Literature DB >> 36032975

Enhancing antibody responses by multivalent antigen display on thymus-independent DNA origami scaffolds.

Eike-Christian Wamhoff, Larance Ronsard, Jared Feldman, Blake M Hauser, Grant A Knappe, Anna Romanov, Evan Lam, Kerri St Denis, Alejandro B Balazs, Aaron Schmidt, Daniel Lingwood, Mark Bathe.   

Abstract

Multivalent antigen display is a well-established design principle to enhance humoral immunity elicited by subunit vaccines. Protein-based virus-like particles (VLPs) are an important vaccine platform that implements this principle but also contain thymus-dependent off-target epitopes, thereby generating neutralizing and defocused antibody responses against the scaffold itself. Here, we present DNA origami as an alternative platform to display the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2. DNA-based scaffolds provide nanoscale control over antigen organization and, as thymus-independent antigens, are expected to induce only extrafollicular B-cell responses. Our icosahedral DNA-based VLPs elicited valency-dependent BCR signaling in two reporter B-cell lines, with corresponding increases in RBD-specific antibody responses following sequential immunization in mice. Mouse sera also neutralized the Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 - but did not contain boosted, DNA-specific antibodies. Thus, multivalent display using DNA origami can enhance immunogenicity of protein antigens without generating scaffold-directed immunological memory and may prove useful for rational vaccine design.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36032975      PMCID: PMC9413718          DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.16.504128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  bioRxiv


Introduction

The multivalent display of antigens at the nanoscale has been demonstrated to improve the immunogenicity of subunit vaccines[1-3]. Nanoparticulate vaccines with diameters between 20 and 200 nm ensure efficient trafficking to secondary lymphoid organs[4]. In secondary lymphoid organs, high valency and avidity promote B-cell receptor (BCR) crosslinking and signaling as well as BCR-mediated antigen uptake, thereby driving early B-cell activation and humoral immunity[5-12]. The importance of BCR signaling for antibody responses was initially recognized for thymus-independent (TI) antigens, particularly of the TI-2 class[13-15]. The multivalent display of these non-protein antigens induces BCR crosslinking in the absence of T-cell help, ensuring that antibody responses proceed through extrafollicular B-cell pathways and thereby limiting germinal center (GC) reactions, affinity maturation and induction of B-cell memory[16-17]. Multivalent antigen display also enhances the BCR-mediated response to thymus-dependent (TD) antigens including proteins[7-8]. In this context, follicular T-cell help enables GC reactions to generate affinity-matured B-cell memory that can be boosted or recalled upon antigen reexposure[18-20]. Consequently, the nanoscale organization of antigens represents a well-established vaccine design principle, not only for TI antigens, but also to elicit humoral immunity through the TD pathway[1-3]. Leveraging this design principle, native and engineered protein-based virus-like particles (P-VLPs) have emerged as an important platform for multivalent subunit vaccines[21-36]. P-VLPs enable the rigid display of antigens and have recently been used to investigate the impact of valency on B-cell activation in vivo to greater detail, suggesting differential regulation of affinity maturation and enhanced breadth of antibody responses at high valency[7-9]. However, valency control remains limited by the number of distinct protein components used for VLP assembly or by statistical functionalization with antigens—and is typically dependent on scaffold size and geometry. Notably, protein-based scaffolds are also TD antigens that elicit humoral immunity, including both T- and B-cell memory[36-37]. These scaffolds contain, and multivalently display, off-target epitopes that can defocus antibody responses, and such defocusing competes with the principles of rational vaccine design[38-39]. Scaffold-directed immunological memory can further complicate sequential or diversified immunizations with a given P-VLP, resulting in antibody-dependent clearance of the vaccine platform[40-41]. We sought to address these limitations by combining rigid, multivalent antigen display with scaffolds composed of TI antigens. We hypothesized that such nanoscale organization could promote TD antibody responses against protein antigens but confine scaffold-directed B-cell responses to the non-boostable, extrafollicular pathway devoid of immunological memory. Wireframe DNA origami provides access to designer VLPs of controlled geometry and size at the 20 to 200 nm scale with independently programmable geometry, valency and stoichiometry of antigen display[42-46]. We and others recently leveraged this platform to probe the nanoscale parameters of IgM recognition and of BCR signaling in reporter B-cell lines, suggesting that increased antigen spacing up to 30 nm promotes early B-cell activation[47-48]. However, these nanoscale design rules remain to be validated in vivo. While the utility of DNA-based VLPs (DNA-VLPs) to enhance antibody responses has not been demonstrated, DNA origami has been successfully employed to deliver therapeutic cargo to tumors in mice[49-50]. Other examples of in vivo delivery include the co-formulation of antigens and adjuvants to elicit T-cell immunity[51]. Importantly, and in contrast to P-VLPs, DNA-based scaffolds constitute TI antigens and should therefore be excluded from the boostable follicular pathway[51-52]. As proof-of-concept, we report on the fabrication of DNA-VLPs functionalized with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) derived from the spike glycoprotein, a key target for eliciting neutralizing antibodies against the virus[53-56]. Our nanoparticulate vaccine displayed enhanced binding to ACE2-expressing cells and induced valency-dependent BCR signaling in vitro. Following sequential immunization in mice, we observed corresponding valency-dependent enhancement of RBD-specific antibody responses and B-cell memory recall. Mouse sera also efficiently neutralized the Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 for DNA-VLPs compared with monomeric RBD—but did not contain boosted, DNA-specific antibodies. Taken together, our findings suggest that DNA origami can be leveraged for multivalent antigen display without eliciting TD B-cell responses against the DNA-based scaffold, rendering this platform useful for rational vaccine design.

Results and Discussion

The spherical SARS-CoV-2 virion is approximately 100 nm in diameter and displays approximately 100 trimeric spike glycoproteins[57]. Each monomer contains the RBD which is essential for engaging the ACE2 receptor and viral uptake, rendering it a key target of neutralizing antibody responses[53-56]. We adapted our previous DAEDALUS design, an icosahedral DNA-VLP with 50 potential conjugation sites and approximately 34 nm in diameter, to display the RBD and investigate impact of nanoscale antigen organization by DNA origami on B-cell activation[48]. A covalent in situ functionalization strategy employing strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) chemistry was used for antigen attachment (Figure 1A)[44]. Towards this end, we synthesized 30 oligonucleotide staples bearing triethylene glycol (TEG)-DBCO groups at their 5’ ends to assembly DNA-VLPs symmetrically displaying 1x, 6x or 30x DBCO groups on their exterior (Figure S1, Table S1 to S3). Employing a reoxidation strategy, the RBD was selectively modified at an engineered C-terminal Cys with a SMCC-TEG-azide linker and subsequently incubated with DBCO-bearing DNA origami to fabricate I52–1x-, 6x-, 30x-RBD (Figures 1B and S2, Note S1). The optimization of reaction conditions yielded near-quantitative conversion and coverage of more than 80% of conjugation sites on average as determined by denaturing, reversed-phase HPLC and Trp fluorescence (Figures 1C and S3). Notably, conversion was dependent on maximum DBCO concentrations and we obtained only up to 30% coverage for I52–1x-RBD. The monodispersity of purified DNA-VLPs was validated by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Figure 1D). Analysis of I52–30x-RBD via negative-strain transmission electron microscopy (TEM) validated structural integrity of the DNA origami (Figure 1E and S4). While the icosahedral geometry could not be fully resolved, presumably due to accumulation of uranyl formate in the interior of the DNA origami, antigens were clearly visible and organized symmetrically.
Figure 1.

Design and synthesis of DNA-VLPs covalently displaying the SARS-CoV-2 RBD.

(A) Recombinant RBD bearing an additional Cys residue at the C-terminus was expressed. The C-terminal Cys was selectively labeled with and SMCC-TEG-azide linker and subsequently conjugated to DBCO-bearing DNA-VLPs. The icosahedral DNA origami objects of approximately 50 nm diameter displaying 1, 6 and 30 copies of the RBD were fabricated. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) shows the gel shift due to increasing RBD copy number as well as low polydispersity of the VLPs samples after purification. An additional VLP bearing 5 copies of Cy5 was produced for ACE2-binding flow cytometry experiments. (C) The coverage of the DNA-VLPs with RBD was quantified via Trp fluorescence. (D) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to assess the dispersity of functionalized VLP samples. Representative histograms are shown. (E) Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of I52–30x-RBD were obtained by negative staining using 2% uranyl formate and validate the symmetric nanoscale organization of antigens. Coverage values were determined from n = 3 biological replicates for I52–1x-RBD and from n = 6 biological replicates for I52–6x and 30x-RBD. Diameters were determined from 3 technical replicates.

To investigate the binding activity of RBD-Az before and after conjugation to DNA-VLPs, we conducted flow cytometry experiments with ACE2-expressing HEK293 cells (Figure 2A). Initially, monovalent binding of wild-type RBD and fluorophore-labeled RBD-Cy5, obtained by selectively labeling the azide, was compared (Figure 2B and C). The RBD constructs were incubated at 200 nM with the HEK293 cells and bound antigen was detected using the previously described anti-RBD antibody CR3022[56]. These experiments revealed comparable binding between the two constructs, demonstrating preservation of the receptor binding motif (RBM) and the viability of the reoxidation strategy for selective labeling of the terminal Cys (Figure S2, Note S1). Next, we explored whether multivalent RBD display using DNA-VLPs would result in increased avidity. Two additional fluorophore-labeled VLPs, I52–30x-RBD-5x-Cy5 and I52–5x-Cy5, were synthesized to allow for direct detection of binding (Figure 1B and S1). Indeed, binding of the RBD-functionalized VLPs was significantly enhanced compared to monomeric RBD-Cy5, while no binding was observed for the I52–5x-Cy5 (Figure 2D and E). When correcting for Cy5 brightness per RBD, I52–30x-RBD-5x-Cy5 displayed approximately one order of magnitude higher median fluorescence intensity compared with monomeric RBD-Cy5, indicative of avidity effects for VLP recognition.
Figure 2.

In vitro activity of RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs.

(A) An overview of the in vitro activity assays and corresponding DNA-VLPs is shown. (B and C) ACE2-expressing HEK293 cells were incubated with 200 nM RBD. Binding was detected in flow cytometry experiments using PE-labeled CR3022 and a PE-labeled secondary antibody, demonstrating preserved binding activity for chemically modified RBD-Cy5 compared to wild-type RBD. (D and E) Incubation with Cy5-labeled I52–30x-RBD at 100 nM RBD revealed enhanced binding compared to RBD-Cy5 due to multivalency effects. No unspecific binding for non-functionalized I52 was observed. The brightness of Cy5-labeled I52–30x-RBD (5 Cy5 per 30 RBDs) and RBD-Cy5 (1 Cy5 per 1 RBD) was quantified experimentally (Figure S4) and MFI values were corrected accordingly. (F and G) Ramos B cells expressing the BCRs C3022 and B38 were incubated with α-IgM, wild-type RBD or RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs at 30 nM RBD. Ca2+ flux in response to RBD incubation was assayed using Fura Red. Representative fluorescence intensity curves are shown (top). Total Ca2+ flux was quantified via the normalized AUC, revealing robust activation of BCR-expressing Ramos B cells by functionalized DNA-VLPs (bottom). No stimulation was observed for wild-type RBD or for non-functionalized I52. Representative histograms are shown for ACE2 binding assays and MFI values were determined from n = 3 biological replicates. Normalized AUC values were determined from n = 3 biological replicates.

We then evaluated the capacity of RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs to induce BCR signaling using a previously described Ca2+ flux assay (Figure 2A)[58]. Specifically, Ramos B-cell lines expressing the somatic CR3022 or B38 antibodies were established[56, 59]. BCR signaling was initially validated by incubation with an anti-IgM antibody. At 30 nM antigen, monomeric wild-type RBD did not elicit B-cell activation in vitro (Figure 2F and G). By contrast, incubation of the Ramos B cells with multivalent DNA-VLPs at the same antigen concentration resulted in efficient BCR signaling. We further observed valency-dependent increases in total Ca2+ flux for both cell lines with I52–30x-RBD being more potent than I52–6x-RBD. CR3022 (KD = 0.27 μM, Figure 2F) and B38 (KD = 1.00 μM, Figure 2G) bind distinct RBD epitopes with moderate monovalent affinity as reported for the corresponding Fab fragments[60]. Despite this 4-fold difference in affinity, we observed comparable total BCR signaling relative to the IgM control for all functionalized DNA-VLPs, consistent with previously described avidity effects at the B-cell surface[61]. We concluded that our DNA-VLPs efficiently interacted with and induced signaling by RBD-specific BCRs, analogous to previous studies using similar assays to evaluate multivalent subunit vaccines[58, 62–68]. The increased B-cell activation for I52–30x-RBD contrasts our previous findings for HIV antigens for which total Ca2+ flux saturated beyond a valency of 10x[48]. Notably, the antigen-BCR systems differ with respect to affinity and mode of antigen attachment: The affinity of the HIV antigen was substantially higher (eOD-GT8, KD = 30 pM) and the antigens were non-covalently attached to DNA origami using rigid DNA-PNA duplexes. Next, we investigated whether RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs could activate B-cells in vivo and induce antibody responses. C57BL/6 mice were sequentially immunized with monomeric wild-type RBD, I52–6x-RBD and I52–30x-RBD at doses equivalent to 7.5 μg RBD (Figure 3A and S3). IgG responses against the RBD were monitored throughout this regimen using ELISA and correlated with our in vitro BCR signaling findings (Figure 3B and S5). Post-boost 1, we observed an approximately 130-fold increase in endpoint dilutions for the 30-valent DNA-VLP over monomeric RBD. I52–6x-RBD did not enhance the B-cell response and elicited comparable antibody titers to monomeric RBD, both post-boost 1 and 2. Overall, endpoint dilutions were further increased post-boost 2 but converged between the groups. Earlier and stronger boosting of IgG titers and efficient B-cell memory recall is a hallmark of multivalent versus monomeric subunit vaccines[22-23]. Our findings are further consistent with enhanced IgG titers elicited by P-VLPs of increasing the valency[7-9]. Notably, we did not observe boosting of DNA-specific IgG titers against the scaffold, indicating an absence of B-cell memory for the DNA-VLP (Figure 3C and S6). While this finding was expected for TI antigens such as DNA, it was also established that TD antibody responses can be generated against TI antigens by covalent attachment to protein antigens[69-70]. The inverse case does not appear to be the default—scaffolding protein antigens with TI antigens does not direct the B-cell response to the extrafollicular pathway. By contrast, we observed valency-dependent TD antibody responses to the RBD, akin to virosomal and ISCOM-based vaccine design principles in which protein antigens are multivalently displayed by TI antigen-composed matrices[71-74]. The valency-dependent enhancement of RBD-specific antibody responses was further reflected in the efficient neutralization of the wild-type, Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 3D)[75-76]. These findings suggest that immunization with I52–30x-RBD not only resulted in increased IgG titers but also induced functionally improved humoral immunity.
Figure 3.

Antibody responses to RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs.

(A) Mice were immunized intraperitoneally with monomeric RBD and RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs of varying copy number following a prime-boost-boost regimen. (B) RBD-specific IgG endpoint dilutions were determined via ELISA, revealing enhanced antibody responses for I52–30x-RBD compared to both monomeric RBD and I52–6x-RBD. (C) DNA-VLPs did not elicit enhanced DNA-specific IgG titers compared to monomeric RBD as measured by ELISA. Importantly, DNA-specific IgG were not increased after boost immunizations with DNA-VLPs. DNA-specific IgG was diluted from 10 μg/ml. (D) Serum neutralization titers expressed as NT50 values against pseudoviruses modeling the wild-type, Wuhan strain were determined. We observed enhanced, valency-dependent neutralization efficiency for I52–30x-RBD. Mice were immunized with 7.5 ug RBD. IgG titers, RBD-specific IgG B cell fractions and NT50 values were determined from n = 5 biological replicates. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test at α = 0.05.

Conclusions

Here, we report on the use of wireframe DNA origami to program the display of SARS-CoV-2 antigens. RBD-functionalized DNA-VLPs efficiently bound to the ACE2 receptor and activated B cells in vitro. BCR signaling increased with DNA-VLP valency and no saturation effects were observed for up to 30x RBD antigens. We further demonstrate the utility of DNA-VLPs as an in vivo platform for rational vaccine design. In particular, we provide proof-of-concept that multivalent DNA-VLPs can enhance TD antigen-specific humoral immunity in mice, but, as TI scaffolds, do not generate boostable B-cell memory against the vaccine platform itself. Because DNA origami also offers independent control over VLP size and geometry versus multivalent antigen display, DNA-based scaffolds may prove particularly useful if epitope focusing and nanoscale control are desired. By contrast, several P-VLPs explored as multivalent subunit vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses elicit scaffold-directed humoral immunity[30–31, 36–37]—and the defocusing of RBD-specific antibody responses has been shown to reduce cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants[37]. Maintaining antigen display in B-cell follicles over time has been shown to promote GC reactions and humoral immunity[77-78]. While our findings suggest that non-protected, covalently functionalized DNA-VLPs are sufficiently stable to enhance antibody responses, it will thus be important to investigate to what extent multivalent antigen display is maintained in secondary lymphoid organs in the presence of nuclease degradation[79-80]. Trafficking to secondary lymphoid organs and B-cell activation might also be enhanced by varying DNA-VLP size and valency, for example to mimic SARS-CoV-2 virions[57]. Beyond vaccine design, our findings are of potential importance to gene therapy by addressing antibody-dependent clearance[40-41]—with DNA origami emerging as an alternative delivery platform[81].

Methods

Methods are described in the Supporting Information.
  81 in total

1.  B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation.

Authors:  F D Batista; D Iber; M S Neuberger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sustained antigen availability during germinal center initiation enhances antibody responses to vaccination.

Authors:  Hok Hei Tam; Mariane B Melo; Myungsun Kang; Jeisa M Pelet; Vera M Ruda; Maria H Foley; Joyce K Hu; Sudha Kumari; Jordan Crampton; Alexis D Baldeon; Rogier W Sanders; John P Moore; Shane Crotty; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson; Arup K Chakraborty; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Particulate Array of Well-Ordered HIV Clade C Env Trimers Elicits Neutralizing Antibodies that Display a Unique V2 Cap Approach.

Authors:  Paola Martinez-Murillo; Karen Tran; Javier Guenaga; Gustaf Lindgren; Monika Àdori; Yu Feng; Ganesh E Phad; Néstor Vázquez Bernat; Shridhar Bale; Jidnyasa Ingale; Viktoriya Dubrovskaya; Sijy O'Dell; Lotta Pramanik; Mats Spångberg; Martin Corcoran; Karin Loré; John R Mascola; Richard T Wyatt; Gunilla B Karlsson Hedestam
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  A Tubular DNA Nanodevice as a siRNA/Chemo-Drug Co-delivery Vehicle for Combined Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Zhaoran Wang; Linlin Song; Qing Liu; Run Tian; Yingxu Shang; Fengsong Liu; Shaoli Liu; Shuai Zhao; Zihong Han; Jiashu Sun; Qiao Jiang; Baoquan Ding
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Virus-like display of a neo-self antigen reverses B cell anergy in a B cell receptor transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Bryce Chackerian; Marisa R Durfee; John T Schiller
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 6.  Protein-based antigen presentation platforms for nanoparticle vaccines.

Authors:  Brian Nguyen; Niraj H Tolia
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 7.344

7.  Quadrivalent influenza nanoparticle vaccines induce broad protection.

Authors:  Seyhan Boyoglu-Barnum; Daniel Ellis; Rebecca A Gillespie; Geoffrey B Hutchinson; Young-Jun Park; Syed M Moin; Oliver J Acton; Rashmi Ravichandran; Mike Murphy; Deleah Pettie; Nick Matheson; Lauren Carter; Adrian Creanga; Michael J Watson; Sally Kephart; Sila Ataca; John R Vaile; George Ueda; Michelle C Crank; Lance Stewart; Kelly K Lee; Miklos Guttman; David Baker; John R Mascola; David Veesler; Barney S Graham; Neil P King; Masaru Kanekiyo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  Safety and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Paul T Heath; Eva P Galiza; David N Baxter; Marta Boffito; Duncan Browne; Fiona Burns; David R Chadwick; Rebecca Clark; Catherine Cosgrove; James Galloway; Anna L Goodman; Amardeep Heer; Andrew Higham; Shalini Iyengar; Arham Jamal; Christopher Jeanes; Philip A Kalra; Christina Kyriakidou; Daniel F McAuley; Agnieszka Meyrick; Angela M Minassian; Jane Minton; Patrick Moore; Imrozia Munsoor; Helen Nicholls; Orod Osanlou; Jonathan Packham; Carol H Pretswell; Alberto San Francisco Ramos; Dinesh Saralaya; Ray P Sheridan; Richard Smith; Roy L Soiza; Pauline A Swift; Emma C Thomson; Jeremy Turner; Marianne E Viljoen; Gary Albert; Iksung Cho; Filip Dubovsky; Greg Glenn; Joy Rivers; Andreana Robertson; Kathy Smith; Seth Toback
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein.

Authors:  Alexandra C Walls; Young-Jun Park; M Alejandra Tortorici; Abigail Wall; Andrew T McGuire; David Veesler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Engineering an Antibody V Gene-Selective Vaccine.

Authors:  Larance Ronsard; Ashraf S Yousif; Julianne Peabody; Vintus Okonkwo; Pascal Devant; Alemu Tekewe Mogus; Ralston M Barnes; Daniel Rohrer; Nils Lonberg; David Peabody; Bryce Chackerian; Daniel Lingwood
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.