| Literature DB >> 36016000 |
Hsien-Shun Liao1, Ya-Kang Huang1, Jian-Yuan Syu-Gu1, En-Te Hwu2.
Abstract
An astigmatic optical profilometer with a commercial optical pickup head provides benefits, such as high resolution, compact size, and low cost. To eliminate artifacts caused by complex materials with different reflectances, a z-axis modulation mode is proposed to obtain quantitative surface morphology by measuring S curves on all image pixels. Moreover, the slope of the linear region in the S curve shows a positive relationship with the surface reflectance. However, the slope was calculated using an offline curve fitting method, which did not allow real-time reflectance imaging. Furthermore, quantitative reflectance data were unavailable because of the lack of calibration. In this study, we propose a novel method for real-time reflectance imaging by measuring the amplitude of a focus error signal (FES). The calibration results displayed a linear relationship between the FES amplitude and reflectance. The reflectance image of a grating sample with chrome patterns on a glass substrate demonstrates accurate reflectance measurements with a micrometer spatial resolution.Entities:
Keywords: astigmatism; optical profilometer; reflectance
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016000 PMCID: PMC9414481 DOI: 10.3390/s22166242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1(a) Optical configuration for the reflectance measurement. (b) FES vs. sample z-axis displacement curves with different surface reflectances. (c) objective lens z-axis displacement vs. time curve. (d) FES vs. time curves with different surface reflectances.
Figure 2System configuration of an astigmatic optical profilometer for real-time reflectance imaging.
Experimental results on the twelve optical filters with different reflectances.
| Product Number | Reflectance (%) | Slope (V/μm) | Amplitude Signal (V) | FES Amplitude (V) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A3380020-4 | 7.995 | 0.0433 | 0.172 | 0.0241 |
| A3380020-1 | 11.455 | 0.0847 | 0.345 | 0.0483 |
| A3380020-2 | 18.714 | 0.1667 | 0.674 | 0.0944 |
| A3380018-5 | 24.403 | 0.1751 | 0.805 | 0.1127 |
| A3380020-5 | 37.510 | 0.3411 | 1.339 | 0.1875 |
| A3380020-3 | 49.478 | 0.4735 | 1.836 | 0.2570 |
| A3380018-010 | 50.873 | 0.4852 | 1.901 | 0.2661 |
| A3380018-011 | 62.771 | 0.5738 | 2.256 | 0.3158 |
| A3380018-3 | 72.776 | 0.6538 | 2.753 | 0.3854 |
| A3380018-7 | 88.695 | 0.7861 | 3.323 | 0.4652 |
| A3380018-8 | 91.922 | 0.8089 | 3.422 | 0.4791 |
| A3380021-4 | 97.716 | 0.9578 | 3.740 | 0.5228 |
Figure 3(a) FES vs. Z-axis displacement curves and (b) relationship between the slope of linear region and reflectance for optical filters with varying reflectances.
Figure 4(a) FES vs. time and (b) relationship between the amplitude signal and reflectance for optical filters with different reflectances.
Figure 5Real-time reflectance image on the grating R2L2S1N1.