| Literature DB >> 36015647 |
Vito Gigante1,2, Laura Aliotta1,2, Ilaria Canesi3, Marco Sandroni1, Andrea Lazzeri1,2,3, Maria-Beatrice Coltelli1,2, Patrizia Cinelli1,2,3.
Abstract
The present work aims to enhance the use of agricultural byproducts for the production of bio-composites by melt extrusion. It is well known that in the production of such bio-composites, the weak point is the filler-matrix interface, for this reason the adhesion between a polylactic acid (PLA)/poly(butylene succinate)(PBSA) blend and rice and wheat bran platelets was enhanced by a treatment method applied on the fillers using a suitable beeswax. Moreover, the coupling action of beeswax and inorganic fillers (such as talc and calcium carbonate) were investigated to improve the thermo-mechanical properties of the final composites. Through rheological (MFI), morphological (SEM), thermal (TGA, DSC), mechanical (Tensile, Impact), thermomechanical (HDT) characterizations and the application of analytical models, the optimum among the tested formulations was then selected.Entities:
Keywords: biobased waxes; mineral fillers; natural fibers
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015647 PMCID: PMC9413742 DOI: 10.3390/polym14163389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Mass composition (wt.%) of studied bio-composites.
| Acronym | PLA | PBSA | Wheat Bran (WB) | Rice Bran (RB) | Beeswax | Talc (T) | Calcium Carbonate (C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATRIX | 60 | 40 | / | / | / | / | / |
| *M_5WB | 57 | 38 | 5 | / | / | / | / |
| *M_5WB_4W | 57 | 38 | 4.8 | / | 0.2 | / | / |
| *M_5WB_8W | 57 | 38 | 4.6 | / | 0.4 | / | / |
| *M_10WB | 54 | 36 | 10 | / | / | / | / |
| *M_10WB_4W | 54 | 36 | 9.6 | / | 0.4 | / | / |
| *M_10WB_8W | 54 | 36 | 9.2 | / | 0.8 | / | / |
| *M_5RB | 57 | 38 | / | 5 | / | / | / |
| *M_5RB_4W | 57 | 38 | / | 4.8 | 0.2 | / | / |
| *M_5RB_8W | 57 | 38 | / | 4.6 | 0.4 | / | / |
| *M_10RB | 54 | 36 | / | 10 | / | / | / |
| *M_10RB_4W | 54 | 36 | / | 9.6 | 0.4 | / | / |
| *M_10RB_8W | 54 | 36 | / | 9.2 | 0.8 | / | / |
| °M_10WB_4W_15T | 45 | 30 | 9.6 | / | 0.4 | 15 | / |
| °M_10RB_4W_15T | 45 | 30 | / | 9.6 | 0.4 | 15 | / |
| °M_10WB_4W_15C | 45 | 30 | 9.6 | / | 0.4 | / | 15 |
| °M_10RB_4W_15C | 45 | 30 | / | 9.6 | 0.4 | / | 15 |
| °M_10WB_4W_30T | 36 | 24 | 9.6 | / | 0.4 | 30 | / |
| °M_10RB_4W_30T | 36 | 24 | / | 9.6 | 0.4 | 30 | / |
| °M_10WB_4W_30C | 36 | 24 | 9.6 | / | 0.4 | / | 30 |
| °M_10RB_4W_30C | 36 | 24 | / | 9.6 | 0.4 | / | 30 |
Figure 1TGA of beeswax, PLA/PBSA matrix, Wheat Bran and Rice Bran with and without different percentage of beeswax treatment.
Figure 2SEM of (a) Wheat (b) WB + 4 wt.% beeswax (c) WB + 8 wt.% beeswax (d) Rice (e) RB + 4 wt.% beeswax (f) RB + 8wt.% beeswax. Yellow arrows to highlights the wax wetting.
Figure 3(a) 2000× magnification of Wheat Bran and Rice Bran (b) diameter distribution (c) thickness distribution.
Figure 4Melt flow rate behavior for the formulations with beeswax, showing opposite trends.
Figure 5Melt flow rate behavior inserting 10 wt.% of coated fibers with different amounts of particulate mineral fillers.
Quasi-static mechanical properties and impact behavior of studied bio-composites.
| Acronym | Young’s | Stress at Break | Elongation at Break (%) | Charpy Impact Strength (kJ/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATRIX | 1.99 ± 0.12 | 21.5 ± 0.8 | 192.8 ± 56.6 | 9.2 ± 0.5 |
| *M_5WB | 1.97 ± 0.07 | 20.4 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.3 |
| *M_5WB_4W | 2.02 ± 0.02 | 21.4 ± 0.7 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.2 |
| *M_5WB_8W | 2.01 ± 0.12 | 19.3 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
| *M_10WB | 2.06 ± 0.04 | 20.0 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
| *M_10WB_4W | 2.03 ± 0.13 | 20.8 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.2 |
| *M_10WB_8W | 2.00 ± 0.08 | 20.1 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
| *M_5RB | 1.79 ± 0.13 | 19.7 ± 1.4 | 10.9 ± 2.7 | 5.0 ± 0.2 |
| *M_5RB_4W | 1.81 ± 0.06 | 20.5 ± 0.5 | 11.4 ± 1.2 | 5.6 ± 0.8 |
| *M_5RB_8W | 1.73 ± 0.02 | 19.0 ± 0.2 | 11.8 ± 2.5 | 5.0 ± 0.3 |
| *M_10RB | 1.69 ± 0.14 | 17.1 ± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.2 |
| *M_10RB_4W | 1.48 ± 0.02 | 17.9 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.6 |
| *M_10RB_8W | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 18.2 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 0.1 |
| PBS+ 50 wt. % wheat bran [ | 1.6 ± 0.09 | 13.5 ± 0.1 | 8.1 ± 0.9 | 8.9 ± 0.7 |
| PHBV + 10% wheat bran [ | 2.1 ± 0.10 | 18.9 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.2 |
| PP + 30% wheat bran [ | 2.30 ± 0.10 | 19.9 ± 0.3 | 6.2 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.2 |
Figure 6Pukanszky’s analytical model application that demonstrates the better adhesion matrix/filler with a 4% wax treatment.
Quasi-static mechanical properties and impact behavior of bio-composites with inorganic fillers.
| Acronym | Young’s Modulus (Gpa) | Stress at Break | Elongation at Break (%) | Charpy Impact Strength (kJ/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| °M_10WB_4W_15T | 2.89 ± 0.09 | 24.1 ± 1.0 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.5 |
| °M_10WB_4W_15C | 2.21 ± 0.06 | 21.5 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 4.7 ± 0.4 |
| °M_10WB_4W_30T | 4.50 ± 0.32 | 28.2 ± 1.6 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.7 |
| °M_10WB_4W_30C | 2.94 ± 0.14 | 20.6 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.8 |
| °M_10RB_4W_15T | 2.38 ± 0.17 | 20.3 ± 1.0 | 9.1 ± 0.9 | 5.2 ± 0.9 |
| °M_10RB_4W_15C | 2.02 ± 0.05 | 17.3 ± 0.7 | 11.3 ± 2.0 | 5.1 ± 1.1 |
| °M_10RB_4W_30T | 4.21 ± 0.10 | 23.2 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.8 |
| °M_10RB_4W_30C | 2.08 ± 0.09 | 18.5 ± 0.9 | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 5.1 ± 0.8 |
Figure 7HDT measurements of inorganic filled biocomposites.
Figure 8DSC analysis of mineral reinforced biocomposites.
Results of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis (first heating).
| Acronym | Tcc (°C) PLA | Tm (°C) | Tm (°C) | ΔHm (J/g) PLA | ΔHm (J/g) PBSA | ΔHcc (J/g) PLA | Xc (%) PLA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| °M_10WB_4W_15T | 92.1 | 151.4 | 83.1 | 14.7 | 8.1 | 6.0 | 22.3 |
| °M_10WB_4W_15C | 93.5 | 151.3 | 83.1 | 13.1 | 10.1 | 7.2 | 15.1 |
| °M_10WB_4W_30T | 93.1 | 150.7 | 82.8 | 10.9 | 6.4 | 1.6 |
|
| °M_10WB_4W_30C | 95.6 | 151.7 | 83.6 | 11.1 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 22.8 |
| °M_10RB_4W_15T | 92.5 | 148.7 | 83.4 | 14.1 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 21.2 |
| °M_10RB_4W_15C | 94.0 | 148.8 | 83.1 | 14.4 | 9.5 | 6.2 | 21.0 |
| °M_10RB_4W_30T | 92.5 | 151.9 | 84.0 | 10.7 | 8.3 | 1.7 |
|
| °M_10RB_4W_30C | 95.7 | 152.1 | 84.2 | 10.7 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 18.9 |
Figure 9SEM micrographs with 1000× of magnification of optimized biocomposites with WB (up) and RB (down) with 30 wt.% of talc (on the left) and 30 wt.% of calcium carbonate (on the right).