| Literature DB >> 36014615 |
Joseph Merillyn Vonnie1, Chua Shek Li1, Kana Husna Erna1, Koh Wee Yin1, Wen Xia Ling Felicia1, Md Nasir Nur' Aqilah1, Kobun Rovina1.
Abstract
Heavy metal contamination has spread around the world, particularly in emerging countries. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of starch/eggshell/orange peel-activated carbon-based composite films in removing cadmium (II) ions from water samples. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize the composite films. The effect of Cd2+ was studied using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer and atomic absorption spectroscopy. The morphology of the composite film reveals a highly porous and rough surface with more open channels and a non-uniform honeycomb, indicating that the film has a high potential to adsorb Cd2+. The diffraction peaks for this film were found to be at 13.74°, 17.45°, 18.4°, and 23.6°, indicating a typical crystalline A-type packing arrangement within the starch granules. The results indicate that crystalline structure was unaffected by the addition of eggshell powder and orange peel-activated carbon. In 0.5 mg L-1 and 1.0 mg L-1 Cd2+ ions, the composite film removed 100% and 99.7% of the Cd2+, respectively, while the maximum removal efficiency for methylene blue was 93.75%. Thus, the current study shows that starch/eggshell/orange peel activated carbon film has a high potential for commercial activated carbon as a low-cost adsorbent.Entities:
Keywords: heavy metal; natural adsorbent; orange peel; removal efficiency
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014615 PMCID: PMC9415680 DOI: 10.3390/nano12162750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Different parameters of different types of films.
| Parameters | CS Film | CS/ESP Film | CS/ESP/OPAC Film |
|---|---|---|---|
| e (mm) | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| ρ (g/cm3) | 0.9387 ± 0.07 b | 0.4587 ± 0.02 a | 0.4053 ± 0.06 a |
| MC (%) | 17.56 ± 0.26 b | 14.24 ± 0.44 a | 15.15 ± 0.93 a |
| WS (%) | 21.77 ± 1.21 b | 18.67 ± 1.15 a | 18.08 ± 1.09 a |
| WA (%) | 231.96 ± 1.56 b | 269.74 ± 1.70 c | 197.44 ± 1.78 a |
| SD (%) | 238.28 ± 1.48 a | 290.96 ± 1.57 c | 249.40 ± 2.58 b |
| WVP (gs−1 m Pa) (×10−9) | 315.69 ± 9.00 a | 664.62 ± 6.90 b | 1007.1 ± 12.63 c |
| Biodegradability (%) | 0.83 ± 0.06 a | 0.97 ± 0.17 a | 0.81 ± 0.19 a |
|
| |||
| L* | 99.15 ± 0.01 b | 99.43 ± 0.02 b | 24.76 ± 0.69 a |
| a* | 4.07 ± 0.03 b | 4.24 ± 0.03 c | 1.37 ± 0.05 a |
| b* | 2.95 ± 0.09 c | 2.73 ± 0.07 b | 1.97 ± 0.08 a |
| ΔE | - | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 81.45 ± 0.69 |
Thickness (e), density (ρ), moisture content (MC), water solubility (WS), water absorption (WA), swelling degree (SD), water vapor permeability (WVP), L*: lightness, a*: red-green, b*: yellow-blue. Values were given as mean ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same row indicate significantly different (p < 0.05) when analyzed by Tukey Post Hoc Tests.
Figure 1Biodegradability of different types of films.
Figure 2SEM of micrograph from surface of films (wavelength 100 µm and magnification × 100) (a) CS, (b) CS/ESP, (c) CS/ESP/OPAC and (d) CS/ESP/CAC film; (a1) CS and (b1) CS/ESP (wavelength 10 µm and magnification × 2000); (c1) CS/ESP/OPAC and (d1)CS/ESP/CAC (wavelength 10 µm and magnification × 1000); the cross sectional view of films shows in the red box (a2) CS film, (b2) CS/ESP film, (c2) CS/ESP/OPAC film, and (d2) CS/ESP/CAC film.
Figure 3XRD diffraction patterns of CS/ESP/OPAC film.
Figure 4Schematic representation of photocatalysis and its impacts on the degradation of methylene blue [49].
Figure 5Effect of initial methylene blue dye concentrations on the removal efficiency of methylene blue dye by CS/ESP/OPAC and CS/ESP/CAC films.
Figure 6Effects of initial Cd2+ ion removal efficiency of CS/ESP/ACOP film and CS/ESP/CAC film (Experimental Condition: pH 5, 24 h, 250 rpm, 25 °C).
The comparison of removal efficiency of various biosorbents for Cd2+.
| Adsorbents | Removal Efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|
| Okara waste | 77.07 | [ |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose-hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel films | 91.99 | [ |
| Green algae | 80.87 | [ |
| Microalgal biofilm | 90.35 | [ |
| Chitosan/phosphorylated nanocellulose | 85.00 | [ |
|
| 79.60 | [ |
| 76.62 | [ | |
| CS/ESP/OPAC film | 99.70 | This work |
The comparison of removal efficiency of various biosorbents for methylene blue.
| Adsorbents | Removal Efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|
| Eggshell and eggshell membrane | 94.9 | [ |
| 90.56 | [ | |
| Ipomoea carnea | 79.74 | [ |
| Magnetic Cortaderia selloana flower spikes | 94.69 | [ |
| 5-solfosalycilic acid modified lignin | 83.2 | [ |
| CS/ESP/OPAC film | 93.75 | This work |