| Literature DB >> 36031822 |
Samuel Manzano-Carrasco1, Jorge Garcia-Unanue1, Jorge Lopez-Fernandez1,2, Antonio Hernandez-Martin1, Javier Sanchez-Sanchez2, Leonor Gallardo1, Jose Luis Felipe2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the associations of maturity status, chronological age and sex with physical fitness and body composition among active children.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36031822 PMCID: PMC9421410 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Public Health ISSN: 1101-1262 Impact factor: 4.424
Descriptive characteristics of the participants and body composition and PF variables
| Boys ( | Girls ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Prepubertal | Pubertal | Prepubertal | Pubertal |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| Age (years) | 9.84 ± 1.75 | 14.35 ± 1.11 | 9.56 ± 1.79 | 14.08 ± 1.01 |
| Weekly sports practice (day/week) | 3.20 ± 1.53 | 4.16 ± 2.38 | 2.74 ± 1.73 | 3.76 ± 2.53 |
| Sports practice (years) | 3.92 ± 2.10 | 6.13 ± 3.20 | 3.00 ± 1.76 | 4.46 ± 2.99 |
| Weight (kg) | 38.73 ± 11.56 | 59.00 ± 13.65 | 36.58 ± 11.40 | 55.41 ± 10.48 |
| Height (cm) | 140.64 ± 11.75 | 165.18 ± 9.62 | 138.13 ± 12.58 | 159.02 ± 6.68 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.22 ± 3.55 | 21.45 ± 3.74 | 18.75 ± 3.40 | 21.87 ± 3.76 |
| Total fat mass (kg) | 9.64 ± 5.51 | 12.69 ± 6.39 | 9.95 ± 4.99 | 16.51 ± 6.38 |
| Fat mass (%) | 23.60 ± 6.62 | 20.65 ± 6.31 | 26.13 ± 5.50 | 28.94 ± 5.96 |
| Total muscle mass (kg) | 27.52 ± 6.78 | 43.91 ± 8.49 | 25.24 ± 6.71 | 36.92 ± 4.98 |
| Muscle mass (%) | 72.23 ± 6.20 | 75.26 ± 5.96 | 69.99 ± 5.18 | 67.42 ± 5.65 |
| 20 mSRT (stages) | 4.97 ± 2.02 | 7.64 ± 2.20 | 3.84 ± 1.60 | 4.94 ± 1.64 |
| 20 mSRT (pc) | 66.26 ± 24.04 | 59.20 ± 24.08 | 73.61 ± 22.56 | 61.60 ± 26.71 |
| Handgrip (kg) | 18.08 ± 6.18 | 32.68 ± 9.27 | 16.12 ± 5.50 | 24.67 ± 4.89 |
| Handgrip (pc) | 53.82 ± 28.90 | 49.55 ± 29.39 | 53.52 ± 30.93 | 47.75 ± 27.57 |
| CMJ (cm) | 20.79 ± 4.93 | 31.19 ± 6.40 | 19.71 ± 4.61 | 25.25 ± 5.25 |
| CMJ (pc) | 48.76 ± 26.49b | 32.86 ± 19.93 | 50.79 ± 26.07 | 39.22 ± 23.93 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation in continuous variables. BMI, body mass index; 20 mSRT, 20-m shuttle-run test; Handgrip, handgrip strength; CMJ, countermovement jump; pc, percentile; kg, kilograms; cm, centimetres.
The difference in means between each sex group in each maturity stage is significant at the 0.05 level.
The difference in means between maturity stage in each sex group is significant at the 0.05 level.
Figure 1Relationship between age and average performance in PF tests (20 mSRT, handgrip strength and CMJ) for boys and girls aged 6–17. Note: observed values are plotted using triangles and circles for boys and girls, respectively. Solid and dashed lines display the predicted values of the linear regression models in the boys’ and girls’ groups, respectively
Correlation between the normalized variables of body composition and PF
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (muscle mass %) | (20 mSRT) | (CMJ) | ||
|
| 1 | 0.489a | −0.144a | 0.454a |
|
| 1 | 0.235a | 0.613a | |
|
| 1 | 0.386a | ||
|
| 1 |
20 mSRT, 20 m shuttle-run test; Handgrip, handgrip strength; CMJ, countermovement jump.
P < 0.01.
Figure 2Global Z score. Note: the quartiles are calculated by the summing of the four Z scores for each variable. The bars show the mean value of each Z score in this quartile