| Literature DB >> 36016880 |
Libor Svoboda1, Jan Sperrhake2, Maria Nisser1, Chen Zhang3, Gunter Notni3,4, Hans Proquitté1.
Abstract
Newborns and preterm infants require accurate and continuous monitoring of their vital parameters. Contact-based methods of monitoring have several disadvantages, thus, contactless systems have increasingly attracted the neonatal communities' attention. Camera-based photoplethysmography is an emerging method of contactless heart rate monitoring. We conducted a pilot study in 42 healthy newborn and near-term preterm infants for assessing the feasibility and accuracy of a multimodal 3D camera system on heart rates (HR) in beats per min (bpm) compared to conventional pulse oximetry. Simultaneously, we compared the accuracy of 2D and 3D vision on HR measurements. The mean difference in HR between pulse oximetry and 2D-technique added up to + 3.0 bpm [CI-3.7 - 9.7; p = 0.359, limits of agreement (LOA) ± 36.6]. In contrast, 3D-technique represented a mean difference in HR of + 8.6 bpm (CI 2.0-14.9; p = 0.010, LOA ± 44.7) compared to pulse oximetry HR. Both, intra- and interindividual variance of patient characteristics could be eliminated as a source for the results and the measuring accuracy achieved. Additionally, we proved the feasibility of this emerging method. Camera-based photoplethysmography seems to be a promising approach for HR measurement of newborns with adequate precision; however, further research is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: 3D; camera-based photoplethysmography; contactless monitoring; heart rate; neonatology; newborn; vital parameters
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016880 PMCID: PMC9395962 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.897961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
Figure 1Interior of the multimodal 3D camera system with annotations for key components described in the main body of the text.
Figure 2Image of a newborn in different spectral ranges. From left to right: 950 nm (NIR), RGB (visible light, true color), and 750 nm (edge of visible light to NIR). The ROI is defined by keypoints in the RGB image and transferred unto the two others.
Figure 3Camera-based sensor at the maternity ward, fixed to standard issue clinical wall rails.
Figure 4Adapted measurement time scale based on procedural evaluated application experience.
Figure 5(A) Bland-Altman plot shows the level of agreements between the measured HR of Masimo-sensor and the camera-based sensor. The y-axis shows the difference between the two methods (bpm), x-axis shows the mean of the two methods (bpm) (2D vision). (B) Bland-Altman plot shows the level of agreements between the measured HR of Masimo-sensor and the camera-based sensor. The y-axis shows the difference between the two methods (bpm), x-axis shows the mean of the two methods (bpm) (3D vision).
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age [weeks] | 42 | 39.6 ± 1.3 |
| Age [hours] | 42 | 41.1 ± 13.6 + |
| Weight [g] | 42 | 3167.4 ± 444.8 + |
| Skin temperature [°C] | 38 | 37.3 ± 0.4 + |
| Transcutaneous bilirubin [μmol/l] | 42 | 120.5 ± 53.3 + |
| Illumination [lx] | 42 | 330.4 ± 13.9 + |
| Heart rate [bpm] | 42 | 127 (113-138) |
Data marked with + correspond to Mean ± SD. Data marked with
correspond to median (25th-75th Percentile).
Mean difference in heart rate in beats per min comparing Masimo vs. camera-based sensor.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean difference Masimo vs. camera-based sensor 2D-Vision [bpm] | 3.0 | −3.7 to 9.7 | 0.359 |
| Mean difference Masimo vs. camera-based sensor 3D-Vision [bpm] | 8.6 | 2.3 to 14.9 | 0.010 |
Effects of demographic and clinical characteristics on the accuracy of the heart rate measurements.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age [hours] | 0.2 | −0.02 | −0.7 to 1.1 | −0.8 to 0.8 | 0.664 | 0.948 |
| Gestational age [weeks] | −5.2 | −4.0 | −15.7 to 53 | −13.3 to 5.3 | 0.268 | 0.370 |
| Weight [g] | 0.01 | 0.009 | −0.03 to 0.05 | −0.02 to 0.04 | 0.508 | 0.461 |
| Skin temperature [°C] | −3.2 | 4.6 | −25.9 to 19.6 | −26.4 to 36.6 | 0.745 | 0.757 |
| Transcutaneous bilirubin [μmol/l] | −0.05 | −0.06 | −0.2 to 0.1 | −0.4 to 0.2 | 0.453 | 0.667 |
| Illumination [lx] | −0.4 | −0.03 | −1.2 to 0.3 | −0.8 to 0.7 | 0.177 | 0.926 |
| Male vs. female | −14.6 | −10.3 | −34.9 to 5.8 | −29.0 to 8.4 | 0.128 | 0.255 |
Figure 6(A–F) Representative measurement results comparing 2D and 3D vision (left and right column). Each plot shows the measured or calculated HR in bpm (beats per minute) of a newborn. The data encompasses the concatenated time intervals of all measurements performed on the respective patient. Here, each HR-value corresponds to an average over 2s. Blue circles denote HR values resulting from the reference Masimo pulse oximeter. Teal-colored circles and lines denote HR values resulting from the camera sensor. Whereas the teal circles show data points without a reference (i.e., the Masimo device failed to produce data), error bars show how much the camera-based data deviated from the HR measured by the Masimo device.