Literature DB >> 30537524

The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin.

R Mutters1, S L Warnes2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Widespread antibiotic resistance has led to fears that we are entering a post-antibiotic era and the relatively simple premise of hand washing to reduce transfer of bacteria and viruses has never been more important. Much of the emphasis has been on hand-washing technique, type of soap, and maintaining compliance but effective drying of the hands is just as important. AIM: To compare the efficacy of drying washed hands with a jet air dryer or paper towels to remove transient bacterial contamination and to determine the effect on residential flora.
METHODS: Eighty volunteers were recruited. The entire surfaces of volunteers' hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli before being washed and dried; then bacteria remaining on the skin were recovered and enumerated. In the second part of the study the number and types of bacteria comprising the natural flora remaining on washed and dried hands were determined.
FINDINGS: Significantly fewer transient and residential bacteria remained on the skin if hands were dried with a jet air dryer (P < 0.001). Drying hands with paper towels increased the number of resident bacteria, including potentially pathogenic species, released from the volunteers' skin, compared to a jet air dryer.
CONCLUSION: The number and types of bacteria remaining on washed hands were affected by the drying method. Hands dried with a jet air dryer harboured fewer viable bacteria, reducing the risk of infection transmission via touch. This could be especially important for healthcare workers who are constantly in contact with large numbers of vulnerable patients.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand drying; Hand hygiene; Jet air dryer; Resident bacterial flora; Transient bacterial flora

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30537524     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of HTM 01-05 through an environmentally sustainable lens.

Authors:  Brett Duane; Paul Ashley; Darshini Ramasubbu; Amarantha Fennell-Wells; Brian Maloney; Taylor McKerlie; John Crotty; Mark Johnstone; Sheryl Wilmott
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.727

2.  Microbiological evaluation of different hand drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands.

Authors:  Lorna K P Suen; Vanessa Y T Lung; Maureen V Boost; Cypher H Au-Yeung; Gilman K H Siu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Washing our hands of the problem.

Authors:  C Lynch; N Mahida; B Oppenheim; J Gray
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Aerosols and Bacteria From Hand Washing and Drying in Indoor Air.

Authors:  Maria Salomé Gião; Sotiris Vardoulakis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 5.  Comparison of electric hand dryers and paper towels for hand hygiene: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  K A Reynolds; J D Sexton; A Norman; D J McClelland
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Modelling disease transmission from touchscreen user interfaces.

Authors:  Andrew Di Battista; Christos Nicolaides; Orestis Georgiou
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  A quantitative microbial risk assessment for touchscreen user interfaces using an asymmetric transfer gradient transmission mode.

Authors:  Andrew Di Battista
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.