Literature DB >> 36032846

Assessment of Hidden Hearing Loss in Individuals Exposed to Occupational Noise Using Cochlear, Neural, Temporal Functions and Quality of Life Measures.

Shubhaganga Dhrruvakumar1, Tejaswini Shambhu1, Sreeraj Konadath1.   

Abstract

The present study aims to identify the objective tests that can identify hidden hearing loss in a group of individuals exposed to occupational noise, which is not otherwise evident as a clinically relevant permanent threshold shift. A standard group comparison design was used to study the hidden auditory effect of occupational noise on traffic police officers. A total of 50 participants (n = 25 exposed to occupational noise; n = 25 non-occupational noise-exposed) were included in the study. The test battery comprised of behavioral tests (hearing thresholds from 250 to 16,000 Hz), fine structure Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE's) as physiological measure, Click and CE-chirp® evoked auditory brain stem response (ABR) as electrophysiological, and Gap detection test (GDT) and Temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF) as psychophysical measures. Among the measures evaluated, extended high-frequency audiometry, fine structure DPOAE amplitude, CE-chirp® ABR, GDT, and TMTF showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the traffic police individuals exposed to occupational noise and the controls. However, routine audiometry and click-evoked ABR did not show any significant differences. The high-frequency audiometric thresholds, fine structure DPOAEs, CE-chirp® evoked ABR, GDT and TMTF have been shown to be affected in individuals exposed to occupational noise. This finding indicates a hidden hearing loss in the study group. Hence, this study paves the way for early identification and intervention of noise-induced hearing loss by including these measures along with routine test protocol in susceptible individuals. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear physiology; Hidden hearing loss; Traffic noise; Traffic police

Year:  2021        PMID: 36032846      PMCID: PMC9411355          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02373-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  35 in total

1.  [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss].

Authors:  Y Wang; B Yang; Y Li; L Hou; Y Hu; Y Han
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2000-02

2.  Normal auditory brainstem response in patients with acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  S A Telian; P R Kileny; J K Niparko; J L Kemink; M D Graham
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing.

Authors:  Elvira Brattico; Teija Kujala; Mari Tervaniemi; Paavo Alku; Luigi Ambrosi; Vincenzo Monitillo
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Yanmei Feng; Shankai Yin; Michael Kiefte; Jian Wang
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A review of the effects of selective inner hair cell lesions on distortion product otoacoustic emissions, cochlear function and auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  R. J. Salvi; D. Ding; J. Wang; H-Y. Jiang
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  The relationship of pulsed, continuous, and warble extended-high frequency thresholds.

Authors:  T A Hamill; W H Haas
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi; Dalian Ding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory brainstem responses for click and CE-chirp stimuli in individuals with and without occupational noise exposure.

Authors:  Zeena Venkatacheluvaiah Pushpalatha; Sreeraj Konadath
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Auditory Brainstem Response Latency in Noise as a Marker of Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Ann E Hickox; Hari M Bharadwaj; Hannah Goldberg; Sarah Verhulst; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.