numerical representation of the number of significant connections within each network pair. (C) Hypergeometric tests were run to identify network pairs that had a statistically significant number of region-region connections associated with anxiety, with the color scale providing −log10 p values (corresponding to a ceiling of p < .01). (D) Elevated anxiety was related to increased network-network connectivity of the following network pairs: cingulo-opercular network (CON) to default mode network (DMN), and CON to ventral attention network (VAN). Elevated anxiety was related to decreased network-network connectivity of the following network pairs: CON to visual (VIS), CON to primary visual (PrimVis), CON to CON, and motor mouth (MM) to PrimVis. Each spherical node is centered at the parcel centroid, with larger nodes reflecting a greater number of connections related to anxiety. PARS, Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale.
Figure 3.Significant relations of stimulus-driven attention to resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fc). (A) The relationship of stimulus-driven attention to the rs-fc matrix was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. (B) Connections determined to be significant (p < .05) were identified and binarized to provide a numerical representation of the number of significant connections within each network pair. (C) Hypergeometric tests were run to identify network pairs that had a statistically significant number of region-region connections associated with stimulus-driven attention, with the color scale providing −log10 p values (corresponding to a ceiling of p < .01). (D) Elevated stimulus-driven attention was related to increased network-network connectivity of the following network pairs: frontoparietal network (FPN) to default mode network (DMN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) to ventral attention network (VAN). Elevated stimulus-driven attention was related to decreased network-network connectivity of the following network pairs: VAN to DMN, CON to premotor (PreM), and medial parietal (Med-Par) to auditory (Aud). Each spherical node is centered at the parcel centroid, with larger nodes reflecting a greater number of connections related to stimulus-driven attention.
Figure 4.Unique and shared connections between cingulo-opercular network (CON) and ventral attention network (VAN) related to anxiety and stimulus-driven attention. (A) The 54 CON-VAN region-of-interest pairs significantly related to anxiety but not stimulus-driven attention. (B) The 55 CON-VAN region-of-interest pairs significantly related to stimulus-driven attention but not anxiety. (C) The 24 CON-VAN region-of-interest pairs significantly related to both anxiety and stimulus-driven attention. These 24 connections in (C) primarily consist of bilateral posterior superior temporal sulcus regions in the VAN connecting to disparate CON regions. Node size reflects the number of significant connections related to each region. Line color indicates the direction of the relation (red = positive connectivity; blue = negative connectivity).