| Literature DB >> 36017901 |
Christine M Tallon1, Jack S Talbot2, Kurt J Smith3, Nia Lewis1, Daniela Nowak-Flück1, Mike Stembridge2, Philip Ainslie1, Ali M McManus1.
Abstract
Intracranial blood velocity reactivity to a steady-state hypercapnic stimulus has been shown to be similar in children and adults, but the onset response to hypercapnia is slower in the child. Given the vasodilatory effect of hypercapnia on the cerebrovasculature, assessment of vessel diameter, and blood flow are vital to fully elucidate whether the temporal hypercapnic response differs in children versus adults. Assessment of internal carotid artery (ICA) vessel diameter (ICAd), blood velocity (ICAv), volumetric blood flow (QICA ), and shear rate (ICASR ) in response to a 4 min hypercapnic challenge was completed in children (n = 14, 8 girls; 9.8 ± 0.7 years) and adults (n = 17, 7 females; 24.7 ± 1.8 years). The dynamic onset responses of partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PET CO2 ), QICA , ICAv, and ICASR to hypercapnia were modeled, and mean response time (MRT) was computed. Following 4 min of hypercapnia, ICA reactivity and ICAd were comparable between the groups. Despite a similar MRT in PET CO2 in children and adults, children had slower QICA (children 108 ± 60 s vs. adults 66 ± 37 s; p = 0.023), ICAv (children 120 ± 52 s vs. adults 52 ± 31 s; p = 0.001), and ICASR (children 90 ± 27 s vs. adults 47 ± 36 s; p = 0.001) MRTs compared with adults. This is the first study to show slower hypercapnic hyperemic kinetic responses of the ICA in children. The mechanisms determining these differences and the need to consider the duration of hypercapnic exposure when assessing CVR in children should be considered in future studies.Entities:
Keywords: adults; cerebrovascular reactivity; children; hypercapnia; internal carotid artery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36017901 PMCID: PMC9413871 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Baseline and hypercapnic cardiovascular, respiratory, and vascular responses in children and adults.
| Parameter | Time | Children ( | Adults ( | ANOVA main effects and interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age ( | Time ( | Age × Time ( | ||||
| HR (beats min−1) | BL | 76 ± 7 | 66 ± 14 |
|
|
|
| Hypercapnia | 90 ± 8 | 70 ± 12 | ||||
|
| 14 ± 6 | 5 ± 5 | ||||
| MAP (mmHg) | BL | 75 ± 9 | 85 ± 11 |
|
| 0.738 |
| Hypercapnia | 82 ± 11 | 91 ± 12 | ||||
|
| 7 ± 7 | 6 ± 6 | ||||
| PETCO2 (mmHg) | BL | 36.8 ± 2.3 | 39.3 ± 2.4 |
|
| 0.172 |
| Hypercapnia | 46.2 ± 2.0 | 49.8 ± 2.1 | ||||
|
| 9.4 ± 2.3 | 10.4 ± 1.8 | ||||
| PETO2 (mmHg) | BL | 98.1 ± 4.6 | 95.0 ± 5.4 |
|
| 0.112 |
| Hypercapnia | 133.3 ± 4.2 | 126.7 ± 4.3 | ||||
|
| 35.1 ± 5.1 | 31.7 ± 6.3 | ||||
|
| BL | 253.8 ± 55.1 | 210.0 ± 41.7 |
|
| 0.535 |
| Hypercapnia | 385.7 ± 65.9 | 327.6 ± 63.2 | ||||
|
| 131.9 ± 44.3 | 117.6 ± 48.4 | ||||
| ICAv (cm s−1) | BL | 59.7 ± 5.3 | 44.8 ± 8.5 |
|
| 0.142 |
| Hypercapnia | 87.0 ± 9.4 | 67.0 ± 14.7 | ||||
|
| 27.3 ± 8.0 | 22.1 ± 10.0 | ||||
| ICAd (mm) | BL | 4.99 ± 0.43 | 5.15 ± 0.52 | 0.298 |
| 0.535 |
| Hypercapnia | 5.09 ± 0.43 | 5.29 ± 0.52 | ||||
|
| 0.10 ± 0.14 | 0.14 ± 0.17 | ||||
| ICASR (s−1) | BL | 481.0 ± 61.3 | 353.9 ± 85.4 |
|
| 0.144 |
| Hypercapnia | 690.0 ± 106.5 | 515.5 ± 139.7 | ||||
|
| 209.0 ± 72.2 | 161.7 ± 79.6 | ||||
| CVC (mL min−1 mmHg−1) | BL | 3.44 ± 0.93 | 2.51 ± 0.59 |
|
| 0.352 |
| Hypercapnia | 4.68 ± 0.85 | 3.62 ± 0.69 | ||||
|
| 1.24 ± 0.42 | 1.11 ± 0.38 | ||||
Note: Values are mean ± SD. Bold text indicates p < 0.05.
Abbreviations: , absolute change between baseline and final 30 s of hypercapnia; BL, baseline; CVC, internal carotid artery vascular conductance; HR, heart rate; ICAd, internal carotid artery diameter; ICASR, internal carotid artery shear rate; ICAv, internal carotid artery velocity; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PETCO2, partial pressure of end‐tidal carbon dioxide; PETO2, partial pressure of end‐tidal oxygen; Q ICA, internal carotid artery blood flow.
A significant difference between children and adults, p < 0.05.
FIGURE 1Relative and absolute cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) of the internal carotid artery to hypercapnia by age. (a) Absolute CVR (CVRAbs) in children and adults. (b) Relative CVR (CVRRel) in children and adults.
FIGURE 2The response to hypercapnia of a representative adult and child subject. The continuous black and gray lines represent the mono‐exponential function in children and adults, respectively. The dark gray shaded area from −60 to 0 s signifies baseline; time = 0 signifies the onset of the hypercapnic stimulus.
End‐tidal carbon dioxide and internal carotid artery response kinetics to hypercapnia in children and adults.
| Parameter | Children | Adults | ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | Age ( | ||
| PETCO2 |
| 10.5 ± 1.9 | 10.2 ± 1.5 | 0.555 |
|
| 28.5 ± 13.5 | 29.8 ± 15.9 | 0.818 | |
|
|
| 143.0 ± 70.2 | 120.5 ± 52.2 | 0.313 |
|
| 94.7 ± 56.7 | 59.3 ± 37.4 |
| |
| ICAv |
| 29.4 ± 7.8 | 21.9 ± 9.5 |
|
|
| 101.9 ± 57.1 | 45.4 ± 29.7 |
| |
| ICASR |
| 205.3 ± 72.6 | 163.9 ± 81.3 | 0.149 |
|
| 70.4 ± 21.5 | 40.7 ± 34.1 |
|
Note: Values are mean ± SD. Bold text indicates p < 0.05.
Abbreviations: A, the change in amplitude from baseline to asymptote; ICASR, internal carotid artery shear rate; ICAv, internal carotid artery velocity; PETCO2, partial pressure of end‐tidal carbon dioxide; Q ICA, internal carotid artery blood flow; , the time constant of the response.
FIGURE 3Mean response time to hypercapnia in children and adults. Symbols represent individual data. Horizontal lines are mean values. *Significant difference between children and adults, p < 0.05.