| Literature DB >> 36015667 |
Lisa Efriani Puluhulawa1, I Made Joni2,3, Khaled M Elamin4, Ahmed Fouad Abdelwahab Mohammed5, Muchtaridi Muchtaridi6, Nasrul Wathoni1.
Abstract
Cancer is the most common cause of death worldwide; therefore, there is a need to discover novel treatment modalities to combat it. One of the cancer treatments is nanoparticle technology. Currently, nanoparticles have been modified to have desirable pharmacological effects by using chemical ligands that bind with their specific receptors on the surface of malignant cells. Chemical grafting of chitosan nanoparticles with hyaluronic acid as a targeted ligand can become an attractive alternative for active targeting. Hence, these nanoparticles can control drug release with pH- responsive stimuli, and high selectivity of hyaluronic acid to CD44 receptors makes these nanoparticles accumulate more inside cells that overexpress these receptors (cancer cells). In this context, we discuss the benefits and recent findings of developing and utilizing chitosan-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles against distinct forms of cancer malignancy. From here we know that chitosan-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles (CHA-Np) can produce a nanoparticle system with good characteristics, effectiveness, and a good active targeting on various types of cancer cells. Therefore, this system is a good candidate for targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy, anticipating that CHA-Np could be further developed for various cancer therapy applications.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; chitosan; hyaluronic acid; nanoparticle; targeted delivery
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015667 PMCID: PMC9416118 DOI: 10.3390/polym14163410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Formation of an electrostatic complex between the negative charge of hyaluronic acid and the positive charge of chitosan and the pH-responsive behavior.
Figure 2Number of total articles used by year.
Figure 3Flowchart of the methodology.
Chitosan–hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for cancer therapy.
| No | Cancer Types | NDDS | Particle Size (nm) | Zeta Potential (mV) | Cell Line | Testing | Activities | Activities | Ref. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITG | Ap | CU | TV | S | ||||||||
| 1. | Breast cancer | miR-34a, Dox, C, HA | 214 | −33 | MDA-MB-231 | In vitro | √ | √ | - | - | - | [ |
| 2. | Cisplatin, Dox, C, HA | 160 | −28 | MCF-7 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 3. | DTX, C, HA | 170–210 | 18–24 | MCF-7 and 4T1 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 4. | Methyltestosterone, lipoic acid, C, HA | 280 | 19 | MCF-7 | In vitro | √ | √ | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 5. | Letrozole, C, HA, PLGA | 464 | −10.5 | MCF-7 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | [ | |
| 6. | Methotrexate, C, HA | 190–300 | −20–(−30) | MCF-7 | In vitro | √ | - | - | - | - | [ | |
| 7. | Bismuth, oleic acid, C, HA | 10–20 | −30.9 | MCF-7 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | - | √ | - | [ | |
| 8. | Pacitaxel, di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate, C, HA | 190 | - | MDA-MB-231 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | [ | |
| 9. | Dox, TPP, C, HA | 220–280 | - | MCF-7 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | - | √ | - | [ | |
| 10. | 3-fluoro-4-carboxyphenylboronic acid, PEG, C, HA | 200–330 | −10.8 | MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 11. | PEG, C, HA, hexadecano, Gamboic acid | 220 | 45 | MDA-MB-231 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 12. | Tamoxifen, resveratrol, poloxamer, C, HA. | 217 | 17.5 | MCF-7 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | - | √ | √ | [ | |
| 13. | Lung cancer | Cyaine3 labeled siRNA, C, HA | 127 | 31 | A549 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | √ | √ | √ | [ |
| 14. | 5-Fluorouracil, C, HA | 119 | 15.6 | A549 | In vitro | √ | √ | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 15. | Dox, Celocoxib, C, HA | 150 | −25 | A549 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | [ | |
| 16. | Raloxifen, C, HA | 142 | −15 | A549 | In vitro | √ | √ | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 17. | Peptide CM11, C, HA | 140–240 | 51 | A549 | In vitro | √ | √ | - | - | - | [ | |
| 18. | Naringenin, PCL, C, HA | 251 | −19.5 | A549 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | √ | √ | - | [ | |
| 19. | Gamboic acid, C, HA | 212 | −23 | A549 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | [ | |
| 20. | Liver cancer | Paclitaxel, C, HA | 100 | −11 | HepG2 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ |
| 21. | pDNA, C, HA | 203–390 | −37 | Huh7 | In vitro | √ | - | - | - | - | [ | |
| 22. | Colon cancer | mRNA, C, HA | 265–350 | −40 | HCT-116 | In vitro | √ | - | - | - | - | [ |
| 23. | 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin, PEG, C, HA | 227 | - | HCT-116 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | √ | √ | - | [ | |
| 24. | siRNA, TAT peptide, C, HA | 118 | 20 | CT26 | In vitro | √ | √ | - | - | - | [ | |
| 25. | anti-IL-6, BV6, PEG, C, HA | 100 | 12 | CT26 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | √ | √ | √ | - | [ | |
| 26. | siRNA, carboxylate grapheme oxide, trimethyl C, HA | 95 | 27.2 | CT26 | In vitro | √ | √ | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 27. | Oral squamous cancer | Paclitaxel, PCL, C, HA | 257 | −25 | EC109 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | √ | √ | √ | [ |
| 28. | Cathecol, C, HA | 160 | −12.7 | HN22 | In vitro | √ | √ | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 29. | Bladder cancer | siRNA, C, HA | 100–120 | 30–40 | T24 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ |
| 30. | siRNA, Dox, TAT peptide, C, HA | 118 | 9 | T24 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | √ | √ | - | [ | |
| 31. | siRNA and the EP4 antagonist, C, HA | 130 | 27 | T24 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 32. | Others | Irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, PLGA, C, HA | 153 | −13.7 | MGC803 | In vitro and in vivo | √ | - | √ | √ | - | [ |
| 33. | Nitric oxide, C, HA | 170 | 15 | PC-3 | In vitro | √ | - | - | - | - | [ | |
| 34. | Graphene oxide, fluorescein isothiocyanate, C, HA | 200 | −41 | HeLa | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 35. | Curcuminoid, C, HA | 210–240 | 25 | C6 | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
| 36. | Dox, nitric oxide, C, HA | 170–200 | −39–(−47) | HeLa | In vitro | √ | - | √ | - | - | [ | |
Abbreviations: NDDS: nanoparticle drug delivery system; Rs: In vitro release; ITG: inhibition tumor growth; Ap: induce apoptosis; CU: increase cellular uptake; TV: decrease tumor volume; S: increase selectivity; Dox: doxorubicin; DTX: docetaxel; PCL: polycaprolactone; PLGA: poly lactic co glycolic acid; C: chitosan; HA: hyaluronic acid.
Figure 4Internalization of CHA-Np in cancer cells by the CD44 receptor.
Figure 5IC50 of CHA-Np in various cancer cells. (A) Raloxifen loaded in CHA-Np, (B) Methyltestosterone loaded in CHA-Np.