Literature DB >> 3602355

Recovery from sublethal and potentially lethal damage in an X-ray-sensitive CHO cell.

J L Schwartz, S Giovanazzi, R R Weichselbaum.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that DNA strand breaks are the molecular lesions responsible for radiation-induced lethality and that their repair is the basis for the recovery of irradiated cells from sublethal and potentially lethal damage. EM9 is a Chinese hamster ovary cell line that is hypersensitive to killing by X rays and has been reported to have a defect in the rate of rejoining of DNA single-strand breaks. To establish the importance of DNA strand-break repair in cellular recovery from sublethal and potentially lethal X-ray damage, those two parameters, recovery from sublethal and potentially lethal damage, were studied in EM9 cells as well as in EM9's parental repair-proficient strain, AA8. As previously reported, EM9 is the more radiosensitive cell line, having a D0 of 0.98 Gy compared to a D0 of 1.56 Gy for AA8 cells. DNA alkaline elution studies suggest that EM9 cells repair DNA single-strand breaks at a slower rate than AA8 cells. Neutral elution analysis suggests that EM9 cells also repair DNA double-strand breaks more slowly than AA8 cells. All of these data are consistent with the hypothesis that DNA strand-break ligation is defective in EM9 cells and that this defect accounts for increased radiosensitivity. The kinetics and magnitude of recovery from sublethal and potentially lethal damage, however, were similar for both EM9 and AA8 cells. Six-hour recovery ratios for sublethal damage repair were found to be 2.47 for AA8 cells and 1.31 for EM9 cells. Twenty-four-hour recovery ratios for potentially lethal damage repair were 3.2 for AA8 and 3.3 for EM9 cells. Both measurements were made at approximately equitoxic doses. Thus, the defect in EM9 cells that confers radiosensitivity and affects DNA strand-break rejoining does not affect sublethal damage repair or potentially lethal damage repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3602355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  4 in total

1.  XRCC1 and base excision repair balance in response to nitric oxide.

Authors:  James T Mutamba; David Svilar; Somsak Prasongtanakij; Xiao-Hong Wang; Ying-Chih Lin; Peter C Dedon; Robert W Sobol; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-29

Review 2.  Coordination of DNA single strand break repair.

Authors:  Rachel Abbotts; David M Wilson
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein causes a delay in repair of DNA damage.

Authors:  Jung Wook Park; Kwangok P Nickel; Alexandra D Torres; Denis Lee; Paul F Lambert; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Modeling the biological response of normal human cells, including repair processes, to fractionated carbon beam irradiation.

Authors:  Mami Wada; Masao Suzuki; Cuihua Liu; Yumiko Kaneko; Shigekazu Fukuda; Koichi Ando; Naruhiro Matsufuji
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.724

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.