| Literature DB >> 36030215 |
Zeyu Lin1, Haiping Zeng2, Wenjun Xiong2, Jin Li2, Yan Chen3, Lijie Luo2, Yansheng Zheng2, Zhuoxuan Zhang1, Wei Wang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic five-step maneuver inferior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has superiority in lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection and digestive tract reconstruction. However, the right pleura was probably ruptured in this surgical technique. The aim of this study was to explore whether the infracardiac bursa (ICB) exposed could protect right pleura.Entities:
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction; Five-step maneuver; Infracardiac bursa; Right pleura; Siewert type II
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36030215 PMCID: PMC9419360 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10024-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.638
Fig. 1a before the ICB exposed. b the ICB was being exposed. c after the ICB exposed. d after the No.112pulR, and the No.112aoA dissected. RC, right diaphragmatic crus; ES, esophagus; ICB, infracardiac bursa; TA, thoracic aorta; RP, right pleura
Baseline demographics characteristics between the two groups
| Variables | ICB exposed group | ICB unexposed group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (group A, | (group B, | ||
| Age(year) | 63.74 ± 8.0 | 67.94 ± 11.30 | 0.135 |
| Sex | 0.443 | ||
| Male | 27(87.1) | 14(77.8) | |
| Female | 4(12.9) | 4(22.2) | |
| BMI(Kg/m2) | 22.60 ± 3.22 | 21.51 ± 3.64 | 0.286 |
| ASA | 0.217 | ||
| II | 23(74.2) | 10(55.6) | |
| III | 8(25.8) | 8(44.6) | |
| T stage | 0.069 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 2(11.1) | |
| 3 | 18(58.1) | 6(33.3) | |
| 4 | 13(41.9) | 10(55.6) | |
| N stage | 0.131 | ||
| 0 | 3(9.7) | 7(38.9) | |
| 1 | 9(29.0) | 3(16.7) | |
| 2 | 10(32.3) | 4(22.2) | |
| 3 | 9(29.0) | 4(22.2) |
Perioperative outcomes between the group A and B
| Variables | ICB exposed group | ICB unexposed group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (group A, | (group B, | ||
| right pleura | 0.0001 | ||
| unruptured | 27 (87.1) | 4 (22.2) | |
| rupture | 4 (12.9) | 14 (77.8) | |
| time of lower mediastinal LNs dissection (min) | 40.94 ± 9.69 | 38.28 ± 10.40 | 0.372 |
| number of lower mediastinal LNs dissection | 4.0(3.0 ~ 8.0) | 5.0(3.0 ~ 6.0) | 0.889 |
| extubation time of endotracheal intubation (min) | 10.0(6.0 ~ 12.0) | 13.0(8.0 ~ 15.0) | 0.003 |
| thoracic drainage tube stay (days) | 6.0(5.0 ~ 7.0) | 8.0(6.0 ~ 10.5) | 0.041 |
| postoperative hospital stay(days) | |||
| Median (P25 ~ P75) | 9.0 (8.0 ~ 12.0) | 9.0(8.0 ~ 13.0) | 0.983 |
| Mean ± SD | 10.97 ± 3.87 | 14.67 ± 15.56 | 0.335 |
| drainage volume of thorax(mL) | 340(280 ~ 400) | 430(243.8 ~ 550) | 0.295 |
| Postoperative complications | 0.074 | ||
| pancreatic fistula | 1 | 0 | |
| pleural effusion | 0 | 2 | |
| anastomotic leakage | 0 | 1 |
Perioperative outcomes between unruptured and rupture group
| Variables | unruptured group ( | rupture group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| extubation time of endotracheal intubation (min) | 6.0 (8.0 ~ 10.0) | 13.0 (9.5 ~ 15.5) | 0.004 |
| Thoracic drainage tube stay (days) | 6.0 (5.0 ~ 7.0) | 8.0 (6.0 ~ 10.5) | 0.028 |
| drainage volume of thorax (mL) | 340 (275 ~ 380) | 450 (272.5 ~ 512.5) | 0.198 |
| postoperative hospital stay (days) | 10.0 (9.0 ~ 12.0) | 10.5 (8.0 ~ 12.3) | 0.842 |