| Literature DB >> 36015549 |
Maria V Zykova1, Konstantin S Brazovskii2, Kristina A Bratishko1, Evgeny E Buyko1, Lyudmila A Logvinova1, Sergey V Romanenko1,2, Andrey I Konstantinov3, Sergei V Krivoshchekov1, Irina V Perminova3, Mikhail V Belousov1,2.
Abstract
Peat humic acids are well known for their wide range of biological effects which can be attributed to the complex chemical structure of naturally occurring humic substances. One of the promising tools is an ontology-based quantitative analysis of the relationship between physical and chemical parameters describing a chemical structure of peat humic acids and their biological activity. This article demonstrates the feasibility of such an approach to estimate the antioxidant and cell protective properties of the peat humic acids. The structural parameters of the peat humic acids were studied by electronic, fluorescence, infrared, 13C-NMR spectroscopy, titrimetric analysis, elemental C,H,N, and O- analysis, and gel chromatography. Antioxidant and antiradical activities were assessed by physicochemical methods of analysis: electronic paramagnetic resonance, cathodic voltammetry, ABTS•+ scavenging, assay of DPPH radical-scavenging activity, assay of superoxide radical-scavenging activity, iron chelating activity, and scavenging of hydroxyl radicals. Cytoprotective activity was evaluated by the neutral red-based cytotoxicity test in 3T3-L1 cell culture in a wide range of concentrations. Assessment of intracellular ROS production was carried out using a 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluoresceindiacetate (DCFDA) fluorescent probe. Intracellular ROS production was induced using two common prooxidants (tert-butyl hydroperoxide, Fe2+ ions). We suggested an ontology-based model for the antioxidant and cytoprotective activity of humic acids based on experimental data and numerical models. This model establishes the way to further research on the biological effects of humic acids and provides a useful tool for numerical simulation of these effects. Remarkable antioxidant and cell protective activity of humic acids makes them a promising natural source of new pharmaceutical substances that feature a wide range of biological effects.Entities:
Keywords: QSAR; antioxidant activity; humic acids; ontology model
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015549 PMCID: PMC9412878 DOI: 10.3390/polym14163293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Short description of the peat samples.
| Peat Type | Sample Name | Sampling Depth (cm) | Degree of Decay (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raised bog sphagnum | Peat 1 | 20–70 | 5–10 |
| Raised bog pine-cotton-grass | Peat 2 | 10–50 | 30–35 |
| Raised bog magellanicum | Peat 3 | 20–70 | 10–15 |
| Raised bog fuscum | Peat 4 | 20–70 | 5–10 |
| Low-mire woody | Peat 5 | 10–50 | 25–30 |
| Low-mire grass-moss | Peat 6 | 200–250 | 35–50 |
| Low-mire grass | Peat 7 | 230–270 | 40–45 |
| Low-mire woody peat | Peat 8 | 50–100 | 30–35 |
| Mesotrophic carex peat | Peat 9 | 150–200 | 40–45 |
Figure 1Averaged IR spectrum of the peat samples.
Antioxidant activity of the HAs, IC50 μg/mL.
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH | 5.2 | 20.8 |
| ABTS | 10.6 | 28.5 |
| Fe chelating | 26.9 | 100.0 |
| OH | 240.0 | 2590.0 |
| Superoxide | 3.9 | 38.1 |
Linear correlations between antioxidant activity and concentration of hydroxyl groups (OH).
| Parameter | r | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | −0.27 | 0.01 | 0.279 |
| ABTS | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.222 |
| Fe chelating | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.343 |
| OH | −0.14 | 0.04 | 0.588 |
| Superoxide | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.903 |
Linear correlations between antioxidant activity and concentration of carboxyl groups (COOH).
| Parameter | r | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.781 |
| ABTS | −0.20 | 0.01 | 0.451 |
| Fe chelating | −0.18 | 0.02 | 0.464 |
| OH | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.980 |
| Superoxide | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.887 |
Linear correlations between antioxidant activity and the number of paramagnetic centers.
| Parameter | r | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | −0.6 | 0.3 | 0.008 * |
| ABTS | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.768 |
| Fe chelating | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.600 |
| OH | −0.17 | 0.02 | 0.484 |
| Superoxide | −0.26 | 0.01 | 0.291 |
Variables in the Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 are: r—coefficient of linear correlation; R2—the adjusted coefficient of determination; p value—the achieved confidence level, *—statistically significant values (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Components of PARAFAC model and their loads.
Linear correlations between measured values and those predicted with the PARAFAC model antioxidant activity.
| Parameter | r | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.459 |
| ABTS | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.02 * |
| Fe chelating | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.007 * |
| OH | 0.57 | 0.24 | 0.049 * |
| Superoxide | 0.73 | 0.48 | 0.002 * |
r—coefficient of linear correlation, R2—the adjusted coefficient of determination, p value—the achieved confidence level, *—statistically significant values.
Figure 3Fluorescence of the incubated cells in presence of humic acids.
Figure 4Viability of 3T3-L1 normal fibroblast cells incubated with HAs.
Figure 5A hypothetical ontology-based model of biological activity of HAs.