| Literature DB >> 36014298 |
Paini Sri Widyawati1, Thomas Indarto Putut Suseno1, Anna Ingani Widjajaseputra1, Theresia Endang Widoeri Widyastuti1, Vincentia Wilhelmina Moeljadi1, Sherina Tandiono1.
Abstract
The study aims to determine the effect of the proportion of κ-carrageenan and the hot water extract of pluchea leaf tea on the quality and sensory properties of stink lily wet noodles. The research design is a randomized block design with two factors, i.e., the difference in the proportion of κ-carrageenan (K) (0, 1, 2, and 3% w/w) and the addition of the hot water extract of the Pluchea indica Less leaf tea (L) (0, 15, and 30% w/v), with 12 treatment levels (K0L0, K0L1, K0L2, K1L0, K1L1, K1L2, K2L0, K2L1, K2L2, K3L0, K3L1, K3L2). The data are analyzed by the ANOVA at p < 5% and continued with the Duncan's multiple range test at p < 5%, and the best treatment was determined by the spider web method based on sensory assay by a hedonic method. The proportions of κ-carrageenan and the concentration of pluchea tea extract had a significant effect on the cooking quality and sensory properties. However, the interaction of the two factors affected the swelling index, yellowness (b*), chroma (C), hue (h), total phenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and DPPH free radical scavenging assay (DPPH). The best treatment of wet noodles was K2L0, with a preference score of 15.8. The binding of κ-carrageenan and phenolic compounds to make a networking structure by intra- and inter-disulfide bind between glucomannan and gluten was thought to affect the cooking quality, sensory properties, bioactive compounds (TPC and TFC), and DPPH.Entities:
Keywords: Amorphophallus muelleri; Pluchea indica Less; quality and sensory properties; wet noodles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014298 PMCID: PMC9415387 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
The formula of the hot water extract of the pluchea leaf tea.
| Materials | Concentration of Hot Water Extract of Pluchea Leaf Tea (% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 15 | 30 | |
| Pluchea leaf tea (g) | 0 | 4.5 | 9 |
| Hot water (mL) | 30 | 30 | 30 |
The formula of the stink lily wet noodles.
| Material | K0L0 | K0L1 | K0L2 | K1L0 | K1L1 | K1L2 | K2L0 | K2L1 | K2L2 | K3L0 | K3L1 | K3L2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat flour (g) | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Stink lily flour (g) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 25.5 |
| κ-Carrageenan (g) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Egg (g) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Salt (g) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Baking powder (g) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Water (mL) | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Hot water extract of the pluchea leaves 15% (mL) | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
| Hot water extract of the pluchea leaves 30% (mL) | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| Total (g) | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 | 214.5 |
Note: K0 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:20:0. K1 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:19:1. K2 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:18:2. K3 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:17:3. L0 = concentration of the hot water extract from the pluchea leaf tea = 0%. L1 = concentration of the hot water extract from the pluchea leaf tea = 15%. L2 = concentration of the hot water extract from the pluchea leaf tea = 30%.
Color, moisture content, swelling index, cooking loss, and tensile strength of the stink lily noodles.
| Samples | Color | Moisture | Swelling | Cooking | Tensile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | C | h | |||||
| K0L0 | 73.00 ± 0.06 | 1.20 ± 0.06 | 16.90 ± 0.25 a | 17.00 ± 0.31 a | 86.40 ± 0.00 g | 64.15 ± 0.70 | 148.90 ± 0.15 c | 18.83 ± 0.44 | 0.106 ± 0.002 |
| K0L1 | 68.70 ± 0.35 | 2.60 ± 0.06 | 26.50 ± 0.32 d | 26.50 ± 0.29 c | 84.40 ± 0.21 bc | 63.66 ± 0.38 | 146.36 ± 0.27 b | 19.06 ± 0.43 | 0.105 ± 0.001 |
| K0L2 | 67.80 ± 0.20 | 2.80 ± 0.06 | 27.80 ± 0.46 ef | 27.80 ± 0.45 e | 84.20 ± 0.32 abc | 62.83 ± 0.58 | 142.25 ± 0.39 a | 20.13 ± 0.71 | 0.116 ± 0.006 |
| K1L0 | 73.40 ± 0.25 | 1.30 ± 0.06 | 17.30 ± 0.15 ab | 17.30 ± 0.15 a | 85.70 ± 0.21 f | 64.42 ± 0.80 | 149.63 ± 0.34 d | 18.47 ± 0.31 | 0.086 ± 0.005 |
| K1L1 | 69.00 ± 0.36 | 2.80 ± 0.12 | 27.30 ± 0.45 e | 27.40 ± 0.50 d | 84.20 ± 0.15 a | 62.95 ± 0.68 | 146.65 ± 0.43 b | 19.36 ± 0.92 | 0.103 ± 0.004 |
| K1L2 | 68.30 ± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.12 | 28.60 ± 0.12 g | 28.70 ± 0.15 f | 84.00 ± 0.15 abc | 63.37 ± 1.04 | 148.85 ± 0.57 c | 19.76 ± 0.90 | 0.108 ± 0.005 |
| K2L0 | 73.70 ± 0.10 | 1.50 ± 0.00 | 17.70 ± 0.26 bc | 17.80 ± 0.23 a | 85.20 ± 0.06 de | 64.67 ± 1.08 | 155.67 ± 0.46 h | 18.18 ± 0.45 | 0.098 ± 0.002 |
| K2L1 | 69.40± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.06 | 28.20 ± 0.15 fg | 28.40 ± 0.15 f | 83.80 ± 0.17 ab | 63.74 ± 0.75 | 150.96 ± 0.71 e | 18.62 ± 0.41 | 0.106 ± 0.005 |
| K2L2 | 68.70 ± 0.06 | 3.10 ± 0.15 | 29.30 ± 0.00 h | 29.40 ± 0.06 g | 84.00 ± 0.15 abc | 64.25 ± 1.60 | 154.82 ± 0.44 g | 19.34 ± 0.77 | 0.114 ± 0.003 |
| K3L0 | 74.50 ± 0.23 | 1.70 ± 0.12 | 18.10 ± 0.00 c | 18.10 ± 0.06 b | 84.60 ± 0.21 cd | 65.83 ± 0.22 | 162.21 ± 0.25 i | 17.83 ± 0.41 | 0.110 ± 0.003 |
| K3L1 | 69.80 ± 0.50 | 3.20 ± 0.06 | 29.30 ± 0.12 h | 29.30 ± 0.06 g | 83.80 ± 0.53 ab | 64.57 ± 1.78 | 153.35 ± 0.15 f | 18.36 ± 0.17 | 0.124 ± 0.007 |
| K3L2 | 69.00 ± 0.20 | 3.30 ± 0.26 | 30.00 ± 0.06 i | 30.10 ± 0.06 h | 83.60 ± 0.06 a | 65.49 ± 1.04 | 159.59 ± 0.52 i | 19.22 ± 0.84 | 0.126 ± 0.008 |
* The results were presented as SD of the means that were achieved by quadruplicate. Means with different superscripts (alphabets) in the same column are significantly different, p < 5%.
Figure 1Stink lily noodles. Note that K0 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:20:0, K1 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:19:1, K2 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:18:2, K3 = wheat flour: stink lily flour: κ-carrageenan = 80:17:3, L0 = concentration of the hot water extract from the pluchea leaf tea = 0%, L1 = concentration of the hot water extract from the pluchea leaf tea = 15%, L2 = concentration of the hot water extract from the pluchea leaf tea = 30%.
Total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and the DPPH free radical scavenging activity of the stink lily noodles.
| Samples | TPC (mg GAE/g Dry Noodles) | TFC (mg CE/g Dry Noodles) | DPPH Scavenging Activity (mg GAE/g Dry Noodles) |
|---|---|---|---|
| K0L0 | 0.341 ± 0.034 a | 0.057 ± 0.004 a | 0.414 ± 0.006 a |
| K0L1 | 0.948 ± 0.027 d | 0.704 ± 0.007 c | 0.742 ± 0.016 c |
| K0L2 | 1.099 ± 0.047 e | 1.109 ± 0.007 d | 0.757 ± 0.001 c |
| K1L0 | 0.458 ± 0.040 b | 0.082 ± 0.002 a | 0.523 ± 0.026 b |
| K1L1 | 0.924 ± 0.077 d | 0.735 ± 0.003 c | 0.750 ± 0.006 c |
| K1L2 | 1.005 ± 0.070 d | 1.091 ± 0.095 d | 0.751 ± 0.001 c |
| K2L0 | 0.500 ± 0.045 b | 0.089 ± 0.008 a | 0.532 ± 0.005 b |
| K2L1 | 0.965 ± 0.025 d | 0.718 ± 0.018 c | 0.748 ± 0.004 c |
| K2L2 | 1.196 ± 0.027 f | 1.336 ± 0.046 e | 0.758 ± 0.009 c |
| K3L0 | 0.527 ± 0.007 b | 0.218 ± 0.003 b | 0.587 ± 0.020 b |
| K3L1 | 0.807 ± 0.031 c | 0.726 ± 0.039 c | 0.751 ± 0.008 c |
| K3L2 | 1.145 ± 0.064 ef | 1.067 ± 0.063 d | 0.751 ± 0.007 c |
Note: The results were presented as SD of the means that were achieved by quadruplicate. Means with different superscripts (alphabets) in the same column are significantly different, p < 5%.
Sensory properties of the stink lily noodles.
| Samples | Hedonic Preference Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Aroma | Taste | Texture | Overall Acceptance | |
| K0L0 | 12.02 f | 10.93 d | 10.52 | 10.95 | 11.24 f |
| K0L1 | 9.12 a | 10.26 cd | 8.72 | 10.03 | 8.79 a |
| K0L2 | 11.83 ef | 8.86 ab | 8.18 | 9.58 | 9.04 ab |
| K1L0 | 9.98 bc | 11.58 e | 10.15 | 11.66 | 10.3 cde |
| K1L1 | 9.44 ab | 9.58 bc | 9.49 | 10.66 | 8.93 ab |
| K1L2 | 10.59 cd | 8.45 a | 8.87 | 9.46 | 9.11 ab |
| K2L0 | 11.62 f | 10.93 de | 11.08 | 11.15 | 11.07 def |
| K2L1 | 10.63 cd | 10.14 ab | 9.82 | 10.61 | 9.42 abc |
| K2L2 | 10.94 de | 8.84 cd | 9.09 | 10.38 | 10.16 cde |
| K3L0 | 11.51 ef | 10.36 cd | 10.37 | 11.07 | 10.84 def |
| K3L1 | 9.37 ab | 10.07 a | 9.95 | 11 | 9.72 bc |
| K3L2 | 9.47 ab | 8.29 cd | 9.57 | 9.64 | 8.62 a |
Note: The results were presented as SD of the means that were achieved by quadruplicate. Means with different superscripts (alphabets) in the same column are significantly different, p < 5%.
Figure 2Spider web graph to determine the best treatment of the stink lily noodles.