| Literature DB >> 36014647 |
Mattia Costamagna1, Antonio Arques2, Vanesa G Lo-Iacono-Ferreira3, Alessandra Bianco Prevot1.
Abstract
The assessment of environmental sustainability has assumed great importance during the study and implementation of a new process, including those aimed to waste valorization and reuse. In this research, the environmental performance of the photo-Fenton processes was evaluated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. In particular, photo-Fenton conducted in mild conditions (almost neutral pH), using soluble bio-organic substances as auxiliary agents were compared with the "classic" photo-Fenton run at pH 2.8. The evaluation was carried out both, at the laboratory level and at pilot plant scale. LCA analysis shows that working in mild conditions reduces the environmental burden associated with the use of chemicals. On the other hand, the occurring drop in effectiveness significantly increases the overall impact, thus evidencing the need of considering the process as a whole.Entities:
Keywords: bio-based substances; life cycle assessment (LCA); photo-Fenton; water treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014647 PMCID: PMC9416024 DOI: 10.3390/nano12162781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
A goal and scope scheme for the two parts of the study.
| Category | Laboratory Level | Pilot Plant Level |
|---|---|---|
|
| To identify the main environmental hotspots of near neutral pH photo-Fenton process and to analyse in detail the environmental behaviour and performance of two waste derived BBS used as auxiliary agents: green compost-derived and olive oil mill waste-derived BBS. | To evaluate the effect of performing, at different pH (pH 2.8, pH 5.0), solar photo-Fenton process, using waste derived BBS as auxiliary agent. |
|
| The removal of 90% caffeine from 250 mL of Milli-Q water | Treatment of 1 m3 of water contaminated with caffeine per day. |
|
| The system was modelled considering: (i) the production of each chemical reagent (H2SO4, H2O2, etc.); (ii) the isolation process to obtain the BBS; (iii) the degradation process itself. | Cradle-to-grave approach, encompassing the construction, the use for degradation processes and the decommissioning of the treatment plant. |
|
| See | See |
Inventory data for the isolation processes of 1 kg of BBS from different sources (GC: green compost; OMW: oil mill waste).
| Input | BBS-GC | BBS-OMW |
|---|---|---|
| Transport (tkm) | 0.40 | 0.15 |
| NaOH (g) | 133 | / |
| KOH (g) | / | 617 |
| Water (kg) | 37 | 110 |
| HCl (g) | 50 | / |
| Heat (extraction) (kJ) | 6084 | 2306 |
| Electricity (filtration) (kWh) | / | 0.036 |
| Electricity (centrifugation) (kWh) | 0.9 | / |
| Heat (drying) (kJ) | 608 | 608 |
| Process output (kg) | 1 | 1 |
Inventory of the input for the treatments of 250 mL of Milli-Q water contaminated with caffeine (5 mg/L), in the presence of different complexing agents: BBS-GC and BBS-OMW.
| Input | Unit | Photo Fenton | Photo Fenton |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSO4 | mg | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| H2O2 | mg | 15 | 6.25 |
| H2SO4 | mg | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| NaOH | mg | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| BBS | mg | 2.5 | 2.43 |
| Electricity | kWh | 0.05 | 0.075 |
Figure 1A photo of the pilot plant.
Inventory data for the pilot plant.
| Input | Amount | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Stainless steel | 55 | kg |
| Aluminium | 9 | kg |
| Borosilicate glass | 5.57 | kg |
| Anodizing process | 2 | m2 |
| Polypropylene (PP) | 7 | kg |
| Pumps | 2 | items |
| Transport | 36 | tkm |
The accumulated radiation, the required surface and the corresponding number of equivalent pilot plants, necessary for caffeine degradation. (*) Even if a smaller plant would be sufficient, it was decided to keep the value of 1 pilot plant in the modeling.
| Parameter | 1 mg/L Caffeine | 50 mg/L Caffeine | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 2.8 | pH 5.0 | pH 2.8 | pH 5.0 | |
|
| 90 | 11,271 | 5713 | 16,635 |
|
| 0.058 | 7.25 | 3.67 | 10.7 |
|
| 1 * | 16.11 | 8.16 | 23.77 |
Inventory data for the use phase: the treatment of 1 m3 of contaminated water, with the 4 solar photo Fenton processes considered. Data are grouped for caffeine concentration and working pH.
| Parameter | 1 mg/L Caffeine | 50 mg/L Caffeine | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 2.8 | pH 5.0 | pH 2.8 | pH 5.0 | |
| H2SO4 (g) | 284.88 | 174.66 | 270.47 | 220.45 |
| H2O2 (g) | 100.90 | 100.90 | 100.90 | 303.03 |
| FeCl3·6H2O (g) | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 50.00 |
| NaOH (g) | 56.80 | / | 57.60 | 18.00 |
| BBS-OMW (g) | / | / | / | 30 |
| Transport of chemicals (tkm) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| N° of pilot plants equivalent normalized | 2.3 × 10−5 | 0.0037 | 0.0019 | 0.0054 |
| Electricity (kWh) | 0.44 | 7.08 | 3.59 | 10.45 |
Impact at midpoint level for the production process of 1 kg of BBS.
| Impact Category | Unit | BBS-OMW | BBS-GC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate change (CC) | kg CO2 eq | 1.498 | 1.338 |
| Ozone depletion (OD) | kg CFC11 eq | 1.75 × 10−7 | 2.84 × 10−7 |
| Human toxicity, non-cancer (HT-nc) | CTUh | 4.351 × 10−8 | 1.31 × 10−8 |
| Human toxicity, cancer (HT-c) | CTUh | 7.85 × 10−10 | 4.85 × 10−10 |
| Acidification (A) | mol H+ eq | 7.49 × 10−3 | 6.62 × 10−3 |
| Eutrophication, freshwater (FE) | kg P eq | 7.94 × 10−4 | 3.29 × 10−4 |
| Resource use, fossils (RU-f) | MJ | 24.678 | 22.361 |
| Resource use, minerals and metals (RU-mm) | kg Sb eq | 3.803 × 10−5 | 1.76 × 10−5 |
LCIA results for the photo Fenton process, at laboratory level: treatment of 250 mL of water contaminated with 5 mg/L of caffeine, at pH 5.0, using BBS-OMW as complexing agent.
| Heading | Total | FeSO4 | H2O2 | H2SO4 | NaOH | BBS-OMW | Electricity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.69 × 10−2 | 1.07 × 10−6 | 1.77 × 10−5 | 1.13 × 10−8 | 1.20 × 10−7 | 3.75 × 10−6 | 1.69 × 10−2 |
|
| 1.83 × 10−9 | 1.08 × 10−13 | 2.15 × 10−12 | 1.35 × 10−15 | 7.19 × 10−14 | 4.37 × 10−13 | 1.82 × 10−9 |
|
| 2.55 × 10−10 | 4.53 × 10−14 | 2.12 × 10−13 | 5.43 × 10−16 | 2.44 × 10−15 | 1.09 × 10−13 | 2.55 × 10−10 |
|
| 7.91 × 10−12 | 1.60 × 10−15 | 4.40 × 10−14 | 1.70 × 10−17 | 6.36 × 10−17 | 1.96 × 10−15 | 7.86 × 10−12 |
|
| 1.50 × 10−4 | 8.48 × 10−9 | 7.14 × 10−8 | 1.12 × 10−9 | 6.95 × 10−10 | 1.87 × 10−8 | 1.50 × 10−4 |
|
| 7.05 × 10−6 | 1.07 × 10−9 | 6.55 × 10−9 | 6.43 × 10−12 | 6.16 × 10−11 | 1.98 × 10−9 | 7.04 × 10−6 |
|
| 3.87 × 10−1 | 1.87 × 10−5 | 3.07 × 10−4 | 4.37 × 10−7 | 1.51 × 10−6 | 6.17 × 10−5 | 3.87 × 10−1 |
|
| 1.37 × 10−7 | 1.06 × 10−10 | 3.27 × 10−10 | 1.51 × 10−12 | 2.74 × 10−12 | 9.51 × 10−11 | 1.36 × 10−7 |
Red: high impact. Yellow-Orange: medium impact. From light green to dark green: from low to very low impact.
LCIA results for the photo Fenton process, at laboratory level: treatment of 250 mL of water contaminated with 5 mg/L of caffeine, at pH 5.0, using BBS-GC as complexing agent.
| Impact Category (and Unit) | Total | FeSO4 | H2O2 | H2SO4 | NaOH | BBS-GC | Electricity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.53 × 10−2 | 1.07 × 10−6 | 7.36 × 10−6 | 1.13 × 10−8 | 1.20 × 10−7 | 3.25 × 10−6 | 2.53 × 10−2 |
|
| 2.74 × 10−9 | 1.08 × 10−13 | 8.94 × 10−13 | 1.35 × 10−15 | 7.19 × 10−14 | 6.90 × 10−13 | 2.73 × 10−9 |
|
| 3.83 × 10−10 | 4.53 × 10−14 | 8.82 × 10−14 | 5.43 × 10−16 | 2.44 × 10−15 | 3.18 × 10−14 | 3.83 × 10−10 |
|
| 1.18 × 10−11 | 1.60 × 10−15 | 1.83 × 10−14 | 1.70 × 10−17 | 6.36 × 10−17 | 1.18 × 10−15 | 1.18 × 10−11 |
|
| 2.25 × 10−4 | 8.48 × 10−9 | 2.97 × 10−8 | 1.12 × 10−9 | 6.95 × 10−10 | 1.61 × 10−8 | 2.25 × 10−4 |
|
| 1.06 × 10−5 | 1.07 × 10−9 | 2.73 × 10−9 | 6.43 × 10−12 | 6.16 × 10−11 | 7.99 × 10−10 | 1.06 × 10−5 |
|
| 5.81 × 10−1 | 1.87 × 10−5 | 1.28 × 10−4 | 4.37 × 10−7 | 1.51 × 10−6 | 5.43 × 10−5 | 5.81 × 10−1 |
|
| 2.05 × 10−7 | 1.06 × 10−10 | 1.36 × 10−10 | 1.51 × 10−12 | 2.74 × 10−12 | 4.28 × 10−11 | 2.05 × 10−7 |
Red: high impact. Yellow-Orange: medium impact. From light green to dark green: from low to very low impact.
Impact at midpoint level for the pilot plant analyzed.
| Total | Steel | Aluminum | Boro- | Polypropylene | Anodi- | Pumps | Transport | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 409.71 | 248.39 | 89.81 | 13.15 | 16.67 | 6.65 | 16.55 | 18.50 |
|
| 2.68 × 10−5 | 1.26 × 10−5 | 7.42 × 10−6 | 8.81 × 10−7 | 3.40 × 10−7 | 7.05 × 10−7 | 9.57 × 10−7 | 3.96 × 10−6 |
|
| 2.01 × 10−5 | 1.18 × 10−5 | 3.25 × 10−6 | 1.73 × 10−7 | 1.19 × 10−7 | 9.74 × 10−8 | 4.45 × 10−6 | 2.50 × 10−7 |
|
| 4.60 × 10−6 | 4.14 × 10−6 | 2.17 × 10−7 | 7.95 × 10−9 | 3.84 × 10−9 | 6.44 × 10−9 | 2.23 × 10−7 | 8.69 × 10−9 |
|
| 2.88 | 1.60 | 0.65 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.05 |
|
| 1.87 × 10−1 | 9.42 × 10−2 | 4.08 × 10−2 | 4.21 × 10−3 | 2.95 × 10−3 | 5.25 × 10−3 | 3.80 × 10−2 | 1.95 × 10−3 |
|
| 5005.53 | 2642.93 | 1106.73 | 158.49 | 527.55 | 115.40 | 180.49 | 273.94 |
|
| 1.47 × 10−2 | 9.11 × 10−3 | 3.39 × 10−4 | 1.94 × 10−3 | 1.55 × 10−4 | 7.23 × 10−5 | 2.14 × 10−3 | 9.10 × 10−4 |
Red: high impact. Yellow-Orange: medium impact. From light green to dark green: from low to very low impact.
Figure 2Comparison of the photo Fenton option for the degradation process of 1 m3 of water per day (caffeine concentration of 1 mg/L). The values are reported grouped for impact category and as a percentage, assigning 100% to the highest impact for each category analyzed.
Figure 3A comparison of the photo Fenton option for the degradation process of 1 m3 of water per day (caffeine concentration of 50 mg/L). The values are reported grouped for impact category and as a percentage, assigning 100% to the greatest impact for each category analyzed.