Literature DB >> 28597662

Chitosan/Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles: Rational Design Revisited for RNA Delivery.

Enrique Lallana1, Julio M Rios de la Rosa1, Annalisa Tirella1, Maria Pelliccia1, Arianna Gennari1, Ian J Stratford1, Sanyogitta Puri2, Marianne Ashford2, Nicola Tirelli1.   

Abstract

Chitosan/hyaluronic acid (HA) nanoparticles can be used to deliver an RNA/DNA cargo to cells overexpressing HA receptors such as CD44. For these systems, unequivocal links have not been established yet between chitosan macromolecular (molecular weight; degree of deacetylation, i.e., charge density) and nanoparticle variables (complexation strength, i.e., stability; nucleic acid protection; internalization rate) on one hand, and transfection efficiency on the other hand. Here, we have focused on the role of avidity on transfection efficiency in the CD44-expressing HCT-116 as a cellular model; we have employed two differently sized payloads (a large luciferase-encoding mRNA and a much smaller anti-Luc siRNA), and a small library of chitosans (variable molecular weight and degree of deactylation). The RNA avidity for chitosan showed-as expected-an inverse relationship: higher avidity-higher polyplex stability-lower transfection efficiency. The avidity of chitosan for RNA appears to lead to opposite effects: higher avidity-higher polyplex stability but also higher transfection efficiency. Surprisingly, the best transfecting particles were those with the lowest propensity for RNA release, although this might be a misleading relationship: for example, the same macromolecular parameters that increase avidity can also boost chitosan's endosomolytic activity, with a strong enhancement in transfection. The performance of these nonviral vectors appears therefore difficult to predict simply on the basis of carrier- or payload-related variables, and a more holistic consideration of the journey of the nanoparticle, from cell uptake to cytosolic bioavailability of payload, is needed. It is also noteworthy that the nanoparticles used in this study showed optimal performance under slightly acidic conditions (pH 6.4), which is promising for applications in a tumoral extracellular environment. It is also worth pointing out that under these conditions we have for the first time successfully delivered mRNA with chitosan/HA nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HCT-116; RNA; chitosan; gene delivery; hyaluronan; targeting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597662     DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  27 in total

1.  Topical Lyophilized Targeted Lipid Nanoparticles in the Restoration of Skin Barrier Function following Burn Wound.

Authors:  Jilong Li; Subhadip Ghatak; Mohamed S El Masry; Amitava Das; Yang Liu; Sashwati Roy; Robert J Lee; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases.

Authors:  Weiyu Zhao; Xucheng Hou; Olivia G Vick; Yizhou Dong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Nanotechnology-Assisted RNA Delivery: From Nucleic Acid Therapeutics to COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Chiara Rinoldi; Seyed Shahrooz Zargarian; Pawel Nakielski; Xiaoran Li; Anna Liguori; Francesca Petronella; Dario Presutti; Qiusheng Wang; Marco Costantini; Luciano De Sio; Chiara Gualandi; Bin Ding; Filippo Pierini
Journal:  Small Methods       Date:  2021-07-28

4.  Nucleic Acid-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticle Interactions with Model Endosomal Membranes.

Authors:  Alice Spadea; Mark Jackman; Lili Cui; Sara Pereira; M Jayne Lawrence; Richard A Campbell; Marianne Ashford
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 10.383

Review 5.  Nanoscale platforms for messenger RNA delivery.

Authors:  Bin Li; Xinfu Zhang; Yizhou Dong
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2018-05-04

Review 6.  Pursuing Intracellular Pathogens with Hyaluronan. From a 'Pro-Infection' Polymer to a Biomaterial for 'Trojan Horse' Systems.

Authors:  Elita Montanari; Chiara Di Meo; Angela Oates; Tommasina Coviello; Pietro Matricardi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Pellet coculture of osteoarthritic chondrocytes and infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cells with chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles promotes chondrogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Shu Huang; Xiongbo Song; Tao Li; Jingfang Xiao; Yemiao Chen; Xiaoyuan Gong; Weinan Zeng; Liu Yang; Cheng Chen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 6.832

8.  Binary Solutions of Hyaluronan and Lactose-Modified Chitosan: The Influence of Experimental Variables in Assembling Complex Coacervates.

Authors:  Federica Vecchies; Pasquale Sacco; Eleonora Marsich; Giuseppe Cinelli; Francesco Lopez; Ivan Donati
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Multivalent and multifunctional polysaccharide-based particles for controlled receptor recognition.

Authors:  Haohao Duan; Mark Donovan; Aude Foucher; Xavier Schultze; Sebastien Lecommandoux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Selective delivery of PLXDC1 small interfering RNA to endothelial cells for anti-angiogenesis tumor therapy using CD44-targeted chitosan nanoparticles for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ga Hee Kim; Ji Eun Won; Yeongseon Byeon; Min Gi Kim; Tae In Wi; Jae Myeong Lee; Yun-Yong Park; Jeong-Won Lee; Tae Heung Kang; In Duk Jung; Byung Cheol Shin; Hyung Jun Ahn; Young Joo Lee; Anil K Sood; Hee Dong Han; Yeong-Min Park
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.