Literature DB >> 36028700

A review of HTM 01-05 through an environmentally sustainable lens.

Brett Duane1, Paul Ashley2, Darshini Ramasubbu3, Amarantha Fennell-Wells4, Brian Maloney3, Taylor McKerlie3, John Crotty3, Mark Johnstone5, Sheryl Wilmott6.   

Abstract

Patients deserve to be treated in a safe and clean environment with consistent standards of care every time they receive treatment. It is essential that the risk of person-to-person transmission of infections be minimised, yet it is also essential that planetary harm (and therefore public harm) is minimised with respect to resource consumption, air pollution, environmental degradation etc.In 2013, the Department of Health introduced the Health Technical Memorandum (HTM) 01-05 providing dental practices with advice on patient safety when decontaminating reusable instruments in primary care. This paper provides a commentary on HTM 01-05 and similar decontamination guidance. We believe all decontamination documents needs to reflect the so-called 'triple bottom line' - the finance, social cost and impact on the planet.The authors provide an environmental commentary on a number of items mentioned in decontamination documents, including autoclaves (including the use of helix tests), disposable paper towels, undertaking hand hygiene, using a log book, plastic bag use, the use of personal protective equipment, remote decontamination units, single use instruments, single use wipes, disinfection chemicals (for example, sodium hypochlorite) thermal disinfection and wrapping of instruments.It is hoped, in the spirit of the ever-increasing numbers of papers published to highlight how healthcare (and dentistry) could become more sustainable, that these critiques will be taken in the spirit of providing a beginning of further discussion from an environmental perspective.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36028700      PMCID: PMC9412769          DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-4903-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   2.727


  33 in total

1.  Evaluation of bacterial contaminants found on unused paper towels and possible postcontamination after handwashing: a pilot study.

Authors:  Louis McCusky Gendron; Luc Trudel; Sylvain Moineau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Sharps injury reduction using a sharps container with enhanced engineering: a 28 hospital nonrandomized intervention and cohort study.

Authors:  Terry Grimmond; Suzann Bylund; Candace Anglea; Lou Beeke; Angela Callahan; Erik Christiansen; Kelly Flewelling; Kathleen McIntosh; Kay Richter; Monica Vitale
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  What's in a bin: A case study of dental clinical waste composition and potential greenhouse gas emission savings.

Authors:  J Richardson; J Grose; S Manzi; I Mills; D R Moles; R Mukonoweshuro; M Nasser; A Nichols
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of new and reprocessed microfiber cleaning cloth compared with other commonly used cleaning cloths in the hospital.

Authors:  Magda Diab-Elschahawi; Ojan Assadian; Alexander Blacky; Maria Stadler; Elisabeth Pernicka; Jutta Berger; Helene Resch; Walter Koller
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin.

Authors:  R Mutters; S L Warnes
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Microbial contamination of hospital reusable cleaning towels.

Authors:  Laura Y Sifuentes; Charles P Gerba; Ilona Weart; Kathleen Engelbrecht; David W Koenig
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Jodi D Sherman; Lewis A Raibley; Matthew J Eckelman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Patient notification exercise following a dentist's admission of the periodic use of unsterilized equipment.

Authors:  K M Roy; S Ahmed; S O Cameron; L Shaw; D Yirrell; D Goldberg
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Comparing the environmental impact of reusable and disposable dental examination kits: a life cycle assessment approach.

Authors:  David Byrne; Sophie Saget; Alexandra Davidson; Hassaan Haneef; Toka Abdeldaim; Aisha Almudahkah; Niamh Basquille; Ann Marie Bergin; John Prida; Alexandra Lyne; Brett Duane
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.727

10.  Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison.

Authors:  Meredith McQuerry; Elizabeth Easter; Alex Cao
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.