| Literature DB >> 36014880 |
Zezhong Tian1,2,3, Kongyao Li1,2,3,4, Die Fan5, Xiaoli Gao6, Xilin Ma1,2,3, Yimin Zhao1,2,3, Dan Zhao1,2,3, Ying Liang1,2,3, Qiuhua Ji1,2,3, Yiting Chen1,2,3, Yan Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
Increased oxidative stress and platelet apoptotic in middle-aged and elderly adults are important risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Therefore, it is of great significance to control the oxidative stress and platelet apoptosis in middle-aged and elderly adults. Previous acute clinical trials have shown that water-soluble tomato concentrate (WSTC) from fresh tomatoes could exert antiplatelet benefits after 3 h or 7 h, but its effects on platelet apoptosis and oxidative stress are still unknown, especially in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. This current study aimed to examine the efficacies of WSTC on platelet apoptosis and oxidative stress in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults via a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial (10 weeks in total). A total of 52 healthy middle-aged and elderly adults completed this trial. The results showed that WSTC could increase the serum total antioxidant capacity levels (p < 0.05) and decrease the serum malondialdehyde levels (p < 0.05) after a 4-week WSTC supplementation in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. Platelet endogenous reactive oxygen species generation (p < 0.05), mitochondrial membrane potential dissipation (p < 0.05) and phosphatidylserine exposure (p < 0.05) were attenuated. In addition, our present study also found that WSTC could inhibit platelet aggregation and activation induced by collagen or ADP after intervention (p < 0.05), while having no effects on adverse events (p > 0.05). The results suggest that WSTC can inhibit oxidative stress and its related platelet apoptosis, which may provide a basis for the primary prevention of WSTC in ASCVD.Entities:
Keywords: crossover clinical trial; oxidative stress; platelet apoptosis; water-soluble tomato concentrate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014880 PMCID: PMC9412583 DOI: 10.3390/nu14163374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow diagram of the subject recruitment and participation procedure.
Baseline characteristics.
| N = 52 | |
|---|---|
| Age, (years) | 56.13 ± 1.01 a |
| Gender (male/female) | 16/36 |
|
| |
| Primary school | 2(3.85%) |
| Middle school | 23(44.23%) |
| College | 27(51.92%) |
|
| |
| Sales/workers/farmers | 18(34.61%) |
| Professionals/technicians | 29(55.76%) |
| Others | 5(9.62%) |
|
| |
| Weight (kg) | 64.17 ± 1.70 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.57 ± 0.46 |
| NC (cm) | 34.40 ± 1.08 |
| WC (cm) | 84.99 ± 1.59 |
| WHR | 0.88 ± 0.01 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 118.32 ± 2.19 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 77.19 ± 1.47 |
|
| |
| Current smoking | 2(3.8%) |
| Regular alcohol drinking | 11(21%) |
a The results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index, WC, waist circumference, NC, neck circumference, WHR, waist-to-hip ratio, DBP, diastolic blood pressure and SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 2Effects of WSTC supplementation on the serum TAC and MDA levels in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. (A,B) Serum TAC and MDA levels. The values are presented as the means ± SEMs. At baseline, there was no significant difference for the TAC and MDA levels between the two groups. * p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance for independent data is used for comparison between the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention. ## p < 0.01 vs. baseline in the WSTC group, assessed by a paired Student’s t-test. Abbreviations: TAC, total antioxidant capacity, MDA, malonaldehyde, WSTC, water-soluble tomato concentrate and ns, no significance.
Figure 3Effect of WSTC supplementation on ROS generation in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. Human wash platelets were prepared from volunteers before (pre) and after (post) 4 weeks of WSTC or placebo consumption. The washed platelets were pretreated with H2DCF-DA, and ROS was measured by flow cytometry. At baseline, there is no significant difference in the ROS generation between the two groups. * p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance for independent data, is used for comparison between the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention. ## p < 0.01 vs. baseline in the WSTC group, assessed by a paired Student’s t-test. Abbreviations: ROS, reactive oxygen species, WSTC, water-soluble tomato concentrate and ns, no significance.
Figure 4Effect of WSTC supplementation on ΔΨm dissipation and PS exposure in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. Human wash platelets were prepared from volunteers before (pre) and after (post) 4 weeks of WSTC or placebo consumption. (A) Platelet ΔΨm dissipation was measured using TMRM by flow cytometry. (B) Annexin V-PE was used to assess platelet PS exposure by flow cytometry. At baseline, there was no significant difference in any variable for ΔΨm dissipation and PS exposure between the two groups. * p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance for independent data was used for comparison between the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention. # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 vs. baseline in the WSTC group, assessed by a paired Student’s t-test. Abbreviations: PS, phosphatidylserine and WSTC, water-soluble tomato concentrate.
Figure 5Effects of WSTC supplementation on ΔΨm dissipation and ROS in response to thrombin. Human wash platelets were prepared from volunteers before (pre) and after (post) 4 weeks of WSTC or placebo consumption. (A) H2DCF-DA-treated platelets were incubated with thrombin (2 unit), and ROS were measured by flow cytometry. (B) The wash platelets were incubated with thrombin (2 unit), and TMRM was used to detect ΔΨm measured by flow cytometry. At baseline, there was no significant difference in any variable about ΔΨm dissipation and ROS between the two groups. * p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance for independent data was used for comparison between the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention. ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 vs. baseline in the WSTC group, assessed by a paired Student’s t-test. Abbreviations: ROS, reactive oxygen species and WSTC, water-soluble tomato concentrate.
Figure 6WSTC supplementation inhibited platelet aggregation and activation in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. Human PRP was prepared from volunteers before (pre) and after (post) 4 weeks of WSTC or placebo consumption. (A,B) Platelet aggregation was stimulated by ADP or collagen. PRP was stimulated with ADP or collagen. The platelet surface expression of (C,D) P-selectin and (E) PAC-1 was analyzed by flow cytometry. The values are presented as the means ± SEMs. At baseline, there was no significant difference for platelet aggregation and activation between the two groups. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance for independent data was used for a comparison between the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 vs. baseline in the WSTC group, assessed by a paired Student’s t-test. Abbreviations: PRP, platelet-rich plasma and WSTC, water-soluble tomato concentrate.
Blood chemistry and plasma clotting times at baseline and after the 4-week treatment b.
| Placebo ( | 150mg WSTC ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 4 Weeks | Baseline | 4 Weeks | |
|
| ||||
| ALT (U/L) | 21.08 ± 1.57 a | 21.27 ± 2.03 | 21.75 ± 1.97 | 20.55 ± 1.51 |
| Total protein (g/L) | 74.19 ± 0.50 | 73.37 ± 0.45 | 73.58 ± 0.56 | 73.16 ± 0.53 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 47.05 ± 0.32 | 45.97 ± 0.33 | 46.63 ± 0.36 | 45.55 ± 0.35 |
| Albumin/Globulin | 1.77 ± 0.04 | 1.69 ± 0.03 | 1.76 ± 0.03 | 1.68 ± 0.03 |
| Renal function | ||||
| Urea (mmol/L) | 4.86 ± 1.42 | 4.97 ± 0.15 | 5.01 ± 0.17 | 4.82 ± 0.14 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 78.35 ± 2.44 | 78.29 ± 2.30 | 79.21 ± 2.36 | 78.44 ± 2.38 |
|
| ||||
| Prothrombin time (s) | 10.81 ± 0.73 | 11.26 ± 0.81 | 10.90 ± 0.71 | 11.16 ± 0.73 |
| APTT (s) | 28.75 ± 0.24 | 28.64 ± 0.28 | 28.68 ± 0.28 | 28.48 ± 0.25 |
| Thrombin time (s) | 18.76 ± 0.09 | 18.76 ± 0.13 | 18.77 ± 0.10 | 18.91 ± 0.11 |
| Fibrinogen (g/L) | 2.98 ± 0.06 | 3.03 ± 0.08 | 3.01 ± 0.07 | 2.92 ± 0.08 |
|
| ||||
| PLT (109/L) | 244.20 ± 9.05 | 253.53 ± 9.90 | 244.12 ± 8.71 | 250.69 ± 9.27 |
| MPV (fl) | 10.20 ± 0.15 | 10.18 ± 0.13 | 10.17 ± 0.15 | 10.22 ± 0.15 |
a Mean ± SEM (all such values). b A one-way analysis of variance for independent data was used for comparison between the two groups at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention. There was no significant difference for any variable concerning the blood chemistry and plasma clotting times between the two groups at baseline and after the 4-week intervention. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase, PT-R, prothrombin time ratio, PLT, plaque level test, MPV, medial plaque volume and APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time.