Literature DB >> 26804821

The effect of early mobilization protocols on postoperative outcomes following abdominal and thoracic surgery: A systematic review.

Tanya Castelino1, Julio F Fiore1, Petru Niculiseanu1, Tara Landry2, Berson Augustin3, Liane S Feldman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization is considered an important element of postoperative care; however, how best to implement this intervention in clinical practice is unknown. This systematic review summarizes the evidence regarding the impact of specific early mobilization protocols on postoperative outcomes after abdominal and thoracic surgery.
METHOD: The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched 8 electronic databases to identify studies comparing patients receiving a specific protocol of early mobilization to a control group. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Downs and Black tool.
RESULTS: Four studies in abdominal surgery (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 1 observational prospective study) and 4 studies in thoracic surgery (3 RCTs and 1 observational retrospective study) were identified. None of the 5 studies evaluating postoperative complications reported differences between groups. One of 4 studies evaluating duration of stay reported a significant decrease in the intervention group. One of 3 studies evaluating gastrointestinal function reported differences in favor of the intervention group. One of 4 studies evaluating performance-based outcomes reported differences in favor of the intervention group. One of 5 studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes reported differences in favor of the intervention group. Overall methodologic quality was poor.
CONCLUSION: Few comparative studies have evaluated the impact of early mobilization protocols on outcomes after abdominal and thoracic surgery. The quality of these studies was poor and results were conflicting. Although bed rest is harmful, there is little available evidence to guide clinicians in effective early mobilization protocols that increase mobilization and improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26804821     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  30 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Physical performance following acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Line Rokkedal Jønsson; Lina Holm Ingelsrud; Line Toft Tengberg; Thomas Bandholm; Nicolai Bang Foss; Morten Tange Kristensen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Sara Nobile; Stefano Partelli; Luca Cardinali; Stefano Crippa; Gianpaolo Balzano; Luigi Beretta; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Pneumonia prevention in the elderly patients: the other sides.

Authors:  Najla Chebib; Clémence Cuvelier; Astrid Malézieux-Picard; Thibault Parent; Xavier Roux; Thomas Fassier; Frauke Müller; Virginie Prendki
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Devising the guidelines: the techniques of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery-postoperative management and enhanced recovery after surgery.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Feasibility of real-time location systems in monitoring recovery after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Robert D Dorrell; Sarah A Vermillion; Clancy J Clark
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Olivia Hershorn; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Barry L Stein; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A pilot study: The association between physical activity level using by accelerometer and postoperative complications after hepatic resection.

Authors:  Hiroya Iida; Tomoharu Shimizu; Hiromitsu Maehira; Naomi Kitamura; Haruki Mori; Toru Miyake; Sachiko Kaida; Masaji Tani
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  ERAS, length of stay and private insurance: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Diana A Celio; Roberto Poggi; Mike Schmalzbauer; Raffaele Rosso; Pietro Majno; Dimitri Christoforidis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Use of Activity Tracking in Major Visceral Surgery-the Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization Trial: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Steffen Wolk; Sebastian Linke; Andreas Bogner; Dorothée Sturm; Theresa Meißner; Benjamin Müssle; Nuh N Rahbari; Marius Distler; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.