Literature DB >> 3602377

Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure.

H E Meema, S Meema.   

Abstract

Concurrent measurements of combined cortical thickness (CCT) at the midshaft of the second metacarpal and at the proximal juxtametaphyseal radial cortex were made in 234 healthy women aged 46-80 years (group 1) and in 52 women with symptomatic osteoporosis (at least two spontaneous vertebral compressions) (group 2). When -2 standard deviations (SDs) of the mean values in young healthy women (aged 21-45 years) were used as the lower limit of normal measurements, 47% of the subjects in group 1 showed abnormalities: in 25% both bones were abnormal, in 12% the radius alone was abnormal, and in 10% the second metacarpal alone was abnormal. Because 98% of the subjects in group 2 had abnormal CCT measurements, the -2-SD limit of the younger healthy subjects appears to constitute a satisfactory "fracture threshold." Although further research and correlation are required, these simple and inexpensive measurements may be appropriate for mass screening to separate those at greater risk for development of spontaneous vertebral compressions from those at lesser risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3602377     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.164.2.3602377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Bone radiogrametry: caliper versus magnifying glass.

Authors:  H Rico; E R Hernandez
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Age-related changes in cortical bone mass: data from a German female cohort.

Authors:  V A Molina Toledo; M Jergas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine.

Authors:  T Derisquebourg; P Dubois; J P Devogelaer; E Meys; B Duquesnoy; C Nagant de Deuxchaisnes; B Delcambre; X Marchandise
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; S B Jaglal; N Kreiger; W J McIsaac; G A Darlington; J V Tu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Limited utility of clinical indices for the prediction of symptomatic fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; Nicholas A Pocock; John A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The measurement of osteoporosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E R Hernandez; F Gomez-Castresana; L F Villa; H Rico
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.980

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.